29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Aggression in Women: Behavior, Brain and Hormones

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We review the literature on aggression in women with an emphasis on laboratory experimentation and hormonal and brain mechanisms. Women tend to engage in more indirect forms of aggression (e.g., spreading rumors) than other types of aggression. In laboratory studies, women are less aggressive than men, but provocation attenuates this difference. In the real world, women are just as likely to aggress against their romantic partner as men are, but men cause more serious physical and psychological harm. A very small minority of women are also sexually violent. Women are susceptible to alcohol-related aggression, but this type of aggression may be limited to women high in trait aggression. Fear of being harmed is a robust inhibitor of direct aggression in women. There are too few studies and most are underpowered to detect unique neural mechanisms associated with aggression in women. Testosterone shows the same small, positive relationship with aggression in women as in men. The role of cortisol is unclear, although some evidence suggests that women who are high in testosterone and low in cortisol show heightened aggression. Under some circumstances, oxytocin may increase aggression by enhancing reactivity to provocation and simultaneously lowering perceptions of danger that normally inhibit many women from retaliating. There is some evidence that high levels of estradiol and progesterone are associated with low levels of aggression. We highlight that more gender-specific theory-driven hypothesis testing is needed with larger samples of women and aggression paradigms relevant to women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references184

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Human aggression.

          Research on human aggression has progressed to a point at which a unifying framework is needed. Major domain-limited theories of aggression include cognitive neoassociation, social learning, social interaction, script, and excitation transfer theories. Using the general aggression model (GAM), this review posits cognition, affect, and arousal to mediate the effects of situational and personological variables on aggression. The review also organizes recent theories of the development and persistence of aggressive personality. Personality is conceptualized as a set of stable knowledge structures that individuals use to interpret events in their social world and to guide their behavior. In addition to organizing what is already known about human aggression, this review, using the GAM framework, also serves the heuristic function of suggesting what research is needed to fill in theoretical gaps and can be used to create and test interventions for reducing aggression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications.

              The authors review a range of evidence concerning the motivational underpinnings of anger as an affect, with particular reference to the relationship between anger and anxiety or fear. The evidence supports the view that anger relates to an appetitive or approach motivational system, whereas anxiety relates to an aversive or avoidance motivational system. This evidence appears to have 2 implications. One implication concerns the nature of anterior cortical asymmetry effects. The evidence suggests that such asymmetry reflects direction of motivational engagement (approach vs. withdrawal) rather than affective valence. The other implication concerns the idea that affects form a purely positive dimension and a purely negative dimension, which reflect the operation of appetitive and aversive motivational systems, respectively. The evidence reviewed does not support that view. The evidence is, however, consistent with a discrete-emotions view (which does not rely on dimensionality) and with an alternative dimensional approach. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Behav Neurosci
                Front Behav Neurosci
                Front. Behav. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5153
                02 May 2018
                2018
                : 12
                : 81
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Psychology, University of New South Wales , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [2] 2Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Science, University of New South Wales , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Nelly Alia-Klein, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

                Reviewed by: Lesley J. Rogers, University of New England, Australia; Gennady Knyazev, Institute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, Russia

                *Correspondence: Thomas F. Denson t.denson@ 123456unsw.edu.au
                Article
                10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00081
                5942158
                29770113
                30d939de-4321-474c-84bd-96dd3182c705
                Copyright © 2018 Denson, O’Dean, Blake and Beames.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 17 November 2017
                : 16 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 214, Pages: 20, Words: 18465
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Research Council 10.13039/501100000923
                Award ID: FT140100291
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review

                Neurosciences
                women,aggression,brain,hormones,intimate partner violence
                Neurosciences
                women, aggression, brain, hormones, intimate partner violence

                Comments

                Comment on this article