15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology

      , ,

      Genomics, society, and policy

      Springer Berlin Heidelberg

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Edwin Southern developed a blotting technique for DNA in 1973, thereby creating a staple of molecular biology laboratory procedures still used after several decades. It became a seminal technology for studying the structure of DNA. The story of the creation and dissemination of this technology, which was not patented and was freely distributed throughout the scientific community, stands as a case study in open science. The Southern blot was developed at a time when attitudes about commercial intrusion into health research were beginning to change and the practical value of molecular genetics was becoming apparent to industry. Interest from industry in fundamental molecular biological techniques meant that scientists began to think about commercial uses of their work even in otherwise "basic" research. The unpatented Southern blot is contrasted with later patented technologies, particularly microarray methods, which were created in the same environment by many of the same people, but which followed significant changes to UK policies encouraging commercialization of academic research and a norm shift friendlier to such commercialization within academic molecular biology. Professor Southern's personal experience illuminates how the technologies evolved, and his views provide insight into how scientists' attitudes about commercialization have changed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          bob.cd@duke.edu
          Journal
          Genomics Soc Policy
          Genomics Soc Policy
          Genomics, society, and policy
          Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
          1746-5354
          15 August 2006
          15 August 2006
          December 2006
          : 2
          : 2
          Article
          30
          10.1186/1746-5354-2-2-50
          5424904
          © ESRC Genomics Network 2006
          Categories
          Article
          Custom metadata
          © The Author(s) 2006

          Comments

          Comment on this article