87
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV at a Patient’s First Clinic Visit: The RapIT Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          High rates of patient attrition from care between HIV testing and antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation have been documented in sub-Saharan Africa, contributing to persistently low CD4 cell counts at treatment initiation. One reason for this is that starting ART in many countries is a lengthy and burdensome process, imposing long waits and multiple clinic visits on patients. We estimated the effect on uptake of ART and viral suppression of an accelerated initiation algorithm that allowed treatment-eligible patients to be dispensed their first supply of antiretroviral medications on the day of their first HIV-related clinic visit.

          Methods and Findings

          RapIT (Rapid Initiation of Treatment) was an unblinded randomized controlled trial of single-visit ART initiation in two public sector clinics in South Africa, a primary health clinic (PHC) and a hospital-based HIV clinic. Adult (≥18 y old), non-pregnant patients receiving a positive HIV test or first treatment-eligible CD4 count were randomized to standard or rapid initiation. Patients in the rapid-initiation arm of the study (“rapid arm”) received a point-of-care (POC) CD4 count if needed; those who were ART-eligible received a POC tuberculosis (TB) test if symptomatic, POC blood tests, physical exam, education, counseling, and antiretroviral (ARV) dispensing. Patients in the standard-initiation arm of the study (“standard arm”) followed standard clinic procedures (three to five additional clinic visits over 2–4 wk prior to ARV dispensing). Follow up was by record review only. The primary outcome was viral suppression, defined as initiated, retained in care, and suppressed (≤400 copies/ml) within 10 mo of study enrollment. Secondary outcomes included initiation of ART ≤90 d of study enrollment, retention in care, time to ART initiation, patient-level predictors of primary outcomes, prevalence of TB symptoms, and the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. A survival analysis was conducted comparing attrition from care after ART initiation between the groups among those who initiated within 90 d. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were enrolled in the study between May 8, 2013 and August 29, 2014 (median CD4 count 210 cells/mm 3). In the rapid arm, 119/187 patients (64%) initiated treatment and were virally suppressed at 10 mo, compared to 96/190 (51%) in the standard arm (relative risk [RR] 1.26 [1.05–1.50]). In the rapid arm 182/187 (97%) initiated ART ≤90 d, compared to 136/190 (72%) in the standard arm (RR 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24–1.49). Among 318 patients who did initiate ART within 90 d, the hazard of attrition within the first 10 mo did not differ between the treatment arms (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; 95% CI 0.61–1.84). The study was limited by the small number of sites and small sample size, and the generalizability of the results to other settings and to non-research conditions is uncertain.

          Conclusions

          Offering single-visit ART initiation to adult patients in South Africa increased uptake of ART by 36% and viral suppression by 26%. This intervention should be considered for adoption in the public sector in Africa.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01710397, and South African National Clinical Trials Register DOH-27-0213-4177.

          Abstract

          In the RapIT randomized controlled trial, Sydney Rosen and colleagues investigate whether accelerated initiation of antiretroviral therapy can improve viral suppression for HIV patients in South Africa.

          Author Summary

          Why Was This Study Done?
          • One of the most persistent operational challenges facing antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs for HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa is late presentation of patients for care and high rates of attrition from care between HIV testing and ART initiation.

          • One reason for this is that starting ART in many countries is a lengthy and burdensome process, imposing long waits and multiple clinic visits on patients; in South Africa, the country with the world’s largest HIV treatment program, patients must typically make five or six clinic visits, starting with an HIV test, before they receive medications.

          • There have not yet been any controlled evaluations of an integrated, rapid HIV treatment initiation algorithm that allows patients to initiate ART in a single clinic visit, so the RapIT trial was done to find out if “same-day initiation” of ART would increase the number of patients starting treatment and improve overall health outcomes, compared to current practices.

          What Did the Researchers Do and Find?
          • We randomly assigned 377 adult patients at two public clinics in Johannesburg, South Africa, who had provided consent to participate in the study to one of two groups.

          • Patients in the group assigned to receive rapid treatment initiation were offered the chance to start treatment on the same day as their first clinic visit, using rapid, point-of-care laboratory tests and an accelerated sequence of other steps, including a physical exam, education, and counseling.

          • Patients in the group assigned to receive standard treatment initiation followed the standard schedule for treatment initiation used by the clinics, which usually required three to five additional clinic visits over a 2–4 wk period.

          • After the study enrollment visit, patients were followed up by reviewing their regular clinic medical records, to determine how many did start treatment and how many were still in care and had good outcomes, as indicated by a suppressed viral load, 10 mo later.

