There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
In this paper, we show how ElectroEncephaloGraphic (EEG) and MagnetoEncephaloGraphic
(MEG) data can be analyzed statistically using nonparametric techniques. Nonparametric
statistical tests offer complete freedom to the user with respect to the test statistic
by means of which the experimental conditions are compared. This freedom provides
a straightforward way to solve the multiple comparisons problem (MCP) and it allows
to incorporate biophysically motivated constraints in the test statistic, which may
drastically increase the sensitivity of the statistical test. The paper is written
for two audiences: (1) empirical neuroscientists looking for the most appropriate
data analysis method, and (2) methodologists interested in the theoretical concepts
behind nonparametric statistical tests. For the empirical neuroscientist, a large
part of the paper is written in a tutorial-like fashion, enabling neuroscientists
to construct their own statistical test, maximizing the sensitivity to the expected
effect. And for the methodologist, it is explained why the nonparametric test is formally
correct. This means that we formulate a null hypothesis (identical probability distribution
in the different experimental conditions) and show that the nonparametric test controls
the false alarm rate under this null hypothesis.