5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Phylogeny and floral hosts of a predominantly pollen generalist group of mason bees (Megachilidae: Osmiini) : Phylogeny and floral hosts ofOsmia

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Maximum Likelihood Approach to Reconstructing Ancestral Character States of Discrete Characters on Phylogenies

          Mark Page (1999)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Specialized bees fail to develop on non-host pollen: do plants chemically protect their pollen?

            Bees require large amounts of pollen for their own reproduction. While several morphological flower traits are known to have evolved to protect plants against excessive pollen harvesting by bees, little is known on how selection to minimize pollen loss acts on the chemical composition of pollen. In this study, we traced the larval development of four solitary bee species, each specialized on a different pollen source, when reared on non-host pollen by transferring unhatched eggs of one species onto the pollen provisions of another species. Pollen diets of Asteraceae and Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae) proved to be inadequate for all bee species tested except those specialized on these plants. Further, pollen of Sinapis (Brassicaceae) and Echium (Boraginaceae) failed to support larval development in one bee species specialized on Campanula (Campanulaceae). Our results strongly suggest that pollen of these four taxonomic groups possess protective properties that hamper digestion and thus challenge the general view of pollen as an easy-to-use protein source for flower visitors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of molecular data on our understanding of bee phylogeny and evolution.

              Our understanding of bee phylogeny has improved over the past fifteen years as a result of new data, primarily nucleotide sequence data, and new methods, primarily model-based methods of phylogeny reconstruction. Phylogenetic studies based on single or, more commonly, multilocus data sets have helped resolve the placement of bees within the superfamily Apoidea; the relationships among the seven families of bees; and the relationships among bee subfamilies, tribes, genera, and species. In addition, molecular phylogenies have played an important role in inferring evolutionary patterns and processes in bees. Phylogenies have provided the comparative framework for understanding the evolution of host-plant associations and pollen specialization, the evolution of social behavior, and the evolution of parasitism. In this paper, we present an overview of significant discoveries in bee phylogeny based primarily on the application of molecular data. We review the phylogenetic hypotheses family-by-family and then describe how the new phylogenetic insights have altered our understanding of bee biology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
                Biol J Linn Soc Lond
                Wiley
                00244066
                January 2014
                January 2014
                October 24 2013
                : 111
                : 1
                : 78-91
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Agricultural Sciences; Applied Entomology; ETH Zurich; Schmelzbergstrasse 9/LFO 8092 Zurich Switzerland
                Article
                10.1111/bij.12186
                3159396d-b8b5-431e-8c1e-75f14a7eea6a
                © 2013

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article