8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Inhaler competence in asthma: common errors, barriers to use and recommended solutions.

      Respiratory Medicine

      Administration, Inhalation, Adolescent, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, administration & dosage, therapeutic use, Asthma, drug therapy, psychology, Child, Child, Preschool, Clinical Competence, Dry Powder Inhalers, Humans, Medication Errors, Metered Dose Inhalers, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, methods, Patient Medication Knowledge

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Whilst the inhaled route is the first line administration method in the management of asthma, it is well documented that patients can have problems adopting the correct inhaler technique and thus receiving adequate medication. This applies equally to metered dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers and leads to poor disease control and increased healthcare costs. Reviews have highlighted these problems and the recent European Consensus Statement developed a call to action to seek solutions. This review takes forward the challenge of inhaler competence by highlighting the issues and suggesting potential solutions to these problems. The opportunity for technological innovation and educational interventions to reduce errors is highlighted, as well as the specific challenges faced by children. This review is intended as a policy document, as most issues faced by patients have not changed for half a century, and this situation should not be allowed to continue any longer. Future direction with respect to research, policy needs and practice, together with education requirements in inhaler technique are described. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          23098685
          10.1016/j.rmed.2012.09.017

          Comments

          Comment on this article