74
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Surgical treatment of sacroiliac joint infection

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Sacroiliac joint infection is rare and frequently missed; purpose of this study is to describe the clinical presentations, comorbidities, laboratory and imaging findings, surgical options and outcomes of this rare condition.

          Materials and methods

          We reviewed all cases of surgical treatment of sacroiliac joint infection operated at our institution between January 1994 and December 2011. Twenty-two patients were included: 14 females and 8 males, with mean age of 50 years. The mean follow-up period was 34 months. Twenty-four operations were performed. Coinciding infection was found in 11 cases (50 %). Twelve patients (54.5 %) presented acutely, while ten patients (45.5 %) had chronic infection.

          Results

          Tuberculous infection was diagnosed in 5 cases and nonspecific infection in 13 cases. In four cases, no organism was isolated. Eleven cases were subjected to debridement only, while debridement and arthrodesis was needed in 11 cases. Eight patients had excellent clinical results, five good, three fair and four poor; one patient was lost to follow-up, and one patient died after 2 weeks. The operative technique depended on the course of the infection, bone destruction and general condition of the patient. There was a significant change in C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, while the difference in white blood cell count was nonsignificant.

          Conclusions

          In acute cases, the primary aim should be to save joint integrity by early debridement, depending on joint destruction and general patient condition. When it is chronic, it is not secure only to debride the joint, which should be fused.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sacroiliac joint tuberculosis.

          Infections of the sacroiliac joint are uncommon and the diagnosis is usually delayed. In a retrospective study, 17 patients who had been treated for tuberculosis sacroiliitis between 1994 and 2004 were reviewed. Two patients were excluded due to a short follow-up (less than 2 years). Low back pain and difficulty in walking were the most common presenting features. Two patients presented with a buttock abscess and spondylitis of the lumbar spine was noted in two patients. The Gaenslen's and FABER (flexion, abduction and external rotation) tests were positive in all patients. Radiological changes included loss of cortical margins with erosion of the joints. An open biopsy and curettage was performed in all patients; histology revealed chronic infection and acid-fast bacilli were isolated in nine patients. Antituberculous (TB) medication was administered for 18 months and the follow-up ranged from 3 to 10 years (mean: 5 years). The sacroiliac joint fused spontaneously within 2 years. Although all patients had mild discomfort in the lower back following treatment they had no difficulty in walking. Sacroiliac joint infection must be included in the differential diagnosis of lower back pain and meticulous history and clinical evaluation of the joint are essential.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Acute pyogenic sacroiliitis without predisposing conditions.

            Clinical and imaging findings of patients diagnosed with pyogenic sacroiliitis were retrospectively analyzed. To characterize the clinical and magnetic resonance features of patients with acute pyogenic sacroiliitis without the usually known predisposing conditions and to investigate the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting the early stages of pyogenic sacroiliitis. Pyogenic sacroiliitis is relatively uncommon, and accurate diagnosis is frequently delayed due to lack of awareness by clinicians and nonspecific clinical presentation. There have been few reports that have evaluated the clinical features of acute pyogenic sacroiliitis and investigated the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting pyogenic sacroiliitis in the early stages. The clinical data of 9 patients (6 male, 3 female; average age 27.3 years) diagnosed with acute pyogenic infection of the sacroiliac joint were retrospectively analyzed. Magnetic resonance images as well as computed tomography of the sacroiliac joints were available in all cases. Seven of the patients underwent 99mtechnetium bone scans. All patients showed positive findings on magnetic resonance images, whereas 99mtechnetium bone scans were positive in six of seven patients. Eight patients responded well to treatment with intravenous antibiotic therapy, whereas one patient required debridement of the sacroiliac joint following conservative treatment. Both magnetic resonance imaging and technetium bone scanning are sensitive for localizing occult sites of bone inflammation. Magnetic resonance imaging may provide more useful information than bone scanning by screening for abnormalities in the sacroiliac joint region. With prompt appropriate antibiotic therapy, clinical improvement of patients can be expected.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pyogenic infection of the sacroiliac joint. Case reports and review of the literature.

              Three cases of pyogenic sacroiliitis are described, and the English literature from 1878 to 1990 reviewed, for a total of 166 cases. In 1 patient the source of infection was identified at the site of an intravenous line; 1 patient had 2 risk factors for developing the disease (pregnancy and intravenous drug use); and a third patient had no source of infection and no associated risk factors. The diagnosis of pyogenic sacroiliitis was made in each patient by history, physical examination, and positive skeletal scintigraphy or computed tomography of the sacroiliac joint. The infectious agent causing septic arthritis was identified by fine-needle aspiration of the sacroiliac joint under fluoroscopic guidance. Two of the 3 patients also had an open biopsy of the sacroiliac joint--one to confirm the organism causing septic arthritis, and the other for surgical drainage of the infected sacroiliac joint. Cultures from all 3 patients grew organisms uncommon for this disease, and all were treated for 6 weeks with intravenous antibiotics. In all patients pain diminished after treatment. Pyogenic sacroiliitis is a relatively rare condition (1-2 cases reported/year) that may be clinically difficult to diagnose unless the clinician is familiar with the disease. A prompt diagnosis can prevent significant morbidity and reduce serious complication. Major predisposing factors include intravenous drug use, trauma, or an identifiable focus of infection elsewhere, but 44% of patients have no predisposing or associated factors identified. Most patients present with an acute febrile illness with pain in the buttocks and pain on movement that stresses the affected sacroiliac joint. There is no specific blood test which points to the diagnosis of pyogenic sacroiliitis, although the erythrocyte sedimentation rate may be greater than 100 mm/hr. The diagnostic procedure of choice is bone scan with attention to the early perfusion phase, which usually localizes the affected sacroiliac joint. Unilateral involvement is the rule. In patients whose blood cultures fail to reveal a causative organism, fluoroscopic guided fine-needle aspiration of the sacroiliac joint under general anesthesia may help to identify the organism. If all cultures are negative, open biopsy of the sacroiliac joint may be required. Open biopsy should also be done if sequestration or an abscess is formed, or if the patient fails to respond to antibiotic therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49-364-5851400 , +49-364-58541436 , doctorezzo@hotmail.com
                Journal
                J Orthop Traumatol
                J Orthop Traumatol
                Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
                Springer Milan (Milan )
                1590-9921
                1590-9999
                5 April 2013
                5 April 2013
                June 2013
                : 14
                : 2
                : 121-129
                Affiliations
                Department of Spinal Surgery and Paraplegiology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Robert Koch Allee 9, 99438 Bad Berka, Germany
                Article
                233
                10.1007/s10195-013-0233-3
                3667369
                23558792
                330ae764-90ee-49a8-8fe1-10c2d1f49d96
                © The Author(s) 2013

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 11 August 2012
                : 4 March 2013
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2013

                Orthopedics
                sacroiliac joint infection,pyogenic sacroiliitis,tuberculous sacroiliitis,sacroiliac fusion

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log