0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The politics of continuity and collusion in Zanzibar: political reconciliation and the establishment of the Government of National Unity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The popularity of unity governments to settle both internal political divisions and outright conflict has grown in the last 20 years. However, more often than not unity governments fail to mitigate the political dynamics baked into the political economies and suffer from being insufficiently anchored in local society. The Government of National Unity (GNU) in Zanzibar, formed in 2010 as the culmination of the ‘ maridhiano’ political reconciliation process and following numerous attempts at reconciliation led to initial successes, is a case in point. Zanzibar's GNU turned out to be ‘position’ rather than ‘power’ sharing, constitutionalised through a hybrid format of the politics of continuity and collusion. As such the position sharing system broke down when voters in the 2015 election sought neither continuity nor collusion, but transformational change of governance. This was in turn blocked by veto actors in favour of continuity, resulting in the collapse and discontinuation of the GNU in Zanzibar.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Power-sharing in comparative perspective: the dynamics of ‘unity government’ in Kenya and Zimbabwe

          This paper draws on the recent experience of Kenya and Zimbabwe to demonstrate how power-sharing has played out in Africa. Although the two cases share some superficial similarities, variation in the strength and disposition of key veto players generated radically different contexts that shaped the feasibility and impact of unity government. Explaining the number and attitude of veto players requires a comparative analysis of the evolution of civil–military and intra-elite relations. In Zimbabwe, the exclusionary use of violence and rhetoric, together with the militarisation of politics, created far greater barriers to genuine power-sharing, resulting in the politics of continuity . These veto players were less significant in the Kenyan case, giving rise to a more cohesive outcome in the form of the politics of collusion . However, we find that neither mode of power-sharing creates the conditions for effective reform, which leads to a more general conclusion: unity government serves to postpone conflict, rather than to resolve it.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Power Sharing and Inclusive Politics in Africa's Uncertain Democracies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The internal dynamics of power-sharing in Africa

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Journal of Modern African Studies
                J. Mod. Afr. Stud.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0022-278X
                1469-7777
                June 2018
                May 11 2018
                June 2018
                : 56
                : 2
                : 245-267
                Article
                10.1017/S0022278X18000162
                328fc837-b4e5-4ebe-afe4-a4391e90a194
                © 2018

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article