37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      EFECTOS DE LA PANDEMIA POR COVID-19 EN LA ATENCIÓN DE PERSONAS CON DISCAPACIDAD PSICOSOCIAL: PERSPECTIVA DE TRABAJADORES Translated title: COVID-19 pandemic effects on the care of people with psychosocial disabilities: workers’ perspective

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN La pandemia de COVID-19 alteró el funcionamiento de los sistemas de salud y, particularmente, la provisión de servicios destinados a personas con discapacidad psicosocial de un modo pendiente de análisis en Argentina. El objetivo fue caracterizar los efectos de la pandemia de COVID-19 en los servicios de atención dirigidos a personas con discapacidad psicosocial en Rosario (Santa Fe), Resistencia (Chaco) y el Área Metropolitana de Buenos Aires desde la perspectiva de sus trabajadores durante 2020-2021 MÉTODOS Se realizó un estudio exploratorio y descriptivo a partir de entrevistas a 53 trabajadores de tres tipos de servicios de rehabilitación (orientados a dar apoyo para la socialización, el trabajo o la vivienda), en dos momentos (fin de 2020 y mediados de 2021). Se calcularon frecuencias y se realizó un análisis temático RESULTADOS Hubo una afectación amplia y duradera de los servicios, que se tornaron menos accesibles y eficaces para contribuir a la rehabilitación. Se observaron aspectos comunes, como la adaptación para seguir funcionando, la centralidad de la tecnología y el impacto subjetivo en los trabajadores, marcado por el cansancio. Al año de la pandemia, dos tercios de los servicios orientados a la socialización estaban muy afectados o cerrados DISCUSIÓN A partir de la descripción y análisis de cómo se vieron afectados los servicios de rehabilitación, se abre el interrogante respecto de su futuro y el rumbo que tomará la reforma en salud mental. ^s+

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic produced a reorganization of health systems and, in particular, affected the provision of services for people with psychosocial disabilities in a way that was pending an analysis in Argentina. The objective was to characterize the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on services aimed at people with psychosocial disabilities in the cities of Rosario (Santa Fe), Resistencia (Chaco) and the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires from the perspective of their workers during 2020-2021 METHODS An exploratory and descriptive study was carried out by interviewing 53 workers from three types of rehabilitation services (aimed at providing support for socialization, for work or for housing) in two moments (November-December 2020 and April-June 2021). Frequencies were calculated and a thematic analysis was performed RESULTS The impact on services was broad and long-lasting, they became less accessible and effective in contributing to rehabilitation. Common aspects such as the new centrality of technology, massive adaptations and deep subjective impact on workers marked by fatigue were observed. Within a year of the pandemic, two-thirds of socialization-oriented services were still severely affected or closed DISCUSSION From the description and analysis of how the rehabilitation services were affected, the question remains regarding their future and how the mental health reform will unfold.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Progression of Mental Health Services during the COVID-19 Outbreak in China

          The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been rapidly transmitted in China, Macau, Hong Kong, and other Asian and European counterparts. This COVID-19 epidemic has aroused increasing attention nationwide. Patients, health professionals, and the general public are under insurmountable psychological pressure which may lead to various psychological problems, such as anxiety, fear, depression, and insomnia. Psychological crisis intervention plays a pivotal role in the overall deployment of the disease control. The National Health Commission of China has summoned a call for emergency psychological crisis intervention and thus, various mental health associations and organizations have established expert teams to compile guidelines and public health educational articles/videos for mental health professionals and the general public alongside with online mental health services. In addition, mental health professionals and expert groups are stationed in designated isolation hospitals to provide on-site services. Experts have reached a consensus on the admission of patients with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 outbreak in mental health institutions. Nevertheless, the rapid transmission of the COVID-19 has emerged to mount a serious challenge to the mental health service in China.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Human rights violations of people with mental and psychosocial disabilities: an unresolved global crisis.

