1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Relationship Between Gastric Emptying and Diurnal Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Trial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="s1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4022501e187">Context:</h5> <p id="d4022501e189">In type 1 diabetes (T1D), delayed gastric emptying (GE) may predispose to a mismatch between insulin delivery and glucose absorption. Previous studies evaluated, only partly, the relationship between delayed GE and postprandial, but not diurnal, glycemia. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="s2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4022501e192">Objective:</h5> <p id="d4022501e194">To assess the relationship between GE disturbances and glycemic control in T1D and the effects of accelerating GE on glycemic control. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="s3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4022501e197">Design, Setting, and Participants:</h5> <p id="d4022501e199">This was a randomized placebo-controlled trial in 30 patients with T1D on an insulin pump at an academic medical center. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="s4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4022501e202">Intervention(s):</h5> <p id="d4022501e204">GE was evaluated with a [ <sup>13</sup>C]- <i>Spirulina</i> breath test at baseline (GE <sub>baseline</sub>), during intravenous saline or erythromycin (2 or 3 mg/kg; GE <sub>iv</sub>), and after 7 days of oral erythromycin or placebo (GE <sub>oral</sub>). Weighed meals were provided throughout the study. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="s5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4022501e222">Main Outcome Measure(s):</h5> <p id="d4022501e224">These were GE and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="s6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4022501e227">Results:</h5> <p id="d4022501e229">The baseline glycosylated hemoglobin was 7.6% ± 0.8% (60 ± 8.7 mmol/mol); 12 patients (40%) had delayed GE; faster GE was associated with a greater postprandial CGM-based glucose, but slower GE was not associated with postprandial hypoglycemia (&lt;70 mg/dL). Intravenous (3 mg/kg) but not oral erythromycin accelerated GE. The relationship between GE and glycemia differed between the postprandial periods and the entire day. After adjusting for carbohydrate intake and insulin consumption, faster GE was associated with more hyperglycemia during the postprandial period but lower glucose values across the entire study. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="s7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d4022501e232">Conclusions:</h5> <p id="d4022501e234">In T1D, pharmacologically mediated acceleration of GE increases postprandial CGM-based glucose. In contrast, delayed GE is associated with greater CGM-based glucose values over the entire day. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d4022501e237">In 30 patients with T1D treated with intravenous, then oral, erythromycin or placebo, faster GE was associated with greater postprandial glucose but lower glucose during the entire day. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA(1c).

          The exact contributions of postprandial and fasting glucose increments to overall hyperglycemia remain controversial. The discrepancies between the data published previously might be caused by the interference of several factors. To test the effect of overall glycemic control itself, we analyzed the diurnal glycemic profiles of type 2 diabetic patients investigated at different levels of HbA(1c). In 290 non-insulin- and non-acarbose-using patients with type 2 diabetes, plasma glucose (PG) concentrations were determined at fasting (8:00 A.M.) and during postprandial and postabsorptive periods (at 11:00 A.M., 2:00 P.M., and 5:00 P.M.). The areas under the curve above fasting PG concentrations (AUC(1)) and >6.1 mmol/l (AUC(2)) were calculated for further evaluation of the relative contributions of postprandial (AUC(1)/AUC(2), %) and fasting [(AUC(2) - AUC(1))/AUC(2), %] PG increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia. The data were compared over quintiles of HbA(1c). The relative contribution of postprandial glucose decreased progressively from the lowest (69.7%) to the highest quintile of HbA(1c) (30.5%, P < 0.001), whereas the relative contribution of fasting glucose increased gradually with increasing levels of HbA(1c): 30.3% in the lowest vs. 69.5% in the highest quintile (P < 0.001). The relative contribution of postprandial glucose excursions is predominant in fairly controlled patients, whereas the contribution of fasting hyperglycemia increases gradually with diabetes worsening. These results could therefore provide a unifying explanation for the discrepancies as observed in previous studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis.

            This guideline presents recommendations for the evaluation and management of patients with gastroparesis. Gastroparesis is identified in clinical practice through the recognition of the clinical symptoms and documentation of delayed gastric emptying. Symptoms from gastroparesis include nausea, vomiting, early satiety, postprandial fullness, bloating, and upper abdominal pain. Management of gastroparesis should include assessment and correction of nutritional state, relief of symptoms, improvement of gastric emptying and, in diabetics, glycemic control. Patient nutritional state should be managed by oral dietary modifications. If oral intake is not adequate, then enteral nutrition via jejunostomy tube needs to be considered. Parenteral nutrition is rarely required when hydration and nutritional state cannot be maintained. Medical treatment entails use of prokinetic and antiemetic therapies. Current approved treatment options, including metoclopramide and gastric electrical stimulation (GES, approved on a humanitarian device exemption), do not adequately address clinical need. Antiemetics have not been specifically tested in gastroparesis, but they may relieve nausea and vomiting. Other medications aimed at symptom relief include unapproved medications or off-label indications, and include domperidone, erythromycin (primarily over a short term), and centrally acting antidepressants used as symptom modulators. GES may relieve symptoms, including weekly vomiting frequency, and the need for nutritional supplementation, based on open-label studies. Second-line approaches include venting gastrostomy or feeding jejunostomy; intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection was not effective in randomized controlled trials. Most of these treatments are based on open-label treatment trials and small numbers. Partial gastrectomy and pyloroplasty should be used rarely, only in carefully selected patients. Attention should be given to the development of new effective therapies for symptomatic control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes.

              Recently developed technologies for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus include a variety of pumps and pumps with glucose sensors. In this 1-year, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy of sensor-augmented pump therapy (pump therapy) with that of a regimen of multiple daily insulin injections (injection therapy) in 485 patients (329 adults and 156 children) with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes. Patients received recombinant insulin analogues and were supervised by expert clinical teams. The primary end point was the change from the baseline glycated hemoglobin level. At 1 year, the baseline mean glycated hemoglobin level (8.3% in the two study groups) had decreased to 7.5% in the pump-therapy group, as compared with 8.1% in the injection-therapy group (P<0.001). The proportion of patients who reached the glycated hemoglobin target (<7%) was greater in the pump-therapy group than in the injection-therapy group. The rate of severe hypoglycemia in the pump-therapy group (13.31 cases per 100 person-years) did not differ significantly from that in the injection-therapy group (13.48 per 100 person-years, P=0.58). There was no significant weight gain in either group. In both adults and children with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes, sensor-augmented pump therapy resulted in significant improvement in glycated hemoglobin levels, as compared with injection therapy. A significantly greater proportion of both adults and children in the pump-therapy group than in the injection-therapy group reached the target glycated hemoglobin level. (Funded by Medtronic and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00417989.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
                The Endocrine Society
                0021-972X
                1945-7197
                February 01 2017
                February 01 2017
                November 23 2016
                February 01 2017
                February 01 2017
                November 23 2016
                : 102
                : 2
                : 398-406
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and
                [2 ]Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
                [3 ]Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
                Article
                10.1210/jc.2016-2809
                5413165
                27880079
                33b7e50e-8f43-43e6-bbcf-b2e583f048db
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article