3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      344 Grazing behavior and performance of bred beef heifers grazing stockpiled perennial or annual forages in western Canada.

      abstract

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study compared grazing behavior and performance of bred beef heifers while stockpile grazing in late fall/early winter. Four stockpiled forage treatments were grazed for 2x28 d grazing periods near Brandon, Manitoba, Canada. Treatments included: 1)Courtney tall fescue (T; Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort., formerly Festuca arundinacea)/Fleet meadow brome (M; Bromopsis biebersteinii) (50:50; TFM), 2)Killarney orchardgrass (O; Dactylis glomeratata)/Algonquin alfalfa (A; Medicago sativa) (50:50; OGA), 3)Courtney tall fescue/Algonquin alfalfa/Oxley II cicer milkvetch (Ox; Astragalus cicer) (50:25:25; TAC) and 4)Fusion corn (COR; Zea mays) in a RCBD with 4 heifers/replicate/ treatment. Heifers were weighed at the beginning and end of each period to determine weight and average daily gain (ADG). A minimum of 3 heifers/treatment wore Lotek 3300L GPS collars to track location every 10 min during the day (05:00-21:00) and 30 min at night (21:00-05:00) during both periods. Windbreak fences were placed on pasture in period 2 when average temperatures and wind speeds were -18.7⁰C and 54 km hr -1, respectively. Time spent grazing (min d -1) was measured by time between location fixes. Animal weight did not differ (P=0.3144) between treatments but differed between period 1 (581kg) and period 2 (525kg;P<0.001). In period 1 ADG increased (1.36kg) and decreased in period 2 (-2.00kg;P<0.001). Heifers spent a higher proportion of time each day at the shelter when grazing TFM (0.5362), TAC (0.4307) and OGA (0.3908) compared to COR (0.06813;P<0.001). TFM was higher than TAC and OGA (P<0.05). Heifers spent more time at shelter (P<0.001) at night (0.5047) than during the day (0.2082) for all treatments. In conclusion, cattle grazing corn spent less time at shelter than those grazing perennial treatments, suggesting corn offered sufficient shelter to reduce non-grazing time. However, all cattle lost weight in period 2 once weather conditions declined.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Anim Sci
          J. Anim. Sci
          jansci
          Journal of Animal Science
          Oxford University Press (US )
          0021-8812
          1525-3163
          December 2018
          07 December 2018
          : 96
          : Suppl 3
          : 171-172
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Manitoba,Carberry, MB, Canada
          [2 ]University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
          Article
          PMC6285075 PMC6285075 6285075 sky404.374
          10.1093/jas/sky404.374
          6285075
          30440946-1bf9-4a2d-ae5c-0fdc754141a9
          © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 2
          Categories
          Abstracts
          CSAS Graduate Student Oral Competition: Ms Division

          grazing,shelter,behaviour
          grazing, shelter, behaviour

          Comments

          Comment on this article