Introduction
The publication of five articles at the end of August 2014 marked the official launch
of the International Journal of STEM Education. At the end of July 2018, the journal
had completed four publication cycle years, that is, publication cycle 1 (PC-1): August
2014 – July 2015, publication cycle 2 (PC-2): August 2015 – July 2016, publication
cycle 3 (PC-3): August 2016 – July 2017, and publication cycle 4 (PC-4): August 2017
– July 2018. Along with the rapid development of STEM education internationally, the
journal has also established itself in the global field. Now is therefore a fitting
time to briefly review and reflect on (1) the journal’s overall performance over the
past four publication cycle years, (2) the journal’s publications during these four
publication cycle years, and (3) the journal’s position in comparison with other journals
in STEM education.
How well has the journal performed over the four publication cycle years?
One critical aspect of an academic journal’s performance is to look at the impact
of the journal as a whole. Although there are different measures that can be used
in a professional field to assess a journal’s impact (e.g., peer evaluation, recognition
within the field, and inclusion by various indexing services), one commonly valued
indicator is the number and type of indexing services that include the journal. After
a journal has obtained an Impact Factor, scholars often want to know its value.
Beginning in early 2018, the International Journal of STEM Education has been selected
and reviewed in the Web of Science’s Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), in addition
to other important professional services including SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and almost
20 other data searching and indexing services. Being accepted into ESCI is a first
step in the evaluation process for obtaining an Impact Factor, which is exclusively
published for journals included in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) or Social
Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) (Testa, 2018). It is certainly a very important step.
Inclusion in ESCI means that the journal has been identified as important to key opinion
leaders, funders, and evaluators worldwide. ESCI allows researchers to discover new
areas of research in evolving disciplines, as well as relevant interdisciplinary scholarly
content across rapidly changing research fields. The journal records are now covered
in the Web of Science, which means that articles are discoverable there with full
citation counts, author information and other enrichments. Given the journal’s short
publication history, this coverage is indeed a marvelous achievement! This achievement
reflects high quality of the articles that authors have contributed in the internationally
oriented field of STEM education during the past four publication cycle years.
What has the journal published during its first four publication cycle years (August
2014 through July 2018)?
A journal’s performance is related closely to its ability to attract and publish high-quality
papers. It can be measured in part by the number of papers published in each cycle
year and how well these publications are received and cited by scholars in the field.
In this editorial, I will focus on the number of items published in the journal’s
first four cycle years.
The International Journal of STEM Education has published a total of 118 items over
the past four publication cycle years, thus averaging 29 items per publication year.
Figure 1 shows the journal’s growth in terms of the number of items published for
each publication cycle year, from August 2014 to July 2018. It is clear that the journal
started to receive and publish many more articles since August 2017 (51 publications
in the fourth cycle), in comparison to its prior three publication cycles from August
2014 to July 2017 (i.e., 24, 21, and 22 in the first, second, and third cycles, respectively).
Fig. 1
Number of publications by publication cycle year
Because the journal publishes several types of articles, Table 1 shows the breakdown
of these 118 publications by type for each publication cycle year.
Table 1
Number (percentage) of publications of each type by publication cycle year
PC-1
PC-2
PC-3
PC-4
TOTAL
Research articles
18 (75%)
15 (71%)
19 (86%)
39 (76%)
91 (77%)
Research reviews
2b (8%)
2 (2%)
Short reports
1 (4%)
3 (14%)
2 (9%)
6 (12%)
12 (10%)
Commentaries
2 (8%)
2 (10%)
1 (5%)
3 (6%)
8 (7%)
Others a
1 (4%)
1 (5%)
3 (6%)
5 (4%)
ainclude editorials, guest editorials, and errata
btwo articles were submitted and published as “research”, but they are “reviews”
Regarding types of publications, seen in Table 1 the journal has shown a consistent
pattern over the four publication years. The journal consists mainly of research articles,
followed by short reports and commentaries. There is a noticeable shortage of research
reviews. Although the relatively short history of STEM education may be one reason
for such a shortage, the journal certainly wants to encourage submission of many more
research reviews.
