32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In two experiments, we investigated comprehension monitoring in 10–12 years old children differing in reading comprehension skill. The children’s self-paced reading times (Experiment 1) and eye fixations and regressions (Experiment 2) were measured as they read narrative texts in which an action of the protagonist was consistent or inconsistent with a description of the protagonist’s character given earlier. The character description and action were adjacent (local condition) or separated by a long filler paragraph (global condition). The self-paced reading data (Experiment 1), the initial reading and rereading data (Experiment 2), together with the comprehension question data (both experiments), are discussed within the situation model framework and suggest that poor comprehenders find difficulty in constructing a richly elaborated situation model. Poor comprehenders presumably fail to represent character information in the model as a consequence of which they are not able to detect inconsistencies in the global condition (in which the character information is lost from working memory). The patterns of results rule out an explanation in terms of impaired situation model updating ability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach.

            The current study demonstrates the separability of spatial and verbal working memory resources among college students. In Experiment 1, we developed a spatial span task that taxes both the processing and storage components of spatial working memory. This measure correlates with spatial ability (spatial visualization) measures, but not with verbal ability measures. In contrast, the reading span test, a common test of verbal working memory, correlates with verbal ability measures, but not with spatial ability measures. Experiment 2, which uses an interference paradigm to cross the processing and storage demands of span tasks, replicates this dissociation and further demonstrates that both the processing and storage components of working memory tasks are important for predicting performance on spatial thinking and language processing tasks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Situation models in language comprehension and memory.

              This article reviews research on the use of situation models in language comprehension and memory retrieval over the past 15 years. Situation models are integrated mental representations of a described state of affairs. Significant progress has been made in the scientific understanding of how situation models are involved in language comprehension and memory retrieval. Much of this research focuses on establishing the existence of situation models, often by using tasks that assess one dimension of a situation model. However, the authors argue that the time has now come for researchers to begin to take the multidimensionality of situation models seriously. The authors offer a theoretical framework and some methodological observations that may help researchers to tackle this issue.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31205988908 , +31205988745 , M.van.der.Schoot@psy.vu.nl
                Journal
                Read Writ
                Read Writ
                Reading and Writing
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0922-4777
                1573-0905
                18 August 2011
                18 August 2011
                August 2012
                : 25
                : 7
                : 1665-1690
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Educational Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Psychosocial Development in Context, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Article
                9337
                10.1007/s11145-011-9337-4
                3395345
                23293428
                30d83a19-2add-42d3-be20-861699bb5938
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

                Neurosciences
                situation models,comprehension monitoring,children,inconsistency detection,reading comprehension,eye fixations

                Comments

                Comment on this article