Novel acute kidney injury biomarkers: their characteristics, utility and concerns

Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality, despite progress in medical care. Although the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-Stage Kidney Disease) and AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network) criteria, based on serum creatinine and urine output, were a step forward in diagnosing AKI, a reliable tool to differentiate between true parenchymal and pre-renal azotaemia in clinical practice is still lacking. In the last decade, many papers on the use of new urinary and serum biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognostication of AKI have been published. Thus, the question arises which biomarker is a reliable differential diagnostic tool under which circumstances. We searched Medline from inception to April 2012 using medical subject heading and text words for AKI and biomarkers [neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), Cystatin C, interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-18 (IL-18), N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG), glutathione transferases (GST) and liver fatty acid binding protein (LFABP)] to identify relevant papers in five different settings (paediatrics, cardiac surgery, emergency department, critically ill and contrast-induced nephropathy). We included 87 relevant papers, reporting on 74 studies. Depending upon the setting, 7-27 different definitions of AKI were used. Reported diagnostic performance of the different biomarkers was variable from poor to excellent, and no consistent generalizable conclusions can be drawn on their diagnostic value. Early diagnosing of AKI in clinical conditions by using new serum and urinary biomarkers remains cumbersome, especially in those settings where timing and aetiology of AKI are not well defined. Putting too much emphasis on markers that have not convincingly proven reliability might lead to incorrect interpretation of clinical trials. Further research in this field is warranted before biomarkers can be introduced in clinical practice.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are conditions that substantially increase morbidity and mortality. Although novel biomarkers are being used in practice, the diagnosis of AKI and CKD is still made with surrogate markers of GFR, such as serum creatinine (SCr), urine output and creatinine based estimating equations. SCr is limited as a marker of kidney dysfunction in both settings and may be inaccurate in several situations, such as in patients with low muscle mass or with fluid overload. New biomarkers have the potential to identify earlier patients with AKI and CKD and in the future potentially intervene to modify outcomes.

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), a 25 kDa protein produced by injured nephron epithelia, is one of the most promising new markers of renal epithelial injury. In contrast to serum creatinine and urinary output, which are the measures of kidney function, NGAL is specifically induced in the damaged nephron and then released into blood and urine, where it can be readily measured. Careful proof-of-concept studies using defined animal models have uncovered the sources and trafficking of NGAL in acute kidney injury (AKI) and have addressed the contributions of renal and non-renal sources. Clinical studies indicate that NGAL, unlike creatinine, is a marker responsive to tissue stress and nephron injury, but less so to adaptive hemodynamic responses. In certain clinical settings, NGAL is an earlier marker compared with serum creatinine. In addition, clinical studies have shown that NGAL is a powerful predictor of poor clinical outcomes, which can be used to risk stratify patients when combined with serum creatinine. NGAL has important limitations, including its responsiveness in systemic inflammation, which is partially uncoupled from its response to kidney injury and which needs to be considered when interpreting NGAL results clinically. This review covers the biology and pathophysiology of NGAL and summarizes the results of the growing body of clinical studies that have addressed the utility of NGAL in the early diagnosis of AKI, in the distinction of intrinsic AKI and in the prognostic assessment of broad patient populations. © 2013 The Authors Acta Physiologica © 2013 Scandinavian Physiological Society.