55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiclass classification of FDG PET scans for the distinction between Parkinson's disease and atypical parkinsonian syndromes ☆☆

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most available pattern recognition methods in neuroimaging address binary classification problems. Here, we used relevance vector machine (RVM) in combination with booststrap resampling (‘bagging’) for non-hierarchical multiclass classification. The method was tested on 120 cerebral 18fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scans performed in patients who exhibited parkinsonian clinical features for 3.5 years on average but that were outside the prevailing perception for Parkinson's disease (PD). A radiological diagnosis of PD was suggested for 30 patients at the time of PET imaging. However, at follow-up several years after PET imaging, 42 of them finally received a clinical diagnosis of PD. The remaining 78 APS patients were diagnosed with multiple system atrophy (MSA, N = 31), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP, N = 26) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS, N = 21), respectively. With respect to this standard of truth, classification sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for PD were 93% 83% 75% and 96%, respectively using binary RVM (PD vs. APS) and 90%, 87%, 79% and 94%, respectively, using multiclass RVM (PD vs. MSA vs. PSP vs. CBS). Multiclass RVM achieved 45%, 55% and 62% classification accuracy for, MSA, PSP and CBS, respectively. Finally, a majority confidence ratio was computed for each scan on the basis of class pairs that were the most frequently assigned by RVM. Altogether, the results suggest that automatic multiclass RVM classification of FDG PET scans achieves adequate performance for the early differentiation between PD and APS on the basis of cerebral FDG uptake patterns when the clinical diagnosis is felt uncertain. This approach cannot be recommended yet as an aid for distinction between the three APS classes under consideration.

          Highlights

          • Multiclass classification is one of the challenges of computer-aided diagnosis.

          • This was addressed here using relevance vector machine and bootstrap aggregation.

          • Performance was tested on FDG-PET scans from 120 parkinsonian patients.

          • Four diagnostic classes under consideration as defined on average 3.5 years after PET.

          • Confusion matrices, majority confidence ratio and discriminant maps were computed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The accuracy of diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes in a specialist movement disorder service.

          We have reviewed the clinical and pathological diagnoses of 143 cases of parkinsonism seen by neurologists associated with the movement disorders service at The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in London who came to neuropathological examination at the United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Research Centre, over a 10-year period between 1990 and the end of 1999. Seventy-three (47 male, 26 female) cases were diagnosed as having idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) and 70 (42 male, 28 female) as having another parkinsonian syndrome. The positive predictive value of the clinical diagnosis for the whole group was 85.3%, with 122 cases correctly clinically diagnosed. The positive predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of IPD was extremely high, at 98.6% (72 out of 73), while for the other parkinsonian syndromes it was 71.4% (50 out of 70). The positive predictive values of a clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) were 85.7 (30 out of 35) and 80% (16 out of 20), respectively. The sensitivity for IPD was 91.1%, due to seven false-negative cases, with 72 of the 79 pathologically established cases being diagnosed in life. For MSA, the sensitivity was 88.2% (30 out of 34), and for PSP it was 84.2% (16 out of 19). The diagnostic accuracy for IPD, MSA and PSP was higher than most previous prospective clinicopathological series and studies using the retrospective application of clinical diagnostic criteria. The seven false-negative cases of IPD suggest a broader clinical picture of disease than previously thought acceptable. This study implies that neurologists with particular expertise in the field of movement disorders may be using a method of pattern recognition for diagnosis which goes beyond that inherent in any formal set of diagnostic criteria.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson's disease: a clinicopathologic study.

            Many authorities have drawn attention to the difficulties in clinically distinguishing Parkinson's disease (PD) from other parkinsonian syndromes. We assessed the clinical features of 100 patients diagnosed prospectively by a group of consultant neurologists as having idiopathic PD according to their pathologic findings. Seventy-six percent of these cases were confirmed to have PD. By using selected criteria (asymmetrical onset, no atypical features, and no possible etiology for another parkinsonian syndrome) the proportion of true PD cases identified was increased to 93%, but 32% of pathologically confirmed cases were rejected on this basis. These observations suggest that studies based on consultant diagnosis of PD, using standard diagnostic criteria, will include cases other than PD, thus distorting results from clinical trials and epidemiologic studies. The strict use of additional criteria can reduce misdiagnosis but at the cost of excluding genuine PD cases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sparse multinomial logistic regression: fast algorithms and generalization bounds.

              Recently developed methods for learning sparse classifiers are among the state-of-the-art in supervised learning. These methods learn classifiers that incorporate weighted sums of basis functions with sparsity-promoting priors encouraging the weight estimates to be either significantly large or exactly zero. From a learning-theoretic perspective, these methods control the capacity of the learned classifier by minimizing the number of basis functions used, resulting in better generalization. This paper presents three contributions related to learning sparse classifiers. First, we introduce a true multiclass formulation based on multinomial logistic regression. Second, by combining a bound optimization approach with a component-wise update procedure, we derive fast exact algorithms for learning sparse multiclass classifiers that scale favorably in both the number of training samples and the feature dimensionality, making them applicable even to large data sets in high-dimensional feature spaces. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first algorithms to perform exact multinomial logistic regression with a sparsity-promoting prior. Third, we show how nontrivial generalization bounds can be derived for our classifier in the binary case. Experimental results on standard benchmark data sets attest to the accuracy, sparsity, and efficiency of the proposed methods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuroimage (Amst)
                Neuroimage (Amst)
                NeuroImage : Clinical
                Elsevier
                2213-1582
                14 June 2013
                14 June 2013
                2013
                : 2
                : 883-893
                Affiliations
                [a ]Cyclotron Research Centre, Sart Tilman B30, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
                [b ]Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Sart Tilman B28, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
                [c ]Department of Neurology, University Hospital Centre, Sart Tilman B35, 4000 Liège, Belgium
                [d ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Centre, Sart Tilman B35, 4000 Liège, Belgium
                [e ]Department of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Peltzer-La Tourelle, 4800 Verviers, Belgium
                [f ]Université Lille Nord de France, 59000 Lille, France
                [g ]UDSL (Université Droit et Santé de Lille), Lille, France
                [h ]CHU de Lille, France
                [i ]Movement Disorders Unit and EA 2683 MENRT, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: MoVeRe Group, Cyclotron Research Centre, University of Liège, Sart Tilman B30, 4000 Liège, Belgium. Tel.: + 32 4 366 23 16; fax: + 32 4 366 29 46. ggarraux@ 123456ulg.ac.be
                [1]

                Both authors equally contributed to this work.

                Article
                S2213-1582(13)00072-7
                10.1016/j.nicl.2013.06.004
                3778264
                24179839
                3270e8cf-2a73-4f70-b487-2c0d2efe018e
                © 2013 The Authors

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 5 August 2012
                : 6 June 2013
                : 7 June 2013
                Categories
                Article

                computer-aided diagnosis,data mining,pattern recognition,boostrap resampling,bagging,error-correcting output code,multiclass classification,relevance vector machine,fdg pet,parkinson's disease,multiple system atrophy,progressive supranuclear palsy,corticobasal syndrome

                Comments

                Comment on this article