5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Strategies to promote the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in healthcare settings: a scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT), is an approach for the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders, but is often underutilized in healthcare settings. Although the implementation of SBIRT is challenging, the use of multi-faceted and higher intensity strategies are more likely to result in the successful incorporation of SBIRT into practice in primary care settings. SBIRT may be used in different healthcare settings, and the context for implementation and types of strategies used to support implementation may vary by setting. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview regarding the use of strategies to support implementation of SBIRT in all healthcare settings and describe the associated outcomes.

          Methods

          A scoping review was conducted using CINAHL Complete, HealthBusiness FullTEXT, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Embase to search for articles published in English prior to September 2019. The search returned 462 citations, with 18 articles included in the review. Two independent reviewers extracted data from each article regarding the theory, design, timeline, location, setting, patient population, substance type, provider, sample size and type, implementation strategies, and implementation outcomes. The reviewers entered all extracted data entered into a table and then summarized the results.

          Results

          Most of the studies were conducted in the United States in primary care or emergency department settings, and the majority of studies focused on SBIRT to address alcohol use in adults. The most commonly used strategies to support implementation included training and educating stakeholders or developing stakeholder interrelationships. In contrast, only a few studies engaged patients or consumers in the implementation process. Efforts to support implementation often resulted in an increase in screening, but the evidence regarding the brief intervention is less clear, and most studies did not assess the reach or adoption of the referral to treatment.

          Discussion

          In addition to summarizing the strategies used to increase reach and adoption of SBIRT in healthcare settings, this scoping review identified multiple gaps in the literature. Two major gaps include implementation of SBIRT in acute care settings and the application of implementation theories to inform healthcare efforts to enable use of SBIRT.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A cost-benefit analysis of Wisconsin's screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment program: adding the employer's perspective.

          A previous cost-benefit analysis found Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) to be cost-beneficial from a societal perspective. This paper develops a cost-benefit model that includes the employer's perspective by considering the costs of absenteeism and impaired presenteeism due to problem drinking.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Increase Brief Alcohol and Drug Interventions on a Level I Trauma Service.

            Screening and brief intervention (SBI) decreases alcohol use and related consequences among trauma patients. Although SBI is required in Level I and II trauma centers, implementation often is difficult. This study used the Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to identify and implement measures to increase the number of patients receiving SBI at a Level I trauma center. A multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Committee with representation from the Trauma Service and SBI Team met monthly during 2011. Stepwise interventions included identifying a resident "champion" responsible for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment, including an SBI report at monthly trauma conferences, and incorporating SBI into the trauma order set. Outcomes measures were number of patients screened, patients screening positive, and the number of patients receiving SBI. At baseline, 170 of 362 patients (47%) were screened, 68/170 (40%) had positive screens, and 30/68 (44% of those with positive screens) received SBI services. Quarter 2 saw increases in patients screened-275/437 (63%), patients screening positive (106/275; 39%) and those receiving SBI (60/106; 57%). Increases culminated in Quarter 4 with screening 401/466 (86%; P < 0.001) patients, 208/401 (52%; P < 0.001) patients screening positive, and 114 patients (55%; P = 0.296) receiving services. Use of similar quality improvement measures nationwide could improve rates of provision of this important service.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of a knowledge translation intervention on physician screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment behaviour in a socioeconomically disadvantaged setting

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kellithoele@gmail.com
                lmoffat@iuhealth.org
                skonicek@iuhealth.org
                mlamchi@iuhealth.org
                enewkirk@iuhealth.org
                jasfulto@iu.edu
                newhouse@iu.edu
                Journal
                Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy
                Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy
                Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
                BioMed Central (London )
                1747-597X
                11 May 2021
                11 May 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 42
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.257413.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2287 3919, Robert Wood Johnson Future of Nursing Scholar, , Indiana University School of Nursing, ; 600 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
                [2 ]Sigma Theta Tau International Rising Star of Research and Scholarship, Indiana University Health Arnett Hospital, Purdue University, 5165 McCarty Lane, Lafayette, IN 47905 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.411569.e, ISNI 0000 0004 0440 2154, Indiana University Health, ; South Central Region, 601 West 2nd Street, Bloomington, IN 47403 USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.411569.e, ISNI 0000 0004 0440 2154, Indiana University Health, ; Fairbanks Hall, 340 West 10th Street, Suite 3200, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.411569.e, ISNI 0000 0004 0440 2154, Indiana University Health West, ; 1111 Ronald Reagan Parkway, Avon, IN 46123 USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.257413.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2287 3919, Indiana University School of Nursing, ; 600 Barnhill Drive, NU 132, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.257413.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2287 3919, Indiana University School of Nursing, Distinguished Professor, Indiana University, ; 600 Barnhill Drive, NU 132, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0084-5698
                Article
                380
                10.1186/s13011-021-00380-z
                8111985
                33388062
                34ea048b-31d1-4dd3-99ca-83bd83089c04
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 29 April 2021
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Health & Social care
                implementation,implementation strategies,screening, brief intervention, referral to treatment (sbirt),substance-related disorders,scoping review

                Comments

                Comment on this article