2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Association of Change in Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Incident Cardiovascular Events

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e418">Question</h5> <p id="d3783173e420">Are changes in cardiovascular health associated with incident cardiovascular events?</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e423">Findings</h5> <p id="d3783173e425">In this prospective cohort study that included 9256 participants without cardiovascular disease (CVD), changes over 10 years in category of cardiovascular health, based on a composite metric, did not show a consistent association with incident CVD. For example, while increase from a moderate to a high category of cardiovascular health was associated with a significant hazard ratio of 0.39, decrease from a high to a low category of cardiovascular health was also associated with a significant hazard ratio of 0.49. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e428">Meaning</h5> <p id="d3783173e430">This study did not find a consistent relationship between direction of change in category of a composite metric of cardiovascular health and risk of CVD. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e434">Importance</h5> <p id="d3783173e436">There is consistent evidence of the association between ideal cardiovascular health and lower incident cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, most studies used a single measure of cardiovascular health. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e439">Objective</h5> <p id="d3783173e441">To examine how cardiovascular health changes over time and whether these changes are associated with incident CVD. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e444">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d3783173e446">Prospective cohort study in a UK general community (Whitehall II), with examinations of cardiovascular health from 1985/1988 (baseline) and every 5 years thereafter until 2015/2016 and follow-up for incident CVD until March 2017. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e449">Exposures</h5> <p id="d3783173e451">Using the 7 metrics of the American Heart Association (nonsmoking; and ideal levels of body mass index, physical activity, diet, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and total cholesterol), participants with 0 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 7 ideal metrics were categorized as having low, moderate, and high cardiovascular health. Change in cardiovascular health over 10 years between 1985/1988 and 1997/1999 was considered. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e454">Main Outcome and Measure</h5> <p id="d3783173e456">Incident CVD (coronary heart disease and stroke).</p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e459">Results</h5> <p id="d3783173e461">The study population included 9256 participants without prior CVD (mean [SD] age at baseline, 44.8 [6.0] years; 2941 [32%] women), of whom 6326 had data about cardiovascular health change. Over a median follow-up of 18.9 years after 1997/1999, 1114 incident CVD events occurred. In multivariable analysis and compared with individuals with persistently low cardiovascular health (consistently low group, 13.5% of participants; CVD incident rate per 1000 person-years, 9.6 [95% CI, 8.4-10.9]), there was no significant association with CVD risk in the low to moderate group (6.8% of participants; absolute rate difference per 1000 person-years, −1.9 [95% CI, −3.9 to 0.1]; HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.66-1.08]), the low to high group, (0.3% of participants; absolute rate difference per 1000 person-years, −7.7 [95% CI, −11.5 to −3.9]; HR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.03-1.35]), and the moderate to low group (18.0% of participants; absolute rate difference per 1000 person-years, −1.3 [95% CI, −3.0 to 0.3]; HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.80-1.15]). A lower CVD risk was observed in the consistently moderate group (38.9% of participants; absolute rate difference per 1000 person-years, −4.2 [95% CI, −5.5 to −2.8]; HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.53-0.74]), the moderate to high group (5.8% of participants; absolute rate difference per 1000 person-years, −6.4 [95% CI, −8.0 to −4.7]; HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.27-0.56]), the high to low group (1.9% of participants; absolute rate difference per 1000 person-years, −5.3 [95% CI, −7.8 to −2.8]; HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.29-0.83]), the high to moderate group (9.3% of participants; absolute rate difference per 1000 person-years, −4.5 [95% CI, −6.2 to −2.9]; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51-0.85]), and the consistently high group (5.5% of participants; absolute rate difference per 1000 person-years, −5.6 [95% CI, −7.4 to −3.9]; HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.40-0.80]). </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-joi180131-10"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3783173e464">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d3783173e466">Among a group of participants without CVD who received follow-up over a median 18.9 years, there was no consistent relationship between direction of change in category of a composite metric of cardiovascular health and risk of CVD. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d3783173e469">This cohort study uses UK Whitehall II study data to characterize changes in cardiovascular risk factors over 10 years and associations between change in risk and incident cardiovascular events among people without baseline cardiovascular disease. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond.

            This document details the procedures and recommendations of the Goals and Metrics Committee of the Strategic Planning Task Force of the American Heart Association, which developed the 2020 Impact Goals for the organization. The committee was charged with defining a new concept, cardiovascular health, and determining the metrics needed to monitor it over time. Ideal cardiovascular health, a concept well supported in the literature, is defined by the presence of both ideal health behaviors (nonsmoking, body mass index <25 kg/m(2), physical activity at goal levels, and pursuit of a diet consistent with current guideline recommendations) and ideal health factors (untreated total cholesterol <200 mg/dL, untreated blood pressure <120/<80 mm Hg, and fasting blood glucose <100 mg/dL). Appropriate levels for children are also provided. With the use of levels that span the entire range of the same metrics, cardiovascular health status for the whole population is defined as poor, intermediate, or ideal. These metrics will be monitored to determine the changing prevalence of cardiovascular health status and define achievement of the Impact Goal. In addition, the committee recommends goals for further reductions in cardiovascular disease and stroke mortality. Thus, the committee recommends the following Impact Goals: "By 2020, to improve the cardiovascular health of all Americans by 20% while reducing deaths from cardiovascular diseases and stroke by 20%." These goals will require new strategic directions for the American Heart Association in its research, clinical, public health, and advocacy programs for cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention in the next decade and beyond.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Depression as an aetiologic and prognostic factor in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of 6362 events among 146 538 participants in 54 observational studies.

              With negative treatment trials, the role of depression as an aetiological or prognostic factor in coronary heart disease (CHD) remains controversial. We quantified the effect of depression on CHD, assessing the extent of confounding by coronary risk factors and disease severity. Meta-analysis of cohort studies measuring depression with follow-up for fatal CHD/incident myocardial infarction (aetiological) or all-cause mortality/fatal CHD (prognostic). We searched MEDLINE and Science Citation Index until December 2003. In 21 aetiological studies, the pooled relative risk of future CHD associated with depression was 1.81 (95% CI 1.53-2.15). Adjusted results were included for 11 studies, with adjustment reducing the crude effect marginally from 2.08 (1.69-2.55) to 1.90 (1.49-2.42). In 34 prognostic studies, the pooled relative risk was 1.80 (1.50-2.15). Results adjusted for left ventricular function result were available in only eight studies; and this attenuated the relative risk from 2.18 to 1.53 (1.11-2.10), a 48% reduction. Both aetiological and prognostic studies without adjusted results had lower unadjusted effect sizes than studies from which adjusted results were included (P<0.01). Depression has yet to be established as an independent risk factor for CHD because of incomplete and biased availability of adjustment for conventional risk factors and severity of coronary disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                November 06 2018
                November 06 2018
                : 320
                : 17
                : 1793
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
                [2 ]INSERM, UMR-S970, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, Integrative Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease (Team 4), Paris, France
                [3 ]Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
                [4 ]INSERM, U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France
                [5 ]Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobert, Australia
                [7 ]Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2018.16975
                6248104
                30398604
                34604426-1053-42ba-b7e2-dfd6abc2686c
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article