There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Baseline glucocorticoid (cort) levels are increasingly employed as physiological indices
of the relative condition or health of individuals and populations. Often, high cort
levels are assumed to indicate an individual or population in poor condition and with
low relative fitness (the Cort-Fitness Hypothesis). We review empirical support for
this assumption, and find that variation in levels of baseline cort is positively,
negatively, or non-significantly related to estimates of fitness. These relationships
between levels of baseline cort and fitness can vary within populations and can even
shift within individuals at different times in their life history. Overall, baseline
cort can predict the relative fitness of individuals and populations, but the relationship
is not always consistent or present.