21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      At the Crossroads of Stewardship and Technology: Impact of Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) Integrated Electronic Decision Support Software (EDSS) on the Treatment of Patients Infected with Pneumonia

      abstract
      , Pharm.D., MBA 1 , , Pharm.D. 1 , , Pharm.D., M.S. 1 , , Pharm.D. 1 , , Pharm.D. 1 , , Pharm.D., FIDSA 1 , , Pharm.D. 1
      Open Forum Infectious Diseases
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          While many have advocated for the use of EDSS to enhance patient care, EDSS that incorporates PK-PD, the science behind antimicrobial stewardship, has thus far been an unattainable goal. Herein, we describe the use of such a technology and clinicians’ therapy decisions when treating patients with pneumonia.

          Methods

          Data for patients with pneumonia entered into EDSS over a 20-month period that were evaluated included: 1) patient demographics, creatinine clearance, and pneumonia severity score; 2) pneumonia type; 3) pathogen; 4) clinician-selected antimicrobials; 5) EDSS-presented regimens; and 6) clinician-reported outcomes. Clinicians were provided probabilities of attaining PK-PD targets associated with efficacy for both clinician-selected and EDSS-presented regimens. A regimen with a probability of PK-PD target attainment ≥90% was considered PK-PD optimized.

          Results

          Data for 126 cases were available. The median (min, max) age and creatinine clearance were 56.5 (18, >90) years and 72.5 (2.5, 193.3) mL/minute/1.73 m 2, respectively. Pneumonia types included community-acquired (39%), healthcare-associated (30%), ventilator-associated (18%), and hospital-acquired (13%). CURB-65 pneumonia scoring was used in 66% of cases with a median (min, max) score of 3 (0, 5). The most common pathogens were P. A eruginosa (32%), MRSA (15%), and S. pneumoniae (14%). Multi-drug-resistant pathogens comprised 15% of all pathogens. PK-PD optimized regimens were selected in only 65% of cases despite such a regimen being presented in 91% of cases. For those cases in which outcome data were available ( n = 36), 81% of patients were considered improved at 48 hours while only 64% were deemed clinically improved or a success at the final outcome assessment on Days 7–10. Among those cases for whom PK-PD optimized and non-optimized regimens were selected (64 and 36%, respectively), 78 and 62% of patients had successful clinical outcomes on Days 7–10, respectively.

          Conclusion

          Given that patients with pneumonia represent a vulnerable population and that options for therapy can be limited, selection of optimal early therapy is crucial. PK-PD integrated EDSS presents clinicians the opportunity to optimize therapy and improve outcomes for patients with pneumonia.

          Disclosures

          S. M. Bhavnani, ICPD Technologies: Shareholder, stock options. C. M. Rubino, ICPD Technologies: Shareholder, stock options. P. G. Ambrose, ICPD Technologies: Shareholder, stock options.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          Open Forum Infect Dis
          ofid
          Open Forum Infectious Diseases
          Oxford University Press (US )
          2328-8957
          Fall 2017
          04 October 2017
          04 October 2017
          : 4
          : Suppl 1 , ID Week 2017 Abstracts
          : S298
          Affiliations
          [1 ] ICPD , Schenectady, New York
          Author notes

          Session: 77. Use of PK/PD to optimize existing antibiotics and antifungals

          Thursday, October 5, 2017: 12:30 PM

          Article
          ofx163.686
          10.1093/ofid/ofx163.686
          5631923
          3320f45e-54be-4547-99d9-3d140adfefee
          © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 1
          Categories
          Abstracts
          Poster Abstract

          Comments

          Comment on this article