22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Twenty-Four Hour Total and Dietary Fat Oxidation in Lean, Obese and Reduced-Obese Adults with and without a Bout of Exercise

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          It has been hypothesized that obese and reduced-obese individuals have decreased oxidative capacity, which contributes to weight gain and regain. Recent data have challenged this concept.

          Objective

          To determine (1) whether total and dietary fat oxidation are decreased in obese and reduced-obese adults compared to lean but increase in response to an acute exercise bout and (2) whether regular physical activity attenuates these metabolic alterations.

          Design

          We measured 24-hr total (whole-room calorimetry) and dietary fat ( 14C-oleate) oxidation in Sedentary Lean (BMI = 21.5±1.6; n = 10), Sedentary Obese (BMI = 33.6±2.5; n = 9), Sedentary Reduced-Obese (RED-SED; BMI = 26.9±3.7; n = 7) and in Physically Active Reduced-Obese (RED-EX; BMI = 27.3±2.8; n = 12) men and women with or without an acute exercise bout where energy expended during exercise was not replaced.

          Results

          Although Red-SED and Red-EX had a similar level of fatness, aerobic capacity and metabolic profiles were better in Red-EX only compared to Obese subjects. No significant between-group differences were seen in 24-hr respiratory quotient (RQ, Lean: 0.831±0.044, Obese: 0.852±0.023, Red-SED: 0.864±0.037, Red-EX: 0.842±0.039), total and dietary fat oxidation. A single bout of exercise increased total (+27.8%, p<0.0001) and dietary (+6.6%, p = 0.048) fat oxidation across groups. Although exercise did not impact RQ during the day, it decreased RQ during sleep (p = 0.01) in all groups. Red-EX oxidized more fat overnight than Red-SED subjects under both resting (p = 0.036) and negative energy balance (p = 0.003) conditions, even after adjustment for fat-free mass.

          Conclusion

          Obese and reduced-obese individuals oxidize as much fat as lean both under eucaloric and negative energy balance conditions, which does not support the hypothesis of reduced oxidative capacity in these groups. Reduced-obese individuals who exercise regularly have markers of metabolic health similar to those seen in lean adults. Both the acute and chronic effects of exercise were primarily observed at night suggesting an important role of sleep in the regulation of lipid metabolism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Skeletal muscle fatty acid metabolism in association with insulin resistance, obesity, and weight loss.

          The current study was undertaken to investigate fatty acid metabolism by skeletal muscle to examine potential mechanisms that could lead to increased muscle triglyceride in obesity. Sixteen lean and 40 obese research volunteers had leg balance measurement of glucose and free fatty acid (FFA) uptake (fractional extraction of [9,10 (3)H]oleate) and indirect calorimetry across the leg to determine substrate oxidation during fasting and insulin-stimulated conditions. Muscle obtained by percutaneous biopsy had lower carnitine palmitoyl transferase (CPT) activity and oxidative enzyme activity in obesity (P < 0.05). During fasting conditions, obese subjects had an elevated leg respiratory quotient (RQ, 0.83 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.01; P < 0.01) and reduced fat oxidation but similar FFA uptake across the leg. During insulin infusions, fat oxidation by leg tissues was suppressed in lean but not obese subjects; rates of FFA uptake were similar. Fasting values for leg RQ correlated with insulin sensitivity (r = -0.57, P < 0.001). Thirty-two of the obese subjects were restudied after weight loss (WL, -14.0 +/- 0.9 kg); insulin sensitivity and insulin suppression of fat oxidation improved (P < 0.01), but fasting leg RQ (0.90 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.02, pre-WL vs. post-WL) and muscle CPT activity did not change. The findings suggest that triglyceride accumulation in skeletal muscle in obesity derives from reduced capacity for fat oxidation and that inflexibility in regulating fat oxidation, more than fatty acid uptake, is related to insulin resistance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meta-analysis: pharmacologic treatment of obesity.

