6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An automated maze task for assessing hippocampus-sensitive memory in mice

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Alternation procedures in rodents are highly sensitive to manipulations of the hippocampus.

          • However as they require hand testing, they are low throughput and stressful for the animal.

          • An automated maze was developed for assessing alternation performance in mice.

          • Alternation performance was shown to be impaired in mice with lesions to the hippocampus.

          Abstract

          Memory deficits associated with hippocampal dysfunction are a key feature of a number of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. The discrete-trial rewarded alternation T-maze task is highly sensitive to hippocampal dysfunction. Normal mice have spontaneously high levels of alternation, whereas hippocampal-lesioned mice are dramatically impaired. However, this is a hand-run task and handling has been shown to impact crucially on behavioural responses, as well as being labour-intensive and therefore unsuitable for high-throughput studies. To overcome this, a fully automated maze was designed. The maze was attached to the mouse's home cage and the subject earned all of its food by running through the maze. In this study the hippocampal dependence of rewarded alternation in the automated maze was assessed. Bilateral hippocampal-lesioned mice were assessed in the standard, hand-run, discrete-trial rewarded alternation paradigm and in the automated paradigm, according to a cross-over design. A similarly robust lesion effect on alternation performance was found in both mazes, confirming the sensitivity of the automated maze to hippocampal lesions. Moreover, the performance of the animals in the automated maze was not affected by their handling history whereas performance in the hand-run maze was affected by prior testing history. By having more stable performance and by decreasing human contact the automated maze may offer opportunities to reduce extraneous experimental variation and therefore increase the reproducibility within and/or between laboratories. Furthermore, automation potentially allows for greater experimental throughput and hence suitability for use in assessment of cognitive function in drug discovery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus.

          The total numbers of neurons in five subdivisions of human hippocampi were estimated using unbiased stereological principles and systematic sampling techniques. The method addresses the problems associated with the results and conclusions of previous quantitative studies, virtually all of which have been based on biased estimates of neuron densities. For each subdivision, the total number of neurons was calculated as the product of the estimate of the volume of the neuron-containing layers and the estimate of the numerical density of neurons in the layers. Each hippocampus was cut into 3-mm-thick slabs, transverse to the rostrocaudal axis. One 70-micron-thick section from each slab was used in the analysis. The volumes of the layers containing neurons in five major subdivisions of the hippocampus (granule cell layer, hilus, CA3-2, CA1, and subiculum) were estimated with point-counting techniques after delineation of the layers on each section. The numerical densities of neurons in each subdivision were estimated on the same sections with optical disectors. The sampling used in both estimates was performed systematically in all three dimensions. In an example of five hippocampi, the mean numbers of neurons (CV = SD/mean) in the different subdivisions were as follows: granule cells 15 X 10(6) (0.28), hilus 2.0 X 10(6) (0.16), CA3-2 2.7 X 10(6) (0.22), CA1 16 X 10(6) (0.32), subiculum 4.5 X 10(6) (0.19). The stereological measurements contributed approximately 25% of the observed variance. Among the five subjects there was a significant inverse relationship between age (which ranged from 47 to 85 years) and the total number of neurons in CA1 (which ranged from 24 to 11 X 10(6)). An optimized sampling scheme for studies of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus has been designed on the basis of an analysis of variance of the estimates at different levels of the sampling scheme. Counting neurons in the five subdivisions of the human hippocampus with the optimized sampling scheme takes less than 4 hours.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impaired synaptic plasticity and learning in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice.

            We investigated synaptic communication and plasticity in hippocampal slices from mice overexpressing mutated 695-amino-acid human amyloid precursor protein (APP695SWE), which show behavioral and histopathological abnormalities simulating Alzheimer's disease. Although aged APP transgenic mice exhibit normal fast synaptic transmission and short term plasticity, they are severely impaired in in-vitro and in-vivo long-term potentiation (LTP) in both the CA1 and dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus. The LTP deficit was correlated with impaired performance in a spatial working memory task in aged transgenics. These deficits are accompanied by minimal or no loss of presynaptic or postsynaptic elementary structural elements in the hippocampus, suggesting that impairments in functional synaptic plasticity may underlie some of the cognitive deficits in these mice and, possibly, in Alzheimer's patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stereological methods for estimating the total number of neurons and synapses: issues of precision and bias.

              Bruce West (1999)
              The emergence of a new generation of stereological techniques for counting objects in histological sections has prompted a debate about whether or not these methods are better than previously available techniques when they are used to make estimates of the total numbers of neurons and synapses in a neural structure. During this debate, the concepts of an unbiased estimate and that of a precise estimate have often been confused. A full understanding of the distinction between these two separate aspects of an estimate is required in order to be able to appreciate the virtues of these new counting methods and to apply them correctly. This review intends to make the fundamental issues of this debate more clear, and describes (1) the fundamental differences between the newer design-based counting techniques and previously available assumption-based techniques, and (2) the distinction between an unbiased estimate and a precise estimate.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Behav Brain Res
                Behav. Brain Res
                Behavioural Brain Research
                Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
                0166-4328
                1872-7549
                15 March 2014
                15 March 2014
                : 261
                : 100
                : 249-257
                Affiliations
                [a ]Lilly Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Eli Lilly & Co Ltd, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, Surrey, UK
                [b ]Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
                [c ]Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK
                [d ]Department of Comparative Medicine, (and by courtesy) Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 287 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5410, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Lilly Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Eli Lilly & Co Ltd, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, Surrey, UK. Tel.: +44 01276 484287; fax: +44 01276 483525. Dix_Sophie@ 123456lilly.com
                Article
                S0166-4328(13)00752-3
                10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.009
                3923974
                24333574
                34b67ed3-876f-4674-a6b8-4ecf21304d13
                © 2013 The Authors

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 24 July 2013
                : 26 November 2013
                : 3 December 2013
                Categories
                Research Report

                Neurosciences
                automated,hippocampus,maze,mouse
                Neurosciences
                automated, hippocampus, maze, mouse

                Comments

                Comment on this article