          • We found that 97% of patients in the rapid initiation group had started ART by 90 d after study enrollment—three-quarters of them on the same day—compared to 72% of patients in the standard initiation group.

          • By 10 mo after study enrollment, 64% of patients in the rapid group had good outcomes compared to 51% in the standard group.

          • Rapid initiation group patients spent roughly two and a half hours in the clinic to complete all the steps required before they got their medications.

          What Do These Findings Mean?
          • The RapIT (Rapid Initiation of Treatment) trial showed that it is possible to initiate nearly all eligible patients on HIV therapy, and to do so in a much shorter time interval than previously required.

          • By showing that offering the opportunity to start treatment on the spot, without delay, overcomes many barriers patients would otherwise face, this study demonstrates that same-day ART initiation is an effective strategy for improving health outcomes.

          • More patients in the rapid initiation group dropped out of care after starting treatment than in the standard initiation group; although the rapid initiation group still had better health outcomes overall, adherence support after starting treatment remains essential.

          • The findings of this study are limited because the study took place in only two clinics in one part of South Africa and was carried out by study staff, not by regular clinic staff.

          • Based on this study’s results, consideration could be given to accelerating the process of ART initiation in many different settings and for different types of patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of point-of-care CD4 cell count tests on retention of patients and rates of antiretroviral therapy initiation in primary health clinics: an observational cohort study.

          Loss to follow-up of HIV-positive patients before initiation of antiretroviral therapy can exceed 50% in low-income settings and is a challenge to the scale-up of treatment. We implemented point-of-care counting of CD4 cells in Mozambique and assessed the effect on loss to follow-up before immunological staging and treatment initiation. In this observational cohort study, data for enrolment into HIV management and initiation of antiretroviral therapy were extracted retrospectively from patients' records at four primary health clinics providing HIV treatment and point-of-care CD4 services. Loss to follow-up and the duration of each preparatory step before treatment initiation were measured and compared with baseline data from before the introduction of point-of-care CD4 testing. After the introduction of point-of-care CD4 the proportion of patients lost to follow-up before completion of CD4 staging dropped from 57% (278 of 492) to 21% (92 of 437) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·2, 95% CI 0·15-0·27). Total loss to follow-up before initiation of antiretroviral treatment fell from 64% (314 of 492) to 33% (142 of 437) (OR 0·27, 95% CI 0·21-0·36) and the proportion of enrolled patients initiating antiretroviral therapy increased from 12% (57 of 492) to 22% (94 of 437) (OR 2·05, 95% CI 1·42-2·96). The median time from enrolment to antiretroviral therapy initiation reduced from 48 days to 20 days (p<0·0001), primarily because of a reduction in the median time taken to complete CD4 staging, which decreased from 32 days to 3 days (p<0·0001). Loss to follow-up between staging and antiretroviral therapy initiation did not change significantly (OR 0·84, 95% CI 0·49-1·45). Point-of-care CD4 testing enabled clinics to stage patients rapidly on-site after enrolment, which reduced opportunities for pretreatment loss to follow-up. As a result, more patients were identified as eligible for and initiated antiretroviral treatment. Point-of-care testing might therefore be an effective intervention to reduce pretreatment loss to follow-up. Absolute Return for Kids and UNITAID. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trends in CD4 count at presentation to care and treatment initiation in sub-Saharan Africa, 2002-2013: a meta-analysis.

            Both population- and individual-level benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are contingent on early diagnosis and initiation of therapy. We estimated trends in disease status at presentation to care and at ART initiation in sub-Saharan Africa. We searched PubMed for studies published January 2002-December 2013 that reported CD4 cell count at presentation or ART initiation among adults in sub-Saharan Africa. We abstracted study sample size, year(s), and mean CD4 count. A random-effects meta-regression model was used to obtain pooled estimates during each year of the observation period. We identified 56 articles reporting CD4 count at presentation (N = 295 455) and 71 articles reporting CD4 count at ART initiation (N = 549 702). The mean estimated CD4 count in 2002 was 251 cells/µL at presentation and 152 cells/µL at ART initiation. During 2002-2013, neither CD4 count at presentation (β = 5.8 cells/year; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.7 to 22.4 cells/year), nor CD4 count at ART initiation (β = -1.1 cells/year; 95% CI, -8.4 to 6.2 cells/year) increased significantly. Excluding studies of opportunistic infections or prevention of mother-to-child transmission did not alter our findings. Among studies conducted in South Africa (N = 14), CD4 count at presentation increased by 39.9 cells/year (95% CI, 9.2-70.2 cells/year; P = .02), but CD4 count at ART initiation did not change. CD4 counts at presentation to care and at ART initiation in sub-Saharan Africa have not increased over the past decade. Barriers to presentation, diagnosis, and linkage to HIV care remain major challenges that require attention to optimize population-level benefits of ART. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Impact and Cost of Scaling up GeneXpert MTB/RIF in South Africa

