3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Avascular Spaces of the Female Pelvis—Clinical Applications in Obstetrics and Gynecology

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The term “spaces” refers to the areas delimited by at least two independent fasciae and filled with areolar connective tissue. However, there is discrepancy regarding the spaces and their limits between clinical anatomy and gynecologic surgery, as not every avascular space described in literature is delimited by at least two fasciae. Moreover, new spaces and surgical planes have been developed after the adoption of laparoscopy and nerve-sparing gynecological procedures. Avascular spaces are useful anatomical landmarks in retroperitoneal anatomic and pelvic surgery for both malignant and benign conditions. A noteworthy fact is that for various gynecological diseases, there are different approaches to the avascular spaces of the female pelvis. This is a significant difference, which is best demonstrated by dissection of these spaces for gynecological, urogynecological, and oncogynecological operations. Thorough knowledge regarding pelvic anatomy of these spaces is vital to minimize morbidity and mortality. In this article, we defined nine avascular female pelvic spaces—their boundaries, different approaches, attention during dissection, and applications in obstetrics and gynecology. We described the fourth space and separate the paravesical and pararectal space, as nerve-sparing gynecological procedures request a precise understanding of retroperitoneal spaces.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial.

          The weight of surgical radicality, together with a lack of anatomical theoretical basis for surgery and inappropriate practical skills, can lead to serious impairments to bladder, rectal, and sexual functions after laparoscopic excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Although the "classical" laparoscopic technique for endometriosis excision involving segmental bowel resection has proven to relieve symptoms successfully, it is hampered by several postoperative long-term and/or definitive pelvic dysfunctions. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the laparoscopic nerve-sparing approach to the classical laparoscopic procedure in a series of 126 cases. Satisfactory data for bowel, bladder, and sexual function were considered as primary endpoints. A total of 126 patients were considered for analysis: 61 treated with nerve-sparing radical excision of pelvic endometriosis with segmental bowel resection (group B), and 65 treated with the classical technique (group A). Intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. Mean days of self-catheterization were significantly lower in the nerve-sparing group (39.8 days) compared with the non-nerve-sparing group (121.1 days; p < 0.001). The relapse rate within 12 months after surgery was comparable between the two groups. Patients of group A suffered from urinary retention more frequently between 1 and 6 months (p = 0.035) compared with group B and did not experience any improvement between 6 months and 1 year (p = 0.018). Overall detection of severe bladder/rectal/sexual dysfunctions was significantly different between the two groups, and 56 patients of group A (86.2%) reported a significantly higher rate of severe neurologic pelvic dysfunctions vs. 1 patient (1.6%) of group B (p < 0.001). Our technique appears to be feasible and offers good results in terms of reduced bladder morbidity and apparently higher satisfaction than the classical technique. Considering that this kind of surgery requires uncommon surgical skills and anatomical knowledge, we believe that it should be performed only in selected reference centers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Anatomy of Denonvilliers' fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon.

            The development and anatomy of Denonvilliers' fascia have been controversial for many years and confusion exists about its operative appearance. Better appreciation of this poorly understood anatomy, and its significance for impotence after rectal dissection, may lead to further functional improvements in pelvic surgery. A literature review of the embryology and anatomy of Denonvilliers' fascia and impotence after pelvic rectal surgery was undertaken. Denonvilliers' fascia has no macroscopically discernible layers. The so-called posterior layer refers to the fascia propria of the rectum. The incidence of erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction after rectal excision is high in older patients, and when performed for rectal cancer. There is no consensus about the relationship of Denonvilliers' fascia to the plane of anterior dissection for rectal cancer. Colorectal surgeons should focus on the important anatomy between the rectum and the prostate to improve functional outcomes after rectal excision. A classification of the available anterior dissection planes is proposed. Surgeons should be encouraged to document the plane used as well as outcome in terms of sexual function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair.

              Using the descriptions of Uhlenhuth, and Milley and Nichols, we have been able to identify a sheet of strong connective-type tissue between the rectum and vagina. This layer has been named the rectovaginal septum, referred to, by some, as the rectovaginal fascia. As it is considered to be analogous to the rectovesical septum in men, first described by Denovilliers, some refer to it as Denonvilliers' fascia in the female. This layer is immediately beneath the vaginal mucosa and clearly is what many would consider part of the vaginal wall. Its principal attachments are peripheral--it merges superiorly with the cardinal/uterosacral complex, fuses laterally with the fascia over the levator muscle, and merges distally into the perineal body. Histologically, it contains collagen that is quite dense in places, some strands of smooth muscle, and a very dense network of heavy elastin fibers. It is this layer that acts as a supporting structure for the perineal body and prevents the rectum from bulging into the vagina. Rectoceles represent a defect in this layer that allows the rectum to bulge inward. The defects are usually isolated breaks that can be repaired directly with excellent and predictable results.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                13 May 2020
                May 2020
                : 9
                : 5
                : 1460
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gynecology, Medical University Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria; drstoqn.kostov@ 123456gmail.com (S.K.); st_slavchev@ 123456abv.bg (S.S.)
                [2 ]Department of General and Clinical pathology, Forensic Medicine and Deontology, Medical University Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria; dzhenkov@ 123456mail.bg
                [3 ]University hospital SBALAG “Maichin Dom”, Medical University Sofia, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria; dr.dimitur.mitev@ 123456gmail.com
                [4 ]Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: angel.jordanov@ 123456gmail.com ; Tel.: +359-98-8767-1520
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-3095
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-6159
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7719-382X
                Article
                jcm-09-01460
                10.3390/jcm9051460
                7291144
                32414119
                314aa8a7-d20b-4537-9d67-0aebd4c0b384
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 April 2020
                : 09 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                avascular spaces,surgery,applications in obstetrics,applications in gynecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article