214
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fat Grafting to the Forehead/Glabella/Radix Complex and Pyriform Aperture: Aesthetic and Anti-Aging Implications

      research-article
      , MD *† , , , MD
      Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
      Wolters Kluwer Health

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Optimal aesthetic outcomes from rhinoplasty are heavily influenced by structures adjacent to the nose. Although the importance of the chin has been emphasized since the inception of rhinoplasty, little attention has been given to the forehead. The forehead/glabella/radix complex represents a vital triad in rhinoplasty, from which the nasofrontal angle is derived. In the present study, the authors sought to determine whether fat grafting to the forehead/glabella/radix complex and pyriform aperture can favorably impact the nasofrontal and nasolabial angles, respectively.

          Methods:

          The authors reviewed pre- and postoperative images (obtained by an independent professional photographer) of patients who underwent autologous fat grafting to the forehead/glabella/radix region and the pyriform aperture, with or without concurrent rhinoplasty. Nasofrontal and nasolabial angles were measured on lateral images. Mean pre- and postoperative values were calculated and compared. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical analysis.

          Results:

          Twenty-six patients underwent fat grafting alone (FG group; mean follow-up, 3.3 years), and 19 had fat grafting plus rhinoplasty (FG + R group; mean follow-up, 5.2 years). The mean nasofrontal angle in the FG group decreased by 2.0° ( P = 0.005), and the mean nasolabial angle increased by 2.3° ( P = 0.006). The mean nasofrontal angle in the FG + R group decreased by 2.0° ( P = 0.011), and the mean nasolabial angle increased by 6.0° ( P = 0.026).

          Conclusions:

          Autologous fat grafting to the forehead/glabella/radix complex and pyriform aperture is a reliable method to favorably influence the nasofrontal and nasolabial angles, respectively. Such treatment optimizes the interplay between the nose and the adjacent facial features, enhancing overall aesthetics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Aging of the facial skeleton: aesthetic implications and rejuvenation strategies.

          Facial aging is a dynamic process involving the aging of soft-tissue and bony structures. In this study, the authors demonstrate how the facial skeleton changes with age in both male and female subjects and what impact these structural changes may have on overall facial aesthetics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Aesthetic Rhinoplasty

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rhinoplasty with advancing age.

              Rhinoplasty in the aging patient poses a unique set of challenges to the plastic surgeon. Aging patients usually have different expectations and motivations than their younger counterparts; therefore, open communication and frank discussions are paramount to define realistic goals. Anatomically, changes in skin quality, cartilage characteristics, underlying bony framework, and the nasal airways mandate special considerations to optimize the functional and aesthetic results. This review will present a practical approach to the management of the nose in the aging patient.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
                GOX
                Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
                Wolters Kluwer Health
                2169-7574
                August 2015
                27 August 2015
                : 3
                : 8
                : e500
                Affiliations
                From the [* ]Museum Mile Surgery Center, New York, N.Y.; []Split Rock Surgical Associates, Wilton, Conn.; and []the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, N.Y.
                Author notes
                Andrew N. Kornstein, MD, 1050 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10028, E-mail: info@ 123456kornstein.com
                Article
                00003
                10.1097/GOX.0000000000000470
                4560233
                26495213
                32e57041-2a63-4083-ba01-e70d64952151
                Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

                History
                : 4 November 2014
                : 1 July 2015
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article