11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Growth performance, and enteric and manure greenhouse gas emissions from Murrah calves fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The present study investigated the effects of different dietary forage to concentrate ratios on animal performance, and enteric and manure greenhouse gas emissions in growing calves. Fifteen male Murrah calves (153.5 ± 18.17 kg; 6 to 12 months) were randomly assigned to 3 dietary treatments and fed corn fodder, wheat straw and concentrate in 3 different proportions: 20:60:20 (C20); 20:40:40 (C40) and 10:30:60 (C60), for a period of 120 days. Increasing dietary concentrate proportion had no significant ( P > 0.05) effect on dry matter intake (DMI) but increased crude protein (CP) and total digestible nutrient intake ( P < 0.05). Average daily gain and feed conversion efficiency were significantly higher ( P < 0.05) for C60 compared with C20 and for C40, these did not differ with C20 and C60 ( P > 0.05). The apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter and CP were higher ( P < 0.05), but acid detergent fiber digestibility was lower ( P < 0.05) for C60 compared with C20 whereas, ether extract and neutral detergent fiber digestibilities were not affected ( P > 0.05). Daily methane (CH 4) emission (g/d), CH 4 energy loss (MJ/d) and CH 4 yield (CH 4 g/kg organic matter intake [OMI], CH 4 g/kg digestible OMI, and CH 4 % of metabolizable energy intake) were significantly higher for C20 compared with C60 ( P < 0.05). Methane yield as g/kg DMI although lower for C60 compared with C20 but the difference was not significant ( P > 0.05). Manure CH 4 (g/kg DMI) and nitrous oxide (N 2O mg/kg nitrogen) emissions were not affected ( P > 0.05), but N 2O emission on mg/kg DM basis was significantly higher ( P < 0.05) from the manure of calves fed C60 than that for C20. Thus, increasing dietary concentrate proportion improved animal performance, and reduced enteric CH 4 emission (g/day) without any significant effect on manure N 2O (mg/kg nitrogen) and CH 4 emissions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Methane emissions from cattle.

          Increasing atmospheric concentrations of methane have led scientists to examine its sources of origin. Ruminant livestock can produce 250 to 500 L of methane per day. This level of production results in estimates of the contribution by cattle to global warming that may occur in the next 50 to 100 yr to be a little less than 2%. Many factors influence methane emissions from cattle and include the following: level of feed intake, type of carbohydrate in the diet, feed processing, addition of lipids or ionophores to the diet, and alterations in the ruminal microflora. Manipulation of these factors can reduce methane emissions from cattle. Many techniques exist to quantify methane emissions from individual or groups of animals. Enclosure techniques are precise but require trained animals and may limit animal movement. Isotopic and nonisotopic tracer techniques may also be used effectively. Prediction equations based on fermentation balance or feed characteristics have been used to estimate methane production. These equations are useful, but the assumptions and conditions that must be met for each equation limit their ability to accurately predict methane production. Methane production from groups of animals can be measured by mass balance, micrometeorological, or tracer methods. These techniques can measure methane emissions from animals in either indoor or outdoor enclosures. Use of these techniques and knowledge of the factors that impact methane production can result in the development of mitigation strategies to reduce methane losses by cattle. Implementation of these strategies should result in enhanced animal productivity and decreased contributions by cattle to the atmospheric methane budget.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle.

            M Allen (2000)
            Physical and chemical characteristics of dietary ingredients and their interactions can have a large effect on dry matter intake (DMI) of lactating cows. Physical limitations caused by distension of the reticulo-rumen or other compartments of the gastrointestinal tract often limit DMI of high producing cows or cows fed high forage diets. Fermentation acids also limit DMI from a combination of increased osmolality in the reticulo-rumen and specific effects of propionate, although the mechanisms are not clear. The specific physical and chemical characteristics of diets that can affect DMI include fiber content, ease of hydrolysis of starch and fiber, particle size, particle fragility, silage fermentation products, concentration and characteristics of fat, and the amount and ruminal degradation of protein. Site of starch digestion affects the form of metabolic fuel absorbed, which can affect DMI because absorbed propionate appears to be more hypophagic than lactate or absorbed glucose. Dry matter intake is likely determined by integration of signals in brain satiety centers. Difficulty in measurement and extensive interactions among the variables make it challenging to account for dietary effects when predicting DMI. However, a greater understanding of the mechanisms along with evaluation of animal responses to diet changes allows diet adjustments to be made to optimize DMI as well as to optimize allocation of diet ingredients to animals. This paper discusses some of the characteristics of dietary ingredients that should be considered when formulating diets for lactating dairy cows and when allocating feeds to different groups of animals on the farm.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diet effects on urine composition of cattle and N2O emissions.

              Ruminant production contributes to emissions of nitrogen (N) to the environment, principally ammonia (NH3), nitrous oxide (N2O) and di-nitrogen (N2) to air, nitrate (NO3 -) to groundwater and particulate N to surface waters. Variation in dietary N intake will particularly affect excretion of urinary N, which is much more vulnerable to losses than is faecal N. Our objective is to review dietary effects on the level and form of N excreted in cattle urine, as well as its consequences for emissions of N2O. The quantity of N excreted in urine varies widely. Urinary N excretion, in particular that of urea N, is decreased upon reduction of dietary N intake or an increase in the supply of energy to the rumen microorganisms and to the host animal itself. Most of the N in urine (from 50% to well over 90%) is present in the form of urea. Other nitrogenous components include purine derivatives (PD), hippuric acid, creatine and creatinine. Excretion of PD is related to rumen microbial protein synthesis, and that of hippuric acid to dietary concentration of degradable phenolic acids. The N concentration of cattle urine ranges from 3 to 20 g/l. High-dietary mineral levels increase urine volume and lead to reduced urinary N concentration as well as reduced urea concentration in plasma and milk. In lactating dairy cattle, variation in urine volume affects the relationship between milk urea and urinary N excretion, which hampers the use of milk urea as an accurate indicator of urinary N excretion. Following its deposition in pastures or in animal houses, ubiquitous microorganisms in soil and waters transform urinary N components into ammonium (NH4 +), and thereafter into NO3 - and ultimately in N2 accompanied with the release of N2O. Urinary hippuric acid, creatine and creatinine decompose more slowly than urea. Hippuric acid may act as a natural inhibitor of N2O emissions, but inhibition conditions have not been defined properly yet. Environmental and soil conditions at the site of urine deposition or manure application strongly influence N2O release. Major dietary strategies to mitigating N2O emission from cattle operations include reducing dietary N content or increasing energy content, and increasing dietary mineral content to increase urine volume. For further reduction of N2O emission, an integrated animal nutrition and excreta management approach is required.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Anim Nutr
                Anim Nutr
                Animal Nutrition
                KeAi Publishing
                2405-6545
                2405-6383
                17 February 2018
                June 2018
                17 February 2018
                : 4
                : 2
                : 215-221
                Affiliations
                [a ]Division of Animal Nutrition, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132001, India
                [b ]Division of Animal Physiology, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132001, India
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. madhummd@ 123456yahoo.co.in
                Article
                S2405-6545(17)30110-5
                10.1016/j.aninu.2018.01.009
                6104573
                30eb6812-180b-4370-b787-5c76c03d5f93
                © 2018 Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 27 May 2017
                : 28 January 2018
                : 30 January 2018
                Categories
                Ruminant and Herbivore Nutrition

                concentrate proportion,growth,digestibility,manure,methane,nitrous oxide

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content45

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors561