15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Radiomics is an objective method for extracting quantitative information from medical images. However, in radiomics, standardization, overfitting, and generalization are major challenges to be overcome. Test–retest experiments can be used to select robust radiomic features that have minimal variation. Currently, it is unknown whether they should be identified for each disease (disease specific) or are only imaging device-specific (computed tomography [CT]-specific). Here, we performed a test–retest analysis on CT scans of 40 patients with rectal cancer in a clinical setting. Correlation between radiomic features was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). In total, only 9/542 features have a CCC > 0.85. Furthermore, results were compared with the test–retest results on CT scans of 27 patients with lung cancer with a 15-minute interval. Results show that 446/542 features have a higher CCC for the test–retest analysis of the data set of patients with lung cancer than for patients with rectal cancer. The importance of controlling factors such as scanners, imaging protocol, reconstruction methods, and time points in a radiomics analysis is shown. Moreover, the results imply that test–retest analyses should be performed before each radiomics study. More research is required to independently evaluate the effect of each factor.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

          L Lin (1989)
          A new reproducibility index is developed and studied. This index is the correlation between the two readings that fall on the 45 degree line through the origin. It is simple to use and possesses desirable properties. The statistical properties of this estimate can be satisfactorily evaluated using an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation. A Monte Carlo experiment with 5,000 runs was performed to confirm the estimate's validity. An application using actual data is given.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer.

            To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis

              FDG-PET-derived textural features describing intra-tumor heterogeneity are increasingly investigated as imaging biomarkers. As part of the process of quantifying heterogeneity, image intensities (SUVs) are typically resampled into a reduced number of discrete bins. We focused on the implications of the manner in which this discretization is implemented. Two methods were evaluated: (1) RD, dividing the SUV range into D equally spaced bins, where the intensity resolution (i.e. bin size) varies per image; and (2) RB, maintaining a constant intensity resolution B. Clinical feasibility was assessed on 35 lung cancer patients, imaged before and in the second week of radiotherapy. Forty-four textural features were determined for different D and B for both imaging time points. Feature values depended on the intensity resolution and out of both assessed methods, RB was shown to allow for a meaningful inter- and intra-patient comparison of feature values. Overall, patients ranked differently according to feature values–which was used as a surrogate for textural feature interpretation–between both discretization methods. Our study shows that the manner of SUV discretization has a crucial effect on the resulting textural features and the interpretation thereof, emphasizing the importance of standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Tomography
                Tomography
                TOMOG
                Tomography
                Grapho Publications, LLC (Ann Abor, Michigan )
                2379-1381
                2379-139X
                December 2016
                : 2
                : 4
                : 361-365
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands;
                [2 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China; and
                [3 ]Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, China
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Janna E. van Timmeren, MSc Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Dr. Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands; E-mail: janita.vantimmeren@ 123456maastro.nl
                Article
                TOM-00208-16
                10.18383/j.tom.2016.00208
                6037932
                30042967
                30e26a0e-c4b0-4d87-919c-24f59a1345f9
                © 2016 The Authors. Published by Grapho Publications, LLC

                This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Research Articles

                radiomics,test–retest,computed tomography
                radiomics, test–retest, computed tomography

                Comments

                Comment on this article