7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Can the International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action and Cairo Consensus Normalize the Discourse on Population?

      article-commentary
      a , b
      Global Health: Science and Practice
      Global Health: Science and Practice

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action and its Cairo Consensus can help ensure that policy responses uphold human rights and gender equality, thereby serving as the singular global reference that could bring opposing voices in the population debate together.

          Key Messages

          • The International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) has come to represent shorthand for the shift from family planning programs funded based on macrodemographic variables to focus global attention on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on the lives and opportunities of individual women.

          • This shorthand ignores language in the ICPD Programme of Action and the Cairo Consensus that was forged, acknowledging that enhancing individual health and rights would contribute to the demographic transition.

          • Country policies since ICPD have expanded to incorporate components of the Cairo Consensus, focusing on population and sustainable development, with an expanded focus on reproductive health, individual choice, and women’s empowerment. Yet, the global discourse on “population” has grown more toxic.

          • As we near the final years of the Sustainable Development Goal Agenda, we argue that the continued polarization of views about the role of population in addressing the world’s most urgent global health and public policy issues can be bridged by referring back to the comprehensive, inclusive, and progressive ICPD Programme of Action.

          Related collections

          Most cited references106

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions.

          Substantial changes in population size, age structure, and urbanization are expected in many parts of the world this century. Although such changes can affect energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, emissions scenario analyses have either left them out or treated them in a fragmentary or overly simplified manner. We carry out a comprehensive assessment of the implications of demographic change for global emissions of carbon dioxide. Using an energy-economic growth model that accounts for a range of demographic dynamics, we show that slowing population growth could provide 16-29% of the emissions reductions suggested to be necessary by 2050 to avoid dangerous climate change. We also find that aging and urbanization can substantially influence emissions in particular world regions.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Report: not found

              Adding It Up: Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health 2019

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Glob Health Sci Pract
                Glob Health Sci Pract
                ghsp
                ghsp
                Global Health: Science and Practice
                Global Health: Science and Practice
                2169-575X
                29 October 2024
                29 October 2024
                : 12
                : 5
                : e2400121
                Affiliations
                [a ]University of Washington , Department of Global Health; Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, Seattle, WA, USA.
                [b ]Hardee Associates , Arlington, VA, USA.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Win Brown ( winbrown77@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Article
                GHSP-D-24-00121
                10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00121
                11521559
                39353708
                2f97f01d-fc02-4a0c-a0f0-3d2572c9863c
                © Brown and Hardee.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00121

                History
                : 17 March 2024
                : 29 August 2024
                Categories
                Commentary

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log