            This report reviews the evidence for the types of human rights violations experienced by people with mental and psychosocial disabilities in low-income and middle-income countries as well as strategies to prevent these violations and promote human rights in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The article draws on the views, expertise, and experience of 51 people with mental and psychosocial disabilities from 18 low-income and middle-income countries as well as a review of English language literature including from UN publications, non-governmental organisation reports, press reports, and the academic literature. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              COVID-19: maintaining essential rehabilitation services across the care continuum

              Summary box Rehabilitation services are essential: They need to continue during a pandemic and after as they are an essential component of high-value care offered for individuals across the lifespan to optimise physical and cognitive functioning to reduce disability. Rehabilitation care is affected: Globally, the response to COVID-19 is shifting rehabilitation services provided in all settings, introducing new burden on patients, families and healthcare workers. Measurement needed: A core set of measures needs to be adopted to monitor the health and functional outcomes for COVID-19 and other patients at risk for functional decline and to assess the quality, availability and accessibility of services today and as our nations recover. Telerehabilitation is necessary: Remote delivery of care and the necessary rapid scale-up of telehealth could be optimised if financial, infrastructure, resource, training and cybersecurity barriers were addressed. Collaboration can support needs in the home: Novel partnerships that include the rehabilitation community could enhance communication and delivery of safe and effective home-based rehabilitative strategies to mitigate the consequences of COVID-19 and reduced service capacity. Direct care providers need personal protective equipment: Rehabilitation providers in all settings should be ensured personal protective equipment and training to use it effectively. Introduction COVID-19 is overwhelming healthcare services and healthcare workers globally. The response, appropriately, is on the ability to care for people who become critically ill, protect their carers and keep people physically distanced. However, this response has shifted what is considered and how to provide essential healthcare services. Rehabilitation services, which optimise physical and cognitive functioning to reduce disability, are a core component of high-value care.1 The decisions to shift, transform, delay or discontinue rehabilitation care are complex. These decisions have societal implications for today and the future. This commentary describes adjustments to the continuum of rehabilitation services across 12 low-income, middle-income and high-income countries in the context of national COVID-19 preparedness responses (table 1) and provides recommendations for decision makers on the provision and payment of these essential services. Table 1 Continuum of rehabilitation services across 12 low-income, middle-income and high-income countries in the context of national COVID-19 preparedness recommendations Country National government mandated COVID-19 response Rehabilitation services during COVID-19*(inpatient, redeployment/bed shift, outpatient/home and telehealth) Stay-at-home order 2020 National response Guidance for ‘non-essential’ healthcare services Argentina 20 March National lockdown:essential trips for cleaning supplies, medicines and food. Outpatient suspended. Inpatient rehabilitation still offered in reduced capacity.Other inpatient bed types converted to increase acute hospital bed capacity.Patients are not attending day rehabilitation programmes despite programmes being open.All outpatients clinics in all public and private hospitals closed.Physicians and therapists cannot get reimbursed for video telehealth visits (neither video nor telephone). Belgium 17 March  Containment and mitigation: school and retail closures, ban on all gatherings, movement only for essential needs and ban on non-essential international travel. Non-essential services suspended. Inpatient rehabilitation operational but discharging more quickly to prevent spread; all activities in patients’ room.Rehabilitation personnel but not beds have shifted to support acute care.All outpatient rehabilitation services discontinued.Government-approved renumeration for telerehabilitation for all provider types (expanded for COVID-19). Brazil By state  Containment and mitigation: national guidance defined essential services and recommendations for social distancing and foreign entry restricted. Non-essential services suspended. Reduced operations for inpatient rehabilitation.Shift in rehabilitation personnel and outpatient services, encouraged to use telemedicine.Federal Council of Medicine acknowledges use of telemedicine for teleorientation (distance guidance, training and patient referral), telemonitoring under medical supervision or guidance and teleinterconsultation (between physicians for diagnostic or therapeutic assistance). China 23 January Lockdowns across country: suspension of travel, banned public gatherings, early detection and isolation, mobility restrictions and quarantine for returning migrant workers. Non-essential services suspended. Inpatient rehabilitation for all non-urgent patients suspended.Shift in rehabilitation hospital beds or rehabilitation personnel to help with COVID-19 response.Outpatient rehabilitation suspended.All home care discontinued.Teleconsultation/virtual rehabilitation provided mostly free of charge. Germany 22 March  Containment and mitigation: travel restrictions, school closure, closing