12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High-Intensity Interval Training for Early Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction - A Promising Approach for Rats, but what about Human Beings?

      editorial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), in particularly, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), kill or debilitate a large number of patients in the world. Despite the fact that not all patients develop ventricular dysfunction after the event, there is still a high prevalence of post-AMI heart failure, 1,2 which is considered a public health problem. Although the management of post-ACS is based on a wide range of drugs, usually associated with the revascularization procedure, different non-pharmacological strategies have been shown useful. In this regard, physical exercise is indicated, 3 including cardiac rehabilitation programs that usually combine aerobic and resistance training with stretching exercises. Nevertheless, there is no single recipe for prescribing exercise after an acute coronary event. In my opinion, cardiologists should formally prescribe physical exercise in addition to cardiovascular drugs, considering aspects such as dosage, intervals, intensity and potential side effects. With respect to physical training, a vast of different exercise modalities have emerged and applied in health. Pilates, Tai Chi Chuan, functional training, crossfit, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) among others have spread across gyms and physical centers over the country and have been practiced primarily by apparently healthy individuals. As time passed, animal experiments and clinical studies on cardiovascular disease patients have been conducted. 4-7 HIIT was first proposed to Japanese Olympic skaters by Izumi Tabata. Today, HIIT consists in sessions of one to four-minute of high-intensity submaximal load alternating with low-to-moderate intensity exercises. Randomized clinical trials involving small samples have suggested a superiority of the method in increasing peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) as compared with conventional continuous training. Due to its peculiarities and results, HIIT has boomed all over the world; however, international literature showing the impact of the method in ischemic heart disease patients, particularly in post-AMI patients is still lacking. 4,8,9 In this journal issue, Winter et al. 10 report information on the effects of HIIT on functional capacity and ventricular function in 29 Wistar rats after AMI. On day 21 after the event, the animals were randomized to control group (n = 10), or to undergo continuous training (n = 9) or HIIT (n = 10). All animals had ejection fraction equal to or greater than 50%, i.e., without ventricular dysfunction. An important finding was that the authors did not find within- or between group differences in echocardiographic findings before and after training in the animals allocated to continuous training or to HIIT. The authors suggest that both methods can increase functional capacity without altering ventricular function (remodeling). Based on this, one may ask the following question: can patients at early stage after AMI, without ventricular dysfunction, undergo this type of physical training? In a classical study by Wisloff et al., 5 the authors evaluated three groups of elderly patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), who were clinically stable and had had a myocardial infarction more than one year before the study. Patients were randomized to control, moderate continuous training (MCT) or HIIT group. 5 Individuals assigned to HIIT showed improved peak VO2, left ventricular remodeling and reduced natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels as compared with MCT. Also, a meta-analysis involving 160 patients showed that interval training (regardless of its intensity) increased peak VO2 in HFrEF patients. 11 Similarly, in a meta-analysis including 230 patients, Elliott et al. 12 reported that interval training seems to increase peak VO2 in patients with stable coronary artery disease. 12 In the last years, different strategies that can be included in early post-acute rehabilitation programs have emerged, such as Tai Chi Chuan. 13 In any case, all interventions that may improve patients’ recovery and functional capacity, and whenever possible, increase patients’ survival should be used. With respect to the applicability of HIIT in the management of early post-AMI patients, it may be speculated that the method is efficient in improving peak VO2, an important prognostic marker. In fact, in the world of coronary stents and since post-AMI myocardial function is preserved in many patients, HIIT may be an attractive training strategy for some patients. On the other hand, the body of scientific knowledge is not sufficiently consistent to definitely recommend HIIT as a training modality for early post-AMI patients. Anyway Winter et al., 10 in their investigation on laboratory animals, take an important step towards an effective alternative for cardiac rehabilitation programs in this group of patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training within cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

          Background Aerobic capacity has been shown to be inversely proportionate to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and there is growing evidence that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) appears to be more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in improving cardiorespiratory fitness within the cardiac population. Previously published systematic reviews in cardiovascular disease have neither investigated the effect that the number of weeks of intervention has on cardiorespiratory fitness changes, nor have adverse events been collated. Objective We aimed to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) within the cardiac population that investigated cardiorespiratory fitness changes resulting from HIIT versus MICT and to collate adverse events. Methods A critical narrative synthesis and meta-analysis was conducted after systematically searching relevant databases up to July 2017. We searched for RCTs that compared cardiorespiratory fitness changes resulting from HIIT versus MICT interventions within the cardiac population. Results Seventeen studies, involving 953 participants (465 for HIIT and 488 for MICT) were included in the analysis. HIIT was significantly superior to MICT in improving cardiorespiratory fitness overall (SMD 0.34 mL/kg/min; 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.2–0.48]; p 6-week duration. Programs of 7–12 weeks’ duration resulted in the largest improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness for patients with coronary artery disease. HIIT appears to be as safe as MICT for CR participants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interval training versus continuous exercise in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

            High aerobic capacity is inversely related to cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Recent studies suggest greater improvements in aerobic capacity with high-intensity interval training (interval) compared to moderate-intensity continuous aerobic exercise (continuous). Therefore we perform a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of INTERVAL versus CONTINUOUS in aerobic capacity, amongst patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and preserved ejection fraction
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions.

              It is unknown if vigorous to maximal aerobic interval training (INT) is more effective than traditionally prescribed moderate-intensity continuous aerobic training (MCT) for improving peak oxygen uptake (Vo2) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science were searched using the following keywords: "heart failure," high-intensity interval exercise," "high-intensity interval training," "aerobic interval training," and "high-intensity aerobic interval training." Seven randomized trials were identified comparing the effects of INT and MCT on peak Vo2, 5 of which measured the LVEF at rest. The trials included clinically stable patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with impaired left ventricular systolic function (mean LVEF 32%) who were relatively young (mean age 61 years) and predominantly men (82%). Weighted mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model. INT led to significantly higher increases in peak Vo2 compared with MCT (INT vs MCT, weighted mean difference 2.14 ml O2/kg/min, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 3.63). Comparison of the effects of INT and MCT on the LVEF at rest was inconclusive (INT vs MCT, weighted mean difference 3.29%, 95% confidence interval -0.7% to 7.28%). In conclusion, in clinically stable patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, INT is more effective than MCT for improving peak Vo2 but not the LVEF at rest. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arq Bras Cardiol
                Arq. Bras. Cardiol
                abc
                Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
                Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
                0066-782X
                1678-4170
                April 2018
                April 2018
                : 110
                : 4
                : 381-382
                Affiliations
                [1]Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil
                Author notes
                Mailing Address: Ricardo Stein, Serviço de Fisiatria, Térreo - Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350. Postal Code 90035-903, Porto Alegre, RS - Brazil. E-mail: rstein@ 123456cardiol.br
                Article
                10.5935/abc.20180068
                5941963
                329ce342-2243-458f-be04-157983d419f1

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Short Editorial

                acute coronary syndrome,cardiac rehabilitation,exercise

                Comments

                Comment on this article