15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomized Trial of Machine Perfusion Versus Cold Storage in Recipients of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplants With High Incidence of Delayed Graft Function

      research-article
      , MD 1 , 2 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 12 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 14 , 15 , 15 , 1 , 1
      Transplantation Direct
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study compared the use of static cold storage versus continuous hypothermic machine perfusion in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients at high risk for delayed graft function (DGF).

          Methods

          In this national, multicenter, and controlled trial, 80 pairs of kidneys recovered from brain-dead deceased donors were randomized to cold storage or machine perfusion, transplanted, and followed up for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DGF. Secondary endpoints included the duration of DGF, hospital stay, primary nonfunction, estimated glomerular filtration rate, acute rejection, and allograft and patient survivals.

          Results

          Mean cold ischemia time was high but not different between the 2 groups (25.6 ± 6.6 hours vs 25.05 ± 6.3 hours, 0.937). The incidence of DGF was lower in the machine perfusion compared with cold storage group (61% vs. 45%, P = 0.031). Machine perfusion was independently associated with a reduced risk of DGF (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.95). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate tended to be higher at day 28 (40.6 ± 19.9 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 vs 49.0 ± 26.9 mL/min per 1.73 m 2; P = 0.262) and 1 year (48.3 ± 19.8 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 vs 54.4 ± 28.6 mL/min per 1.73 m 2; P = 0.201) in the machine perfusion group. No differences in the incidence of acute rejection, primary nonfunction (0% vs 2.5%), graft loss (7.5% vs 10%), or death (8.8% vs 6.3%) were observed.

          Conclusions

          In this cohort of recipients of deceased donor kidneys with high mean cold ischemia time and high incidence of DGF, the use of continuous machine perfusion was associated with a reduced risk of DGF compared with the traditional cold storage preservation method.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Delayed graft function in the kidney transplant.

          Acute kidney injury occurs with kidney transplantation and too frequently progresses to the clinical diagnosis of delayed graft function (DGF). Poor kidney function in the first week of graft life is detrimental to the longevity of the allograft. Challenges to understand the root cause of DGF include several pathologic contributors derived from the donor (ischemic injury, inflammatory signaling) and recipient (reperfusion injury, the innate immune response and the adaptive immune response). Progressive demand for renal allografts has generated new organ categories that continue to carry high risk for DGF for deceased donor organ transplantation. New therapies seek to subdue the inflammatory response in organs with high likelihood to benefit from intervention. Future success in suppressing the development of DGF will require a concerted effort to anticipate and treat tissue injury throughout the arc of the transplantation process. ©2011 The Authors Journal compilation © 2011 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation.

            Static cold storage is generally used to preserve kidney allografts from deceased donors. Hypothermic machine perfusion may improve outcomes after transplantation, but few sufficiently powered prospective studies have addressed this possibility. In this international randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned one kidney from 336 consecutive deceased donors to machine perfusion and the other to cold storage. All 672 recipients were followed for 1 year. The primary end point was delayed graft function (requiring dialysis in the first week after transplantation). Secondary end points were the duration of delayed graft function, delayed graft function defined by the rate of the decrease in the serum creatinine level, primary nonfunction, the serum creatinine level and clearance, acute rejection, toxicity of the calcineurin inhibitor, the length of hospital stay, and allograft and patient survival. Machine perfusion significantly reduced the risk of delayed graft function. Delayed graft function developed in 70 patients in the machine-perfusion group versus 89 in the cold-storage group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; P=0.01). Machine perfusion also significantly improved the rate of the decrease in the serum creatinine level and reduced the duration of delayed graft function. Machine perfusion was associated with lower serum creatinine levels during the first 2 weeks after transplantation and a reduced risk of graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.52; P=0.03). One-year allograft survival was superior in the machine-perfusion group (94% vs. 90%, P=0.04). No significant differences were observed for the other secondary end points. No serious adverse events were directly attributable to machine perfusion. Hypothermic machine perfusion was associated with a reduced risk of delayed graft function and improved graft survival in the first year after transplantation. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN83876362.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication of renal transplantation. The short-term consequences of DGF are well known, but the long-term relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival is controversial in the published literature. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to precisely estimate these relationships. We performed a literature search for original studies published through March 2007 pertaining to long-term (>6 months) outcomes of DGF. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes were patient survival, acute rejection and kidney function. When compared to patients without DGF, patients with DGF had a 41% increased risk of graft loss (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.56) at 3.2 years of follow-up. There was no significant relationship between DGF and patient survival at 5 years (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94-1.39). The mean creatinine in the non-DGF group was 1.6 mg/dl. Patients with DGF had a higher mean serum creatinine (0.66 mg/dl, 95% CI 0.57-0.74) compared to patients without DGF at 3.5 years of follow-up. DGF was associated with a 38% relative increase in the risk of acute rejection (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.29-1.47). The results of this meta-analysis emphasize and quantify the long-term detrimental association between DGF and important graft outcomes like graft survival, acute rejection and renal function. Efforts to prevent and treat DGF should be aggressively investigated in order to improve graft survival given the deficit in the number of kidney donors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Transplant Direct
                Transplant Direct
                TXD
                Transplantation Direct
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                2373-8731
                May 2017
                18 April 2017
                : 3
                : 5
                : e155
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Hospital do Rim, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [2] 2 Organização de Procura de Orgãos, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [3] 3 Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [4] 4 Kidney Transplant Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [5] 5 Hospital Samaritano, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [6] 6 Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [7] 7 Hospital Bandeirantes, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [8] 8 Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [9] 9 Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [10] 10 Hospital Dante Pazzanese, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [11] 11 Hospital de Base de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
                [12] 12 Department of Internal Medicine-UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rubião Jr, S/N, Botucatu, São Paulo.
                [13] 13 Santa Casa de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
                [14] 14 Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                [15] 15 Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Hélio Tedesco, MD, Nephrology Division, Hospital do Rim, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Borges Lagoa, 960-11 Andar, 04038-002, São Paulo, Brazil. ( heliotedesco@ 123456medfarm.com.br ).
                Article
                TXD50149 00004
                10.1097/TXD.0000000000000672
                5441986
                28573190
                337a48f0-6d8a-431c-816b-c923761acffe
                Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 11 January 2017
                : 12 January 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 0
                Categories
                016
                Kidney Transplantation
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                Comments

                Comment on this article