26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Responsibility-Sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many argue that effective learning requires students to take a substantial share of responsibility for their academic development, complementing the responsibilities taken by their educators. Yet this notion of responsibility-sharing receives minimal discussion in the context of assessment feedback, where responsibility for enhancing learning is often framed as lying principally with educators. Developing discussion on this issue is critical: many barriers can prevent students from engaging meaningfully with feedback, but neither educators nor students are fully empowered to remove these barriers without collaboration. In this discussion paper we argue that a culture of responsibility-sharing in the giving and receiving of feedback is essential, both for ensuring that feedback genuinely benefits students by virtue of their skilled and proactive engagement, and also for ensuring the sustainability of educators' effective feedback practices. We propose some assumptions that should underpin such a culture, and we consider the practicalities of engendering this cultural shift within modern higher education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Power of Feedback

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Differing perceptions in the feedback process

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                06 September 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 1519
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Aston University Birmingham, United Kingdom
                [2] 2Department of Higher Education, University of Surrey Guildford, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Dilly Fung, University College London, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Niamh Stack, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Louise Bunce, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Robert A. Nash r.nash1@ 123456aston.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519
                5592371
                28932202
                318e839d-7e5d-4a48-b94e-e66555f6aa86
                Copyright © 2017 Nash and Winstone.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 21 June 2017
                : 22 August 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 44, Pages: 9, Words: 7898
                Funding
                Funded by: Higher Education Academy 10.13039/501100000661
                Award ID: GEN1024
                Categories
                Psychology
                Conceptual Analysis

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                feedback,assessment,student engagement,teaching excellence,culture,sustainability

                Comments

                Comment on this article