6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of two alternate PGF products in two estrus synchronization protocols in beef heifers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of a high concentrate, s.c. PGF compared with a conventionally concentrated, i.m. PGF in estrus synchronization protocols for heifers. In Exp. 1, 869 Angus-based beef heifers were enrolled at 8 locations. All heifers were exposed to the 7-d CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release ( CIDR) estrus synchronization protocol. On day 7 of the protocol heifers received 100 µg of GnRH i.m., and a CIDR insert for 7 d. On day 0, at CIDR removal, estrous detection patches were applied to heifers and, within location, heifers randomly received 1 of 2 PGF treatments: 5 mL of Lutalyse i.m. (CONTROL; n = 434) or a 2 mL of Lutalyse HighCon s.c. (HiCON; n = 435). A second GnRH injection was administered at 54 ± 2 h and heifers were fixed-time AI ( TAI). Heifers were evaluated for estrous activity at TAI by determining the activation of estrous detection patches. Pregnancy rates to AI (PR/AI) were diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography between 35 and 55 d after TAI. The percentage of heifers exhibiting estrus between day 0 and TAI did not differ ( P = 0.68) between CONTROL and HiCON treatments (47 vs. 46 ± 4%, respectively). Additionally, PR/AI were similar ( P = 0.65) between CONTROL and HiCON treatments (46 vs. 45 ± 3%). In Exp. 2, 190 Angus-based beef heifers were enrolled at 2 locations. Heifers were exposed to the melengestrol acetate ( MGA)—PGF protocol where they were offered 0.5 mg MGA per day from days 1 to 14. On day 33, heifers were randomly assigned to receive CONTROL ( n = 95) or HiCON ( n = 95) treatment, and estrous detection aids were applied. Heifers were exposed to AI 12 h after detection of estrus. Heifers not detected in estrus at location 1 received a second PGF injection 6 d after the initial PGF injection and were placed with fertile bulls. Heifers at location 2 that did not express estrus were administered 100 µg of GnRH i.m. and exposed to TAI 96 h after the initial PGF injection. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to diagnose PR/AI between 51 and 57 d after the initial PGF injection. The percentage of heifers exhibiting estrus during the estrus detection period was similar ( P = 0.40) between CONTROL and HiCON treatments (82 vs. 87 ± 4%). Furthermore, PR/AI were similar ( P = 0.62) between CONTROL and HiCON treatments (60 vs. 65 ± 5%). In summary, the 2 concentrations and corresponding routes of administration of PGF were similar in efficacy at synchronizing estrus in beef heifers.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Anim Sci
          J. Anim. Sci
          ansci
          Journal of Animal Science
          Oxford University Press (US )
          0021-8812
          1525-3163
          April 2018
          10 April 2018
          : 96
          : 4
          : 1388-1395
          Affiliations
          [1 ]North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, FL
          [2 ]University of Nebraska West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE
          [3 ]Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND
          [4 ]Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: gclamb@ 123456tamu.edu
          Article
          PMC6140874 PMC6140874 6140874 sky059
          10.1093/jas/sky059
          6140874
          29648600
          336359c2-5ab3-43da-91f5-cff9e7e79ff2
          © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)

          History
          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Categories
          Integrated Animal Science

          estrus synchronization,prostaglandin F2α ,beef heifer

          Comments

          Comment on this article