Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

What is the role of consultation-liaison psychiatry in the management of depression in primary care? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

General hospital psychiatry

organization & administration, Referral and Consultation, Psychiatry, Professional Role, Primary Health Care, Humans, Depression, Cooperative Behavior

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      To assess the effectiveness of consultation-liaison services, involving mental health professionals working to advise and support primary care professionals in the management of depression. Studies of consultation-liaison for depression in primary care were identified from a systematic search of electronic databases, augmented by identification of papers from reference lists, published reviews and from hand searching. Data on study quality, intervention characteristics and outcomes were extracted by two reviewers, and outcome data were meta-analyzed. Five studies met the criteria. There was no significant effect of consultation-liaison on antidepressant use (risk ratio 1.23, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.66) or depression outcomes in the short- (standardized mean difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.14) or long-term (standardized mean difference 0.06, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.26). Evidence concerning consultation-liaison for depression in primary care remains limited, but the existing studies do not suggest it is more effective than usual care. Further research is required to explore the mechanisms by which consultation-liaison might be made more effective, including the potential role of consultation-liaison in combination with other models of care, and in other patient populations. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.02.003
      20430227

      Comments

      Comment on this article