            In response to the increase in obesity, pharmacologic treatments for weight loss have become more numerous and more commonly used. To assess the efficacy and safety of weight loss medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other medications that have been used for weight loss. Electronic databases, experts in the field, and unpublished information. Up-to-date meta-analyses of sibutramine, phentermine, and diethylpropion were identified. The authors assessed in detail 50 studies of orlistat, 13 studies of fluoxetine, 5 studies of bupropion, 9 studies of topiramate, and 1 study each of sertraline and zonisamide. Meta-analysis was performed for all medications except sertraline, zonisamide, and fluoxetine, which are summarized narratively. The authors abstracted information about study design, intervention, co-interventions, population, outcomes, and methodologic quality, as well as weight loss and adverse events from controlled trials of medication. All pooled weight loss values are reported relative to placebo. A meta-analysis of sibutramine reported a mean difference in weight loss of 4.45 kg (95% CI, 3.62 to 5.29 kg) at 12 months. In the meta-analysis of orlistat, the estimate of the mean weight loss for orlistat-treated patients was 2.89 kg (CI, 2.27 to 3.51 kg) at 12 months. A recent meta-analysis of phentermine and diethylpropion reported pooled mean differences in weight loss at 6 months of 3.6 kg (CI, 0.6 to 6.0 kg) for phentermine-treated patients and 3.0 kg (CI, -1.6 to 11.5 kg) for diethylpropion-treated patients. Weight loss in fluoxetine studies ranged from 14.5 kg of weight lost to 0.4 kg of weight gained at 12 or more months. For bupropion, 2.77 kg (CI, 1.1 to 4.5 kg) of weight was lost at 6 to 12 months. Weight loss due to topiramate at 6 months was 6.5% (CI, 4.8% to 8.3%) of pretreatment weight. With one exception, long-term studies of health outcomes were lacking. Significant side effects that varied by drug were reported. Publication bias may exist despite a comprehensive search and despite the lack of statistical evidence for the existence of bias. Evidence of heterogeneity was observed for all meta-analyses. Sibutramine, orlistat, phentermine, probably diethylpropion, bupropion, probably fluoxetine, and topiramate promote modest weight loss when given along with recommendations for diet. Sibutramine and orlistat are the 2 most-studied drugs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on body composition and fat distribution.

              There is debate over the independent and combined effects of dieting and increased physical activity on improving metabolic risk factors (body composition and fat distribution). The objective of the study was to conduct a randomized, controlled trial (CALERIE) to test the effect of a 25% energy deficit by diet alone or diet plus exercise for 6 months on body composition and fat distribution. This was a randomized, controlled trial. The study was conducted at an institutional research center. Thirty-five of 36 overweight but otherwise healthy participants (16 males, 19 females) completed the study. Participants were randomized to either control (healthy weight maintenance diet, n = 11), caloric restriction (CR; 25% reduction in energy intake, n = 12), or caloric restriction plus exercise (CR+EX; 12.5% reduction in energy intake + 12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure, n = 12) for 6 months. Changes in body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and changes in abdominal fat distribution by multislice computed tomography were measured. The calculated energy deficit across the intervention was not different between CR and CR+EX. Participants lost approximately 10% of body weight (CR: - 8.3 +/- 0.8, CR+EX: - 8.1 +/- 0.8 kg, P = 1.00), approximately 24% of fat mass (CR: - 5.8 +/- 0.6, CR+EX: - 6.4 +/- 0.6 kg, P = 0.99), and 27% of abdominal visceral fat (CR: 0.9 +/- 0.2, CR+EX: 0.8 +/- 0.2 kg, P = 1.00). Both whole-body and abdominal fat distribution were not altered by the intervention. Exercise plays an equivalent role to CR in terms of energy balance; however, it can also improve aerobic fitness, which has other important cardiovascular and metabolic implications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                8 April 2014
                : 9
                : 4
                : e94181
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Anschutz Health & Wellness Center at the University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
                [2 ]Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
                [3 ]Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, United States of America
                INSERM/UMR 1048, France
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: DHB. Performed the experiments: AB EK SS MJ. Analyzed the data: AB MJ DHB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AB DHB. Wrote the paper: AB EK SS MJ DHB.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-49146
                10.1371/journal.pone.0094181
                3979741
                24714529
                30986fe5-f99a-4918-ade4-359cc81d2e31
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 21 November 2013
                : 14 March 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                DHB received support from the National Institutes of Health through K24DK002935. The study was further supported by the NIH/NCRR Colorado CTSI Grant: UL 1 RR025780 and the Colorado Nutrition Obesity Research Center: P30DK048520. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Lipids
                Lipid Metabolism
                Metabolism
                Energy Metabolism
                Nutrition
                Physiology
                Physiological Parameters
                Body Weight
                Obesity
                Physiological Processes
                Sleep
                Systems Biology
                Integrative Physiology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Sports and Exercise Medicine
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Clinical Research Design
                Cross-Sectional Studies

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article