Blog
About

8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The limits of nuclear encoded SSU rDNA for resolving the diatom phylogeny.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A recent reclassification of diatoms based on phylogenies recovered using the nuclear-encoded SSU rRNA gene contains three major classes, Coscinodiscophyceae, Mediophyceae and the Bacillariophyceae (the CMB hypothesis). We evaluated this with a sequence alignment of 1336 protist and heterokont algae SSU rRNAs, which includes 673 diatoms. Sequences were aligned to maintain structural elements conserved within this dataset. Parsimony analysis rejected the CMB hypothesis, albeit weakly. Morphological data are also incongruent with this recent CMB hypothesis of three diatom clades. We also reanalyzed a recently published dataset which purports to support the CMB hypothesis. Our reanalysis found that the original analysis had not converged on the true bipartition posterior probability distribution, and rejected the CMB hypothesis. Thus we conclude that a reclassification of the evolutionary relationships of the diatoms according to the CMB hypothesis is premature.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Eur. J. Phycol.
          European journal of phycology
          Informa UK Limited
          0967-0262
          0967-0262
          Aug 01 2009
          : 44
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Texas Natural Science Center, 2400 Trinity Street, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
          Article
          NIHMS156643
          10.1080/09670260902749159
          2835975
          20224747

          Comments

          Comment on this article