348
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again

      ,

      Behavioral and Brain Sciences

      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 98

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.

           R K Merton (1968)
          This account of the Matthew effect is another small exercise in the psychosociological analysis of the workings of science as a social institution. The initial problem is transformed by a shift in theoretical perspective. As originally identified, the Matthew effect was construed in terms of enhancement of the position of already eminent scientists who are given disproportionate credit in cases of collaboration or of independent multiple discoveries. Its significance was thus confined to its implications for the reward system of science. By shifting the angle of vision, we note other possible kinds of consequences, this time for the communication system of science. The Matthew effect may serve to heighten the visibility of contributions to science by scientists of acknowledged standing and to reduce the visibility of contributions by authors who are less well known. We examine the psychosocial conditions and mechanisms underlying this effect and find a correlation between the redundancy function of multiple discoveries and the focalizing function of eminent men of science-a function which is reinforced by the great value these men place upon finding basic problems and by their self-assurance. This self-assurance, which is partly inherent, partly the result of experiences and associations in creative scientific environments, and partly a result of later social validation of their position, encourages them to search out risky but important problems and to highlight the results of their inquiry. A macrosocial version of the Matthew principle is apparently involved in those processes of social selection that currently lead to the concentration of scientific resources and talent (50).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                Behavioral and Brain Sciences
                Behav Brain Sci
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0140-525X
                1469-1825
                June 1982
                February 4 2010
                : 5
                : 02
                : 187
                Article
                10.1017/S0140525X00011183
                © 2010

                Comments

                Comment on this article