non-essential businesses and banned public gatherings. All elective surgeries and non-essential services postponed. Acute hospitals continued early acute rehabilitation.Rehabilitation hospitals discontinued care for chronic, non-acute problems; acute patients (eg, surgery and stroke) stay as long as needed.Some rehabilitation hospitals could be designated as overflow hospitals. Rehabilitatation personnel supporting acute hospitals.Outpatient rehabilitation is reduced but available for high need patients/essential care.Telerehabilitation for physicians and health professionals in the acute COVID-19 phase possible and reimbursed. Guyana 16 March Encouraging social distancing and hygienic practices.Established health emergency operations centre.Curfew and stay-at-home policy implemented and all non-essential business ordered closed. All elective surgeries and non-essential services postponed. Inpatient rehabilitation continued in acute hospitals.Outpatient rehabilitation therapists reassigned to acute hospitals.All community-based rehabilitation suspended in hinterland regions.Phased approach to cancelling/closing all outpatient rehabilitation services; patients receive self-led home-based programme.Telerehabilitation via telephone, Zoom, WhatsApp and emailing exercise programs. Also using MedBridge. India 24 March National lockdown: exceptions medical and pharma services, groceries, banks, telecom, gas stations as essential services, school closures and restriction of international and most domestic travel. Non-essential elective surgeries postponed Hospitals discharging stable patients at earliest possible.Inpatient rehabilitation continued for patients who cannot return or travel home.Rehabilitation personnel considered part of human resource mobilisation for training and possible role assignments.Outpatient and home-based rehabilitation suspended.Telerehabilitation via phone, Whatsapp and Zoom carried out by certain tertiary care and independent rehabilitation clinics especially for the neurologically ill patients. Singapore 7 April National lockdown: temp. screening, hospital and home quarantines, extensive tracing, social distancing, bans on large gatherings, schools closed and travel restricted. Non-essential appointments, including elective procedures and outpatient rehabilitation, deferred. Inpatient rehabilitation continued but location shifted outside of acute hospitals into stand-alone rehabilitation (community) hospitals. Focus on intensive care, cardiopulmonary and severe, new onset disability.A significant proportion of outpatient providers shifted to inpatient.Limited outpatient rehabilitation personnel focused on postacute and shifted to small teams for physical distancing.All group and community-based rehabilitation activities suspended including day rehabilitation and senior activity centres.Home rehabilitation requests subject to review by health authorities, restricted to patients with significant new-disability and limited caregiver support.In-hospital rehabilitation consults and multidisciplinary team meetings through teleconference.Providers trained to deliver teleconsultations with national regulatory guidance for quality and cybersecurity. Spain 14 March National lockdown: exceptions medical and pharmacy services, groceries and banks. School closures and restriction of international travel. Non-essential services suspended, non-urgent surgeries postponed and outpatient clinics closed. Inpatient rehabilitation offered in reduced capacity.Rehabilitation beds shifted to extend capacity of acute care.Outpatient rehabilitation programmes suspended. All outpatient clinics in all public and private hospitals closed.The majority of home-based rehabilitation (but not completely) suspended.Physicians and therapists cannot get reimbursed specifically for telehealth visits (neither video nor telephone as of 23 April). In some contexts (eg, Catalonia) the Board of Physical Therapists organised a task force of volunteer physical therapists who can deliver some telephone-based rehabilitation. (Provision of healthcare is regulated and reimbursed regionally.) Tanzania Local only  Containment and mitigation: public gatherings ban, 30-day closure of schools, universities, training institutions, health screening at points of entry, 14-day quarantine for travellers from high-risk countries.  Local KCMC. Example: care for older adults suspended unless an emergency, outpatient block appointments, reduced elective surgeries and prioritised emergency surgeries. Inpatient rehabilitation offered but length of stay and visitors reduced to prevent hospital acquired infection (affecting amount of time therapists have to evaluate and treat patients+train family for home-based rehabilitation).Shift in rehabilitation personnel with those age >55 years exempt from patient contact.Outpatient rehabilitation appointments scheduled in blocks to avoid overcrowding and congestion especially in waiting areas.Telehealth not a standard of practice for rehabilitation (and not covered by insurance); patients discharged early and appointments delayed/cancelled have limited access to care. USA By state or city Stay at home orders, school closures, bans of mass gatherings and non-essential business closures. Recommendations to postpone all elective surgeries and non-urgent procedures and visits. Fewer rehabilitation beds; beds converted for acute care.Shift in rehabilitation personnel to acute inpatient and telemedicine follow-up.Outpatient rehabilitation available only for high need patients following. CDC recommendations for essential care.Rehabilitation teleconsultations. Slow scale to virtual visits. Physicians reimbursed. Therapists reimbursed by some private insurers but not reimbursed by government insurance until 30 April. UK 23 March National lockdown: only leave home for food, health reasons, work and other travel restrictions.Social distancing and personal hygiene guidelines. Non-urgent surgeries postponed. Hospital inpatients medically fit discharged early; inpatient rehabilitation offered in reduced capacity.Shift in rehabilitation hospital beds to maximise inpatient capacity; shift in rehabilitation personnel to provide greater acute hospital and community service support.Outpatient rehabilitation at reduced capacity.Telephone and digital/video-based consultation. *Authors provided reports of rehabilitation practice in the absence of national policies. