11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dynamical Systems Modeling of Early Childhood Self-Regulation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Self-regulation can be conceptualized in terms of dynamic tension between highly probable reactions (prepotent responses) and use of strategies that can modulate those reactions (executive processes). This study investigated the value of a dynamical systems approach to the study of early childhood self-regulation. Specifically, ordinary differential equations (ODEs) were used to model the interactive influences of 115 36-month-olds’ executive processes (strategy use) and prepotent responses to waiting to open a gift (desire for the gift and frustration about waiting to open it). Using a pair of coupled second-order ODEs in a non-linear mixed effects framework, the study tested predictions for specific within- and between-child patterns of prepotent response-executive process coupling. Dynamic modeling results articulated the limits of 36-month olds’ strategic efforts. They engaged executive processes when their prepotent responding levels were high, which delayed the resurgence of prepotent responses, but ultimately did not damp prepotent responding over the course of the wait. There was, however, preliminary evidence that the effectiveness of 36-month-olds’ self-regulation depended upon child characteristics. Externalizing behavior problems were associated with more regulatory interference. Temperamental negative affectivity was marginally associated with more regulatory inefficiency. Compared with conventional methods of studying self-regulation, dynamic modeling yielded complementary and unique findings, suggesting its potential.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101125678
          30407
          Emotion
          Emotion
          Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
          1528-3542
          1931-1516
          7 December 2016
          12 January 2017
          June 2017
          01 June 2018
          : 17
          : 4
          : 684-699
          Affiliations
          [a ]The Pennsylvania State University
          [b ]German Institute for Economic Research (DIW), Berlin
          Author notes
          Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Pamela M. Cole, Department of Psychology, 210 Moore Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. Electronic email may be sent to pmc5@ 123456psu.edu

          Pamela M. Cole, 209 Moore Building, Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 and Jason J. Bendezú, 208 Moore Building, Department of Psychology are joint (*) first authors; Nilam Ram, 417 BBH Building, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; and Sy-Miin Chow, 413 BBH Building, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.

          Article
          PMC5882214 PMC5882214 5882214 nihpa834273
          10.1037/emo0000268
          5882214
          28080091
          3323e686-a7de-4398-8f05-643129b96151
          History
          Categories
          Article

          dynamical systems modeling,self-regulation,child development

          Comments

          Comment on this article