7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      Are you tired of sifting through news that doesn't interest you?
      Personalize your Karger newsletter today and get only the news that matters to you!

      Sign up

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Diagnostic A-Scan of Choroidal Melanoma: Automated Quantification of Parameters

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim: To develop an automated algorithm to quantify ultrasonographic A-scan parameters of choroidal melanoma. Methods: The study included 100 consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of choroidal melanoma. Ultrasonographic A-scans (8 MHz, 1,550 m/s, tissue sensitivity = 67 dB) were performed by standard techniques. We created and then utilized a MATLAB® script to generate four quantifiable A-scan parameters: (1) tumor height (mm), (2) the number of internal reflectivity peaks (numerical value), (3) median internal reflectivity (%), and (4) angle κ (°). Results: There were small (≤2.5 mm, n = 32), medium (2.6–10.0 mm, n = 53), and large (> 10.0 mm, n = 14) tumors. The mean number of internal reflectivity peaks counted between the two tumor boundary spikes (surface and base) was 10.0 (σ = 8.7, range 1–37). The median value of the internal reflectivity peaks for all cases varied from 19.8 to 99.5 (mean = 68.3, σ = 20.5). A statistically significant correlation was observed between the tumor height categories and each of the three A-scan parameters: the number of internal reflectivity peaks (ρ = 0.90, p < 0.01), median internal reflectivity (ρ = –0.63, p < 0.01), and a positive angle κ (ρ = –0.32, p = 0.03). Conclusions: An automated algorithm can provide quantifiable A-scan parameters for choroidal melanoma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ultrasonics in ocular diagnosis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Computerized Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization of Ocular Tumors

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Noninvasive in vivo detection of prognostic indicators for high-risk uveal melanoma: ultrasound parameter imaging.

              Primary malignant melanoma of the choroid and ciliary body has traditionally been treated without histologic staging, using purely clinical indicators. The presence of extravascular matrix patterns (EMP) in histologic sections of uveal melanoma has been shown to be an independent indicator of metastatic risk. These patterns are of a dimension and physical composition that are likely to be detected with ultrasound backscatter analysis. Our aim was to determine whether ultrasound parameter imaging could detect the presence of EMP at a diagnostically significant level for treatment staging and for planning investigational studies of therapeutic modalities. Prospective, masked ultrasound-pathologic correlative study. One hundred seventeen patients diagnosed with previously untreated choroidal melanoma were scanned within 2 weeks before enucleation. Tumors were evaluated histologically and divided into high-risk and low-risk groups on the basis of the presence of 2% or more histologic cross-sectional area composed of EMP patterns. Digital ultrasound data were processed to generate parameter images representing the size and concentration of ultrasound scatterers. Histologic and ultrasound images and data were correlated, and linear and nonlinear statistical methods were used to create multivariate models for noninvasive differentiation of high-risk and low-risk tumors. Presence or absence of high-risk EMP and associated ultrasound parameter classification models. Of the 117 tumors, 69 were classified as low risk, and 48 were classified as high-risk with histologic analysis. A classification that used ultrasound parameter image features with linear discriminant analysis could correctly identify 79.5% of cases retrospectively and 75.2% of cases by use of cross-validation, an estimate of prospective classification ability. By use of a more powerful classification technique (support vector machine), 93.1% of cases were correctly classified retrospectively. With a cross-validation procedure, 80.10% of cases were correctly classified. Ultrasound can be used noninvasively to classify tumors into high-risk and low-risk groups by detecting the presence of EMP patterns. By the use of previous studies that compared the histologic presence of EMP patterns with patient survival, estimates of hazard rates associated with ultrasound risk groups can be made. The noninvasive ultrasound classification is potentially useful as a prognostic variable and as a tool for stratification of patient populations for tumor treatment evaluation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                OOP
                OOP
                10.1159/issn.2296-4657
                Ocular Oncology and Pathology
                S. Karger AG
                2296-4681
                2296-4657
                2019
                August 2019
                15 March 2019
                : 5
                : 5
                : 350-357
                Affiliations
                Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
                Author notes
                *Arun D. Singh, MD, Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk i32, Cleveland, OH 44195 (USA), E-Mail singha@ccf.org
                Article
                496345 Ocul Oncol Pathol 2019;5:350–357
                10.1159/000496345
                6751448
                31559246
                31f03e6f-334d-4d1b-a842-891b62072bf4
                © 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 04 September 2018
                : 16 December 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Research Article

                Vision sciences,Ophthalmology & Optometry,Pathology
                Ultrasonography,Choroidal tumors,Melanoma,Diagnostic A-scan

                Comments

                Comment on this article