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; KCMC, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center. Changes to rehabilitation care across settings Rehabilitation addresses health and functioning for individuals across the lifespan. The immediacy of care needs varies by condition.2 Services are provided in every setting—acute hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals, outpatient clinics, in the community and in people’s homes—and resources vary by region. Guidance for the delivery of rehabilitation during COVID-19 is available for physiotherapy but not yet all rehabilitation professions.3 Several regions reported fewer non-urgent rehabilitation patient admissions in order to expand acute care bed capacity. Lengths of inpatient stays for patients who receive rehabilitation are now shorter in several countries including Belgium, India, Tanzania and the UK. Shorter inpatient stays reduce the time available to assess and treat patients and train family. Any need for continued home-based care has implications for caregivers particularly while social distancing. In addition to shorter lengths of inpatient stays, all 12 countries report outpatient and home-based rehabilitation care suspended or operating at reduced service capacity. These inevitable decisions for protection of both healthcare workers and the general public may result in increases in disability and morbidity from a lack of necessary rehabilitation care to those with continued care needs. Patients at home with limited ability to move independently or facilitate their own self-care activities, and patients with prolonged hospitalisation for COVID-19 who have returned home, are at high risk of several adverse health effects. Skin breakdown, muscle weakness, joint stiffness, reduced range of motion, changes to bowel and bladder functioning, venous stasis, oedema, decreased rate of metabolism and respiratory movement, lowered mood and depression are measurable in the first week of limited mobility. It is critical that public health communication continue to address the significance of daily activity and movement while uniquely considering limitations of individuals with significant physical or cognitive disability. Guidance needs to also ensure the safety of caregivers involved and be provided for households without available caregivers. Protecting providers of direct care While there is concern for people with unmet rehabilitation needs, it is important to protect all direct care providers, paid and unpaid, during a pandemic response. Many components of rehabilitation care require patient contact, for example, treating patients weaning from mechanical ventilation, developing patients’ balance techniques after stroke and fitting a new limb after amputation. Furthermore, rehabilitation personnel from Guyana to Singapore are being redeployed to meet needs in care settings different than their usual work environment. In Spain, health workers represent 15% of all COVID cases and, in response, the country has mobilised retirees, medical residents or other health personnel. In Singapore, private sector and retired rehabilitation staff may join frontline healthcare. In planning for adequate personal protective equipment and training for its use, governments need to include all direct care providers in their calculations to adequately protect people in homes and community-based settings when direct-patient contact is still necessary. Telerehabilitation Telephone consultation for care is an option in some regions but is dependent predominantly on the availability of personnel. Use of video visits and other forms of virtual care, although preferred for rehabilitation over telephone consultation alone, requires widespread and stable internet connectivity, availability of technology for both the rehabilitation provider and the patient, ‘tech literacy’ or the ability to use a device, the availability of ‘tech support’ to troubleshoot or first get connected and payment for provider time. Although rehabilitation in some countries such as Guyana, Germany and the UK is a component of universal healthcare coverage (UHC), governments and health insurers of other non-UHC countries need to pay therapists, in addition to physicians, to equitably provide care via telehealth. Use of telehealth under usual circumstances in all forms—text, telephone and video—requires planning, training and iterative improvement. It is imperative that experienced telehealth providers share protocols and become champions to support their peers with rapid scale-up in this challenging environment. Publications are emerging, and some professional societies are sharing guides for remote consultations.4 5 China and the USA have live webcast sessions with national experts to train rehabilitation providers and online communities to empower caregivers. Creative solutions to use free and commercially available communication tools like WeChat and WhatsApp are being used in Brazil, China and Guyana. These approaches are limited in Tanzania and likely other low-income countries due to costs for data plans and limited in-home internet access. With the majority of rehabilitation care provided remotely during a pandemic response, telehealth strategies need the infrastructure and to be resourced and financed appropriately. