5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Self-handicapping and self-esteem profiles and their relation to achievement goals Translated title: Perfiles de self-handicapping y autoestima y su relación con las metas de logro

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract: The present work seeks to deepen the knowledge of academic self-handicapping. The two objectives of this study were (a) to identify possible profiles of students from the combination of self-handicapping (behavioral and claimed) and self-esteem and (b) to analyze the differences among these profiles in terms of their achievement goals (learning, achievement-approach, achievement-avoidance and work-avoidance). Participants in this study included 1028 university students. To obtain the profiles, a Latent Profile Analysis was conducted. The differences among profiles in the achievement goals were analyzed by means of a MANCOVA, using gender and the course as covariables. Five student profiles were obtained: LSE/HSH (low self-esteem and high self-handicapping), LSE/HCSH (low self-esteem and high claimed self-handicapping), LSE/HBSH (low self-esteem and high behavioral self-handicapping), MSE/MSH (moderate self-esteem and moderate self-handicapping), and MSE/LSH (moderate self-esteem and low self-handicapping). These profiles differed significantly from one another in terms of their achievement goals. The results of this work contribute to the understanding of the motivational characteristics of self-handicapping students. Given how dysfunctional these strategies are, some psychoeducational guidelines aimed at preventing self-handicapping in the academic context are outlined.

          Translated abstract

          Resumen: El presente trabajo pretende profundizar en el conocimiento del self-handicapping académico. Dos son los objetivos de este estudio: (a) identificar posibles perfiles de estudiantes a partir de la combinación del self-handicapping (conductual y alegado) y la autoestima; y (b) analizar las diferencias entre estos perfiles en cuanto a sus metas de logro (aprendizaje, aproximación al rendimiento, evitación del rendimiento y evitación del trabajo). Participaron en la investigación 1028 estudiantes universitarios. Para la obtención de los perfiles se realizó un análisis de perfiles latentes. Las diferencias entre perfiles en las metas de logro se analizaron mediante un MANCOVA, tomando como covariables el género y el curso. Se obtuvieron cinco perfiles de estudiantes: BA/ASH (baja autoestima y alto self-handicapping); BA/ASHA (baja autoestima y alto self-handicapping alegado); BA/ASHC (baja autoestima y alto self-handicapping conductual); MA/MSH (moderada autoestima y moderado self-handicapping); y MA/BSH (moderada autoestima y bajo self-handicapping). Estos perfiles se diferenciaron entre sí significativamente en cuanto a sus metas de logro. Los resultados de este trabajo contribuyen a la comprensión de las características motivacionales de los estudiantes self-handicappers. Dado lo disfuncional que resultan estas estrategias, se plantean algunas pautas psicoeducativas dirigidas a la prevención del self-handicapping en el contexto académico.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students' Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?

            This meta-analysis addresses whether achievement goal researchers are using different labels for the same constructs or putting the same labels on different constructs. We systematically examined whether conceptual and methodological differences in the measurement of achievement goals moderated achievement goal intercorrelations and relationships with outcomes. We reviewed 243 correlational studies of self-reported achievement goals comprising a total of 91,087 participants. The items used to measure achievement goals were coded as being goal relevant (future-focused, cognitively represented, competence-related end states that the individual approaches or avoids) and were categorized according to the different conceptual definitions found within the literature. The results indicated that achievement goal-outcome and goal-goal correlations differed significantly depending on the goal scale chosen, the individual items used to assess goal strivings, and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample under study. For example, performance-approach goal scales coded as having a majority of normatively referenced items had a positive correlation with performance outcomes (r = .14), whereas scales with a majority of appearance and evaluative items had a negative relationship (r = -.14). Mastery-approach goal scales that contained goal-relevant language were not significantly related to performance outcomes (r = .05), whereas those that did not contain goal-relevant language had a positive relationship with performance outcomes (r = .14). We concluded that achievement goal researchers are using the same label for conceptually different constructs. This discrepancy between conceptual and operational definitions and the absence of goal-relevant language in achievement goal measures may be preventing productive theory testing, research synthesis, and practical application. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: translation and validation in university students.

              The aim of this study was to translate into Spanish and to validate the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), completed by 420 university students. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the model that best fit the data, both in the total sample and in the male and female subsamples, was the one-factor structure with method effects associated with positively worded items. The results indicated high, positive correlations between self-esteem and the five dimensions of self-concept. The scale showed satisfactory levels of internal consistency and temporal stability over a four-week period. Lastly, gender differences were obtained. These findings support the use of the RSES for the assessment of self-esteem in higher education.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                ap
                Anales de Psicología
                Anal. Psicol.
                Universidad de Murcia (Murcia, Murcia, Spain )
                0212-9728
                1695-2294
                December 2018
                : 34
                : 3
                : 545-554
                Affiliations
                [01] Galicia orgnameUniversidade da Coruña orgdiv1Department of Psychology Spain
                Article
                S0212-97282018000300016
                10.6018/analesps.34.3.319781
                33ebd615-5f96-4ba5-9270-3f1f66f71ac3

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 29 January 2018
                : 19 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 59, Pages: 10
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Social and Organizational Psychology

                self-esteem,self-handicapping conductual,self-handicapping alegado,autoestima,perfiles,metas de logro,behavioral self-handicapping,claimed self-handicapping,profiles,achievement goals

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log