3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Scent chemistry and pollinator attraction in the deceptive trap flowers of Ceropegia dolichophylla

      , , , , , ,
      South African Journal of Botany
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Wake Up and Smell the Roses: The Ecology and Evolution of Floral Scent

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Qualitative and quantitative analyses of flower scent in Silene latifolia.

            The quantitative and qualitative variability in floral scent of 98 specimens of the dioecious species Silene latifolia belonging to 15 European and 19 North American populations was determined. Floral scent was collected from single flowers using dynamic headspace methods, and analysed by Micro-SPE and GC-MS methods. The flowers showed a nocturnal rhythm, and scent was emitted only at night. The amount of emitted volatiles varied greatly during the season, from 400 ng/flower/2 min in June to 50 ng/flower/2 min in August and September. The qualitative variability in the floral scent was high and different chemotypes, characterised by specific scent compounds, were found. Female and male flowers emitted the same type and amount of volatiles. The differences in floral scent composition between European and North American populations were small. Typical compounds were isoprenoids like lilac aldehyde isomers, or trans-beta-ocimene, and benzenoids like benzaldehyde, phenyl acetaldehyde, or veratrole. Some of these compounds are known to attract nocturnal Lepidoptera species. The high qualitative variability is discussed in relation to the pollination biology of S. latifolia, and the results are compared with other studies investigating intraspecific variability of flower scent.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nursery pollination by a moth in Silene latifolia: the role of odours in eliciting antennal and behavioural responses.

              Since the 1970s it has been known that the nursery pollinator Hadena bicruris is attracted to the flowers of its most important host plant, Silene latifolia, by their scent. Here we identified important compounds for attraction of this noctuid moth. Gas chromatographic and electroantennographic methods were used to detect compounds eliciting signals in the antennae of the moth. Electrophysiologically active compounds were tested in wind-tunnel bioassays to foraging naïve moths, and the attractivity of these compounds was compared with that to the natural scent of whole S. latifolia flowers. The antennae of moths detected substances of several classes. Phenylacetaldehyde elicited the strongest signals in the antennae, but lilac aldehydes were the most attractive compounds in wind-tunnel bioassays and attracted 90% of the moths tested, as did the scent of single flowers. Our results show that the most common and abundant floral scent compounds in S. latifolia, lilac aldehydes, attracted most of the moths tested, indicating a specific adaptation of H. bicruris to its host plant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                South African Journal of Botany
                South African Journal of Botany
                Elsevier BV
                02546299
                October 2010
                October 2010
                : 76
                : 4
                : 762-769
                Article
                10.1016/j.sajb.2010.07.022
                3173cd47-7046-4f12-a4b8-f3ebbf8fe074
                © 2010

                http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article