              Objective We estimated the incremental cost and impact on diagnosis and treatment uptake of national rollout of Xpert MTB/RIF technology (Xpert) for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB above the cost of current guidelines for the years 2011 to 2016 in South Africa. Methods We parameterised a population-level decision model with data from national-level TB databases (n = 199,511) and implementation studies. The model follows cohorts of TB suspects from diagnosis to treatment under current diagnostic guidelines or an algorithm that includes Xpert. Assumptions include the number of TB suspects, symptom prevalence of 5.5%, annual suspect growth rate of 10%, and 2010 public-sector salaries and drug and service delivery costs. Xpert test costs are based on data from an in-country pilot evaluation and assumptions about when global volumes allowing cartridge discounts will be reached. Results At full scale, Xpert will increase the number of TB cases diagnosed per year by 30%–37% and the number of MDR-TB cases diagnosed by 69%–71%. It will diagnose 81% of patients after the first visit, compared to 46% currently. The cost of TB diagnosis per suspect will increase by 55% to USD 60–61 and the cost of diagnosis and treatment per TB case treated by 8% to USD 797–873. The incremental capital cost of the Xpert scale-up will be USD 22 million and the incremental recurrent cost USD 287–316 million over six years. Conclusion Xpert will increase both the number of TB cases diagnosed and treated and the cost of TB diagnosis. These results do not include savings due to reduced transmission of TB as a result of earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Med
                PLoS Med
                plos
                plosmed
                PLoS Medicine
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1549-1277
                1549-1676
                10 May 2016
                May 2016
                : 13
                : 5
                : e1002015
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [2 ]Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [4 ]Health Department, City of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
                Rwanda Ministry of Health, RWANDA
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: SR LL MM IS MPF. Performed the experiments: CN CM DB CS JR. Analyzed the data: MM GM SR. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: SR MM. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: SR MM LL MPF. Enrolled patients: CN. Agree with the manuscript’s results and conclusions: SR MM LL MPF CN CM GM IS DB CS JR. All authors have read, and confirm that they meet, ICMJE criteria for authorship.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-880X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5800-1960
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1180-8764
                Article
                PMEDICINE-D-15-03455
                10.1371/journal.pmed.1002015
                4862681
                27163694
                30f3263d-b057-4139-a2f6-e60ba43f3b61
                © 2016 Rosen et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 17 November 2015
                : 22 March 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000060, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases;
                Award ID: 1U01AI100015
                Award Recipient :
                Funding for this study was provided by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) under the terms of grant 1U01AI100015 to Boston University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Antiviral Therapy
                Antiretroviral Therapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Antiviral Therapy
                Antiretroviral Therapy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Preventive Medicine
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Antiviral Therapy
                Antiretroviral Therapy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical Microbiology
                Microbial Pathogens
                Viral Pathogens
                Immunodeficiency Viruses
                HIV
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Pathogens
                Microbial Pathogens
                Viral Pathogens
                Immunodeficiency Viruses
                HIV
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                Viral Pathogens
                Immunodeficiency Viruses
                HIV
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                Immunodeficiency Viruses
                HIV
                Biology and life sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                RNA viruses
                Retroviruses
                Lentivirus
                HIV
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical Microbiology
                Microbial Pathogens
                Viral Pathogens
                Retroviruses
                Lentivirus
                HIV
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Pathogens
                Microbial Pathogens
                Viral Pathogens
                Retroviruses
                Lentivirus
                HIV
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Viruses
                Viral Pathogens
                Retroviruses
                Lentivirus
                HIV
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Africa
                South Africa
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Blood Counts
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Blood Counts
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Blood Counts
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Body Fluids
                Blood
                Blood Counts
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Hematology
                Blood
                Blood Counts
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Nurses
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Nurses
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Virology
                Viral Transmission and Infection
                Viral Load
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Bacterial Diseases
                Tuberculosis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Tropical Diseases
                Tuberculosis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmaceutics
                Drug Therapy
                Custom metadata
                Data will be made publicly available in the Dryad repository ( http://www.datadryad.org/) after the protocol has been closed (anticipated closure June 2018). Until then, data will remain under the supervision of the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). Requests should be sent to the HREC Research Administrator at: https://www.wits.ac.za/research/about-our-research/ethics-and-research-integrity/human-research-ethics-committee-medical/.

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log