In addition to the number of publications, we next consider the subject discipline(s)
on which the articles have focused. Specifically, our journal aims to serve as a multidisciplinary
education journal that spans disciplinary boundaries. Thus, we are interested in learning
about publication distributions in terms of their disciplinary focus: individual-discipline
focused versus cross-discipline focused.
Figure 2 shows the percentage distribution of these 118 publications structured by
their subject disciplinary concentration: individual- (light color) vs. cross-discipline
(dark color), for the four publication cycle years. Overall, 36% of the 118 publications
have focused on issues and questions in an individual discipline, and 64% have been
cross-disciplinary. Represented among the former are publications on education in
a wide variety of individual disciplines, including biology, physics (when individual
discipline in science is specified), science (when science is taken as a general discipline),
mathematics, and engineering. For those publications in cross-disciplinary concentrations,
readers can find publications on issues and questions that span across multiple disciplines,
such as science, mathematics, and technology.
Fig. 2
Percentage of publications in single-disciplinary (light color bars) and cross-disciplinary
(dark color bars) concentrations for each publication cycle year
The results suggest that the journal has published more articles on cross-disciplinary
than single-disciplinary issues and questions, and over the four publication cycle
years there has been a generally increasing trend in this regard. These findings confirm
that the journal is fulfilling its aim: to provide multidisciplinary perspectives
needed to complement individual disciplinary-focused journals in STEM education (Li,
2014). Indeed, the journal has served as a platform for STEM educators and researchers
to share their research in individual disciplines at the same place, as opposed to
be published across multiple journals. Even more important, STEM educators and researchers
have shared their research on issues and questions that are cross-disciplinary in
nature. The journal will continue to value and welcome original contributions from
different perspectives that view STEM education, either as a collection of traditionally
defined, individual-disciplinary-based education separately in S.T.E.M., or as an
educational undertaking in inter-connected STEM fields.
How does the International Journal of STEM Education differ from other journals in
STEM education, especially the Journal for STEM Education Research?
The International Journal of STEM Education was established in 2014 as a multidisciplinary,
open-access, peer-reviewed research journal. It complements individual disciplinary-focused
journals in STEM education by “(1) providing an outlet to publish and share research
from various disciplines and methods, (2) increasing access to research findings for
researchers and educators through the journal’s open-access platform, and (3) galvanizing
scientists and educational researchers to further our knowledge about STEM education.”
(Li, 2014, p. 1).
The journal’s nature distinguishes it from many other journals in education research,
including the newly established Journal for STEM Education Research (STEM-ER), which
is also published by Springer (see https://www.springer.com/41979). As noted by Li
(2018), these two journals (i.e., the International Journal of STEM Education and
the STEM-ER) complement each other in the following two main regards. First, the International
Journal of STEM Education is an online open-access journal. Although authors who publish
in this journal need to account for article processing charges (APCs), they also enjoy
broad free accessibility of their published articles. In contrast, STEM-ER is a subscription-based
journal that publishes in both print and electronic formats. Although authors who
publish in STEM-ER do not need to concern about APCs, access to their published articles
is restricted to those who pay to subscribe the journal.
The second difference relates to the aim and scope of these two journals. STEM-ER
is established as an interdisciplinary education research journal. It is designed
to promote research that helps identifying and addressing sets of basic questions
that can not only reflect but also lead the rapid development of integrated STEM education
around the globe (Li, 2018). In contrast, the International Journal of STEM Education
is established as a platform to promote STEM education and research internationally
by serving as a multidisciplinary education journal that spans disciplinary boundaries.
Although interdisciplinary research contributions are preferred, the International
Journal of STEM Education will remain a gathering place where disciplinary education
scholars, who have traditionally been separated, can share both individual-disciplinary-based
and cross-disciplinary educational research.
As summarized and discussed above, the International Journal of STEM Education has
had a great journey over the past four publication cycle years. In many ways, its
development mirrors the rapid development of STEM education research around the globe.
I expect the journal to continue to grow to further support STEM education research
and development. At the same time, I realize that every success of the journal originates
from the great contributions and support from numerous authors, scholars, and readers
around the world. Thank you all for making the journal an important place to share
scholarly information about STEM education and research!
Last but not least, I want to take this opportunity to thank all members of the journal’s
editorial board, and staff members at SpringerOpen, for their dedicated support. It
is a great pleasure to work together with them.