8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Radiologic progression of glioblastoma under therapy—an exploratory analysis of AVAglio

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In this exploratory analysis of AVAglio, a randomized phase III clinical study that investigated the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to radiotherapy/temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, we aim to radiologically characterize glioblastoma on therapy until progression and investigate whether the type of radiologic progression differs between treatment arms and is related to survival and molecular data.

          Methods

          Five progression types (PTs) were categorized using an adapted algorithm according to MRI contrast enhancement behavior in T1- and T2-weighted images in 621 patients (Bev, n = 299; placebo, n = 322). Frequencies of PTs (designated as classic T1, cT1 relapse, T2 diffuse, T2 circumscribed, and primary nonresponder), time to progression (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed within each treatment arm and compared with molecular subtypes and O 6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT) promoter methylation status.

          Results

          PT frequencies differed between the Bev and placebo arms, except for “T2 diffuse” (12.4% and 7.1%, respectively). PTs showed differences in PFS and OS; with “T2 diffuse” being associated with longest survival. Complete disappearance of contrast enhancement during treatment (“cT1 relapse”) showed longer survival than only partial contrast enhancement decrease (“classic T1”). “T2 diffuse” was more commonly MGMT hypermethylated. Only weak correlations to molecular subtypes from primary tissue were detected.

          Conclusions

          Progression of glioblastoma under therapy can be characterized radiologically. These radiologic phenotypes are influenced by treatment and develop differently over time with differential outcomes. Complete resolution of contrast enhancement during treatment is a favorable factor for outcome.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Neuro Oncol
          Neuro-oncology
          neuonc
          Neuro-Oncology
          Oxford University Press (US )
          1522-8517
          1523-5866
          March 2018
          01 September 2017
          27 March 2019
          : 20
          : 4
          : 557-566
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Neurology, Innsbruck, Austria
          [2 ]Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, CHU Timone, Marseille, France
          [3 ]University Medical Center, Neuroradiology, Heidelberg, Germany
          [4 ]F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
          [5 ]Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
          [6 ]Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
          [7 ]Regional Cancer Center Stockholm and Umeå University, Stockholm and Umeå, Sweden
          [8 ]The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
          [9 ]UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory and Neuro-Oncology Program, Los Angeles, California, USA
          [10 ]University Medical Center, Neurology, and Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center and the German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
          [11 ]Neurology University Clinic, Mannheim, Germany
          [12 ]Genentech, South San Francisco, California, USA
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Martha Nowosielski, MD, PhD, or Wolfgang Wick, MD, Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany ( Martha.Nowosielski@ 123456i-med.ac.at , wolfgang.wick@ 123456med.uni-heidelberg.de ).
          Article
          PMC5909665 PMC5909665 5909665 nox162
          10.1093/neuonc/nox162
          5909665
          29016943
          30af6c65-04e3-4f0d-8a0b-54d589d5abd0
          © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
          History
          Page count
          Pages: 10
          Funding
          Funded by: F. Hoffmann-La Roche 10.13039/100007013
          Categories
          Clinical Investigations

          treatment resistance,radiologic phenotypes,MRI,bevacizumab

          Comments

          Comment on this article