8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      How generalizable are the effects of smoking prevention programs? Refusal skills training and parent messages in a teacher-administered program

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d5364136e99">This study investigated both substantive and methodological issues associated with school-based smoking prevention programs. Substantive issues included the efficacy of a refusal skills training curriculum and of parent messages mailed to students' homes. Methodological issues included the effects of assigning classrooms versus entire schools to experimental conditions and determination of the effects of attrition on internal and external validity. Results revealed differential impact for different subgroups of adolescents. The refusal skills program produced lower rates of smoking than the control condition for students who were smokers at the pretreatment assessment but may have produced detrimental effects among males who were nonsmokers at pretest. The provision of parent messages did not affect outcome. Method of assignment (schools versus classrooms) failed to produce significant effects, and attrition did not affect internal validity. However, the above differential findings, as well as the impact of attrition on external validity, raise questions concerning the generalizability of smoking prevention programs. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Behavioral Medicine
          J Behav Med
          Springer Nature
          0160-7715
          1573-3521
          December 1987
          December 1987
          : 10
          : 6
          : 613-628
          Article
          10.1007/BF00846658
          3437450
          3247c74c-3505-47ef-9908-aec3acd2fdd4
          © 1987
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article