13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Old age and forgoing treatment: a nationwide mortality follow-back study in the Netherlands.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ageing of the population raises the need to study forgoing treatment decisions among older people.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study.

          While the adoption of practice guidelines is standardizing many aspects of patient care, ethical dilemmas are occurring because of forgoing life-sustaining therapies in intensive care and are dealt with in diverse ways between different countries and cultures. To determine the frequency and types of actual end-of-life practices in European intensive care units (ICUs) and to analyze the similarities and differences. A prospective, observational study of European ICUs. Consecutive patients who died or had any limitation of therapy. Prospectively defined end-of-life practices in 37 ICUs in 17 European countries were studied from January 1, 1999, to June 30, 2000. Comparison and analysis of the frequencies and patterns of end-of-life care by geographic regions and different patients and professionals. Of 31 417 patients admitted to ICUs, 4248 patients (13.5%) died or had a limitation of life-sustaining therapy. Of these, 3086 patients (72.6%) had limitations of treatments (10% of admissions). Substantial intercountry variability was found in the limitations and the manner of dying: unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 20% (range, 5%-48%), brain death in 8% (range, 0%-15%), withholding therapy in 38% (range, 16%-70%), withdrawing therapy in 33% (range, 5%-69%), and active shortening of the dying process in 2% (range, 0%-19%). Shortening of the dying process was reported in 7 countries. Doses of opioids and benzodiazepines reported for shortening of the dying process were in the same range as those used for symptom relief in previous studies. Limitation of therapy vs continuation of life-sustaining therapy was associated with patient age, acute and chronic diagnoses, number of days in ICU, region, and religion (P<.001). The limiting of life-sustaining treatment in European ICUs is common and variable. Limitations were associated with patient age, diagnoses, ICU stay, and geographic and religious factors. Although shortening of the dying process is rare, clarity between withdrawing therapies and shortening of the dying process and between therapies intended to relieve pain and suffering and those intended to shorten the dying process may be lacking.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trends in end-of-life practices before and after the enactment of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2010: a repeated cross-sectional survey.

            In 2002, the euthanasia act came into effect in the Netherlands, which was followed by a slight decrease in the euthanasia frequency. We assessed frequency and characteristics of euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other end-of-life practices in 2010, and assessed trends since 1990. In 1990, 1995, 2001, 2005, and 2010 we did nationwide studies of a stratified sample from the death registry of Statistics Netherlands, to which all deaths and causes were reported. We mailed questionnaires to physicians attending these deaths (2010: n=8496 deaths). All cases were weighted to adjust for the stratification procedure and for differences in response rates in relation to the age, sex, marital status, region of residence, and cause and place of death. In 2010, of all deaths in the Netherlands, 2·8% (95% CI 2·5-3·2; 475 of 6861) were the result of euthanasia. This rate is higher than the 1·7% (1·5-1·8; 294 of 9965) in 2005, but comparable with those in 2001 and 1995. Distribution of sex, age, and diagnosis was stable between 1990 and 2010. In 2010, 77% (3136 of 4050) of all cases of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide were reported to a review committee (80% [1933 of 2425] in 2005). Ending of life without an explicit patient request in 2010 occurred less often (0·2%; 95% CI 0·1-0·3; 13 of 6861) than in 2005, 2001, 1995, and 1990 (0·8%; 0·6-1·1; 45 of 5197). Continuous deep sedation until death occurred more frequently in 2010 (12·3% [11·6-13·1; 789 of 6861]) than in 2005 (8·2% [7·8-8·6; 521 of 9965]). Of all deaths in 2010, 0·4% (0·3-0·6; 18 of 6861) were the result of the patient's decision to stop eating and drinking to end life; in half of these cases the patient had made a euthanasia request that was not granted. Our study provides insight in consequences of regulating euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide within the broader context of end-of-life practices. In the Netherlands the euthanasia law resulted in a relatively transparent practice. Although translating these results to other countries is not straightforward, they can inform the debate on legalisation of assisted dying in other countries. The Netherlands Organization for Research and Development (ZonMw). Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Advance Care Planning in palliative care: a systematic literature review of the contextual factors influencing its uptake 2008-2012.

              Advance Care Planning is an iterative process of discussion, decision-making and documentation about end-of-life care. Advance Care Planning is highly relevant in palliative care due to intersecting clinical needs. To enhance the implementation of Advance Care Planning, the contextual factors influencing its uptake need to be better understood. To identify the contextual factors influencing the uptake of Advance Care Planning in palliative care as published between January 2008 and December 2012. Databases were systematically searched for studies about Advance Care Planning in palliative care published between January 2008 and December 2012. This yielded 27 eligible studies, which were appraised using National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Quality Appraisal Checklists. Iterative thematic synthesis was used to group results. Factors associated with greater uptake included older age, a college degree, a diagnosis of cancer, greater functional impairment, being white, greater understanding of poor prognosis and receiving or working in specialist palliative care. Barriers included having non-malignant diagnoses, having dependent children, being African American, and uncertainty about Advance Care Planning and its legal status. Individuals' previous illness experiences, preferences and attitudes also influenced their participation. Factors influencing the uptake of Advance Care Planning in palliative care are complex and multifaceted reflecting the diverse and often competing needs of patients, health professionals, legislature and health systems. Large population-based studies of palliative care patients are required to develop the sound theoretical and empirical foundation needed to improve uptake of Advance Care Planning in this setting. © The Author(s) 2014.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Ethics
                Journal of medical ethics
                BMJ
                1473-4257
                0306-6800
                Sep 2015
                : 41
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care research, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
                [2 ] Department of Public Health, ERASMUS MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
                [3 ] Julius Center for Health Sciences, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
                Article
                medethics-2014-102367
                10.1136/medethics-2014-102367
                25896928
                32b25557-f41f-41e0-8948-4b23eee835ed
                History

                Autonomy,Decision-making,Elderly and Terminally Ill,End-of-life,Palliative Care

                Comments

                Comment on this article