36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Speech production long avoided electrophysiological experiments due to the suspicion that potential artifacts caused by muscle activity of overt speech may lead to a bad signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. Therefore, researchers have sought to assess speech production by using indirect speech production tasks, such as tacit or implicit naming, delayed naming, or meta-linguistic tasks, such as phoneme-monitoring. Covert speech may, however, involve different processes than overt speech production. Recently, overt speech has been investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). As the number of papers published is rising steadily, this clearly indicates the increasing interest and demand for overt speech research within the field of cognitive neuroscience of language. Our main goal here is to review all currently available results of overt speech production involving EEG measurements, such as picture naming, Stroop naming, and reading aloud. We conclude that overt speech production can be successfully studied using electrophysiological measures, for instance, event-related brain potentials (ERPs). We will discuss possible relevant components in the ERP waveform of speech production and aim to address the issue of how to interpret the results of ERP research using overt speech, and whether the ERP components in language production are comparable to results from other fields.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Canonical correlation analysis applied to remove muscle artifacts from the electroencephalogram.

          The electroencephalogram (EEG) is often contaminated by muscle artifacts. In this paper, a new method for muscle artifact removal in EEG is presented, based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) as a blind source separation (BSS) technique. This method is demonstrated on a synthetic data set. The method outperformed a low-pass filter with different cutoff frequencies and an independent component analysis (ICA)-based technique for muscle artifact removal. In addition, the method is applied on a real ictal EEG recording contaminated with muscle artifacts. The proposed method removed successfully the muscle artifact without altering the recorded underlying ictal activity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect.

            The electrophysiological correlates of the Stroop color-word interference effect were studied in eight healthy subjects using high-density Event-Related Potentials (ERPs). Three response modalities were compared: Overt Verbal, Covert Verbal, and Manual. Both Overt Verbal and Manual versions of the Stroop yielded robust Stroop color-word interference as indexed by longer RT for incongruent than congruent color words. The Incongruent vs Congruent ERP difference wave presented two effects. A first effect was a medial dorsal negativity between 350-500 ms post-stimulus (peak at 410 ms). This effect had a significantly different scalp distribution in the Verbal and Manual Stroop versions, with an anterior-medial focus for overt or covert speech, and a broader medial-dorsal distribution for the manual task. Dipole source analysis suggested two independent generators in anterior cingulate cortex. Later on in time, a prolonged positivity developed between 500-800 ms post-stimulus over left superior temporo-parietal scalp. This effect was present for all the three response modalities. A possible interpretation of these results is that Stroop color-word interference first activates anterior cingulate cortex (350-500 ms post-stimulus), followed by activation of the left temporo-parietal cortex, possibly related to the need of additional processing of word meaning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area.

              Words, grammar, and phonology are linguistically distinct, yet their neural substrates are difficult to distinguish in macroscopic brain regions. We investigated whether they can be separated in time and space at the circuit level using intracranial electrophysiology (ICE), namely by recording local field potentials from populations of neurons using electrodes implanted in language-related brain regions while people read words verbatim or grammatically inflected them (present/past or singular/plural). Neighboring probes within Broca's area revealed distinct neuronal activity for lexical (approximately 200 milliseconds), grammatical (approximately 320 milliseconds), and phonological (approximately 450 milliseconds) processing, identically for nouns and verbs, in a region activated in the same patients and task in functional magnetic resonance imaging. This suggests that a linguistic processing sequence predicted on computational grounds is implemented in the brain in fine-grained spatiotemporally patterned activity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychology
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1664-1078
                09 June 2011
                01 September 2011
                2011
                : 2
                : 208
                Affiliations
                [1] 1simplePsychology, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition Leiden, Netherlands
                [2] 2simpleLanguage and Cognition, Max Planck Institute of Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, Netherlands
                [3] 3simpleThe Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences Wassenaar, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Kristof Strijkers, University of Barcelona, Spain

                Reviewed by: Evelina Fedorenko, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA; Els Severens, Ghent University, Belgium

                *Correspondence: Lesya Y. Ganushchak, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Postbus 310, NL 6500 AH, Nijmegen, Netherlands. e-mail: lganushchak@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Language Sciences, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00208
                3164111
                21909333
                32491ead-3079-443b-900c-765da1765b8c
                Copyright © 2011 Ganushchak, Christoffels and Schiller.

                This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.

                History
                : 14 March 2011
                : 13 August 2011
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 63, Pages: 6, Words: 6326
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                speech production,overt speech,review,erp
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                speech production, overt speech, review, erp

                Comments

                Comment on this article