26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adolescent Gender Differences in Cognitive Control Performance and Functional Connectivity Between Default Mode and Fronto-Parietal Networks Within a Self-Referential Context

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ineffective reduction of functional connectivity between the default mode network (DMN) and frontoparietal network (FPN) during cognitive control can interfere with performance in healthy individuals—a phenomenon present in psychiatric disorders, such as depression. Here, this mechanism is studied in healthy adolescents by examining gender differences in task-regressed functional connectivity using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a novel task designed to place the DMN—supporting self-referential processing (SRP)—and FPN—supporting cognitive control—into conflict. Compared to boys, girls showed stronger functional connectivity between DMN and FPN during cognitive control in an SRP context ( n = 40; boys = 20), a context that also elicited more errors of omission in girls. The gender difference in errors of omission was mediated by higher self-reported co-rumination—the extensive and repetitive discussion of problems and focus on negative feelings with a same-gender peer—by girls, compared to boys. These findings indicate that placing internal and external attentional demands in conflict lead to persistent functional connectivity between FPN and DMN in girls, but not boys; however, deficits in performance during this context were explained by co-rumination, such that youth with higher co-rumination displayed the largest performance deficits. Previous research shows that co-rumination predicts depressive symptoms during adolescence; thus, gender differences in the mechanisms involved with transitioning from internal to external processing may be relevant for understanding heightened vulnerability for depression in adolescent girls.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A dual-networks architecture of top-down control.

            Complex systems ensure resilience through multiple controllers acting at rapid and slower timescales. The need for efficient information flow through complex systems encourages small-world network structures. On the basis of these principles, a group of regions associated with top-down control was examined. Functional magnetic resonance imaging showed that each region had a specific combination of control signals; resting-state functional connectivity grouped the regions into distinct 'fronto-parietal' and 'cingulo-opercular' components. The fronto-parietal component seems to initiate and adjust control; the cingulo-opercular component provides stable 'set-maintenance' over entire task epochs. Graph analysis showed dense local connections within components and weaker 'long-range' connections between components, suggesting a small-world architecture. The control systems of the brain seem to embody the principles of complex systems, encouraging resilient performance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys.

              Theory and research on sex differences in adjustment focus largely on parental, societal, and biological influences. However, it also is important to consider how peers contribute to girls' and boys' development. This article provides a critical review of sex differences in several peer relationship processes, including behavioral and social-cognitive styles, stress and coping, and relationship provisions. The authors present a speculative peer-socialization model based on this review in which the implications of these sex differences for girls' and boys' emotional and behavioral development are considered. Central to this model is the idea that sex-linked relationship processes have costs and benefits for girls' and boys' adjustment. Finally, the authors present recent research testing certain model components and propose approaches for testing understudied aspects of the model.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Behav Neurosci
                Front Behav Neurosci
                Front. Behav. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5153
                23 April 2018
                2018
                : 12
                : 73
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA, United States
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR, United States
                [3] 3Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR, United States
                [4] 4Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR, United States
                [5] 5Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Regina Marie Sullivan, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, United States

                Reviewed by: Brittany Rollins Howell, University of Minnesota, United States; Johanna M. Jarcho, Stony Brook University, United States

                *Correspondence: Gabriela Alarcón alarcong2@ 123456upmc.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00073
                5924772
                30932359-2d5e-4a08-9eb7-eecc5f6d891c
                Copyright © 2018 Alarcón, Pfeifer, Fair and Nagel.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 January 2018
                : 03 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 119, Pages: 16, Words: 12221
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: AA23688, AA017664, MH099618
                Funded by: American Psychological Association 10.13039/100006324
                Award ID: 110415
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                adolescence,self-referential processing,cognitive control,gender differences,co-rumination,functional magnetic resonance imaging,default mode network,fronto-parietal network

                Comments

                Comment on this article