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 Enhanced measurement and monitoring are desperately needed at the individual, health system and national levels. With the release of the WHO Rehabilitation Guide for Action only this past year,6 few countries had fully completed a systematic assessment of the rehabilitation situation and developed a strategic plan to adequately meet rehabilitative needs prior to this pandemic or to activate during pandemics. Yet, today, we need alignment on a measurement strategy. Longitudinal assessments of health and functional outcomes are needed to monitor individual and population health and support clinical decision making for allocation of scarce resources in all settings. The global significance of measurement on practice and policy was evident in the release of COVID-19 outcomes assessments of intensive care unit patients7; similar data are needed on the functional recovery of patients with COVID-19. Service-level records need to be monitored to ensure adequate quality and equity with constrained resources. In the longer term, greater attention to national census and cohort surveys will be needed to detect changes in population health that can inform policy decisions on rehabilitation service needs and geographic disparities. The rehabilitation community needs to unite to consider a core set of measures to monitor recovery of patients with COVID-19, health of persons with disability and chronic conditions, and the quality, availability and accessibility of services today and as our nations recover. Recommendations Rehabilitation care is at a unique turning point. In 2017, the WHO had already noted ‘substantial and ever-increasing unmet need for rehabilitation services worldwide’.8 Today, we are faced with a new population of patients at risk of functional decline in addition to the disability pandemic already present among one billion people globally. We are providing care in new ways and standards of care are changing. The following recommendations are provided to mitigate the consequences of COVID-19’s impact on rehabilitation care and support continued health with reduced risk of disability. Governments need to include rehabilitation and other direct care providers in home-based and community-based settings in their plans for personal protective equipment acquisition and training. Global collaboration across rehabilitation professionals needs to accelerate the sharing of resources, instructional tools, education and training packets for how patients and families can continue rehabilitation at home during a pandemic response. Public health messaging on mental and physical health while social distancing needs to expand with input from rehabilitation professionals to provide guidance for persons living with physical and cognitive limitations, with and without caregivers. Public–private partnerships are needed to better support rapid scale of telehealth today and in the future to ensure effective use, financing, cybersecurity, access and increased reliability of broadband networks to reach people in low-resourced areas. The rehabilitation community needs to unite on measurement of care and outcomes because the evidence established in real world practice today could transform care and lives tomorrow. Conclusions The WHO called on nations to ensure continuity of essential services in parallel to scaling public health preparedness and response measures.9 Our shared experience is that national agencies did not issue specific guidance for the provision of rehabilitation. Considerations for service delivery balanced risk of transmission with both the availability of resources to provide care and the patient’s acuity, level of urgency and potential for harm if services were postponed or altered. Rehabilitation service providers mobilised quickly to provide the best, safest care possible to those in greatest need; decisions were in many cases made locally. Looking beyond the pandemic, rehabilitation needs to remain at the forefront of discussions for UHC; barriers to infrastructure, implementation and financing care via telehealth and alternative approaches need to be eliminated. Strong leadership for inclusion of rehabilitation in public health and healthcare policymaking is acutely needed to ensure high-value care and reduce the global burden of disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rasp
                Revista Argentina de Salud Pública
                Rev. argent. salud pública
                Ministerio de Salud de la Nación Argentina (Buenos Aires, , Argentina )
                1852-8724
                1853-810X
                February 2022
                : 14
                : suppl 1
                : 47
                Affiliations
                [2] orgnameUniversidad de Buenos Aires Argentina
                [3] Rosario Santa Fé orgnameUniversidad Nacional de Rosario Argentina
                [4] Resistencia Chaco orgnameCentro Integral de Salud Mental Comunitaria “La Casita” Argentina
                [1] Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires orgnameUniversidad de Buenos Aires Argentina
                Article
                S1853-810X2022000200047 S1853-810X(22)01400000047
                31054dd1-440d-454c-b2e1-34b594c2a17e

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 09 February 2022
                : 12 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 1
                Product

                SciELO Argentina

                Categories
                Artículos Originales

                Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica,COVID-19,Servicios de Salud para Personas con Discapacidad,Salud Mental,Sistemas de Apoyo Psicosocial,Health Services for Persons with Disabilities,Mental Health,Psychiatric Rehabilitation,Psychosocial Support Systems

                Comments

                Comment on this article