13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Burden and health-related quality of life of eating disorders, including Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID), in the Australian population

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Little is known about the epidemiology and health related quality of life (HRQoL) of the new DSM-5 diagnoses, Binge Eating Disorder (BED) and Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) in the Australian population. We aimed to investigate the prevalance and burden of these disorders.

          Methods

          We conducted two sequential population-based surveys including individuals aged over 15 years who were interviewed in 2014 ( n = 2732) and 2015 ( n =3005). Demographic information and diagnostic features of DSM-5 eating disorders were asked including the occurrence of regular (at least weekly over the past 3 months) objective binge eating with levels of distress, extreme dietary restriction/fasting for weight/shape control, purging behaviors, overvaluation of shape and/or weight, and the presence of an avoidant/restrictive food intake without overvaluation of shape and/or weight. In 2014 functional impact or role performance was measured with the ‘days out of role’ question and in 2015, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was assessed with the Short Form −12 item questionnaire (SF-12v1).

          Results

          The 2014 and 2015 3-month prevalence of eating disorders were: anorexia nervosa-broad 0.4% (95% CI 0.2–0.7) and 0.5% (0.3–0.9); bulimia nervosa 1.1% (0.7–1.5) and 1.2% (0.9–1.7); ARFID 0.3% (0.1–0.5) and 0.3% (0.2–0.6). The 2015 3-month prevalence rates were: BED-broad 1.5% (1.1–2.0); Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder (OSFED) 3.2 (2.6–3.9); and Unspecified Feeding or Eating Disorder (UFED) 10.4% (0.9–11.5). Most people with OSFED had atypical anorexia nervosa and majority with UFED were characterised by having recurrent binge eating without marked distress. Eating disorders were represented throughout sociodemographic groups and those with bulimia nervosa and BED-broad had mean weight (BMI, kg/m 2) in the obese range. Mental HRQoL was poor in all eating disorder groups but particularly poor for those with BED-broad and ARFID. Individuals with bulimia nervosa, BED-broad and OSFED-Purging Disorder also had poor physical HRQoL. ARFID and bulimia nervosa groups had lower role performance than those without an eating disorder.

          Conclusions

          Whilst full spectrum eating disorders, including ARFID, were less common than OSFED or UFED, they were associated with poor mental HRQoL and significant functional impairment. The present study supports the movement of eating disorders in to broader socio demographic groups including men, socio-economic disadvantaged groups and those with obesity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

              Simple interval estimate methods for proportions exhibit poor coverage and can produce evidently inappropriate intervals. Criteria appropriate to the evaluation of various proposed methods include: closeness of the achieved coverage probability to its nominal value; whether intervals are located too close to or too distant from the middle of the scale; expected interval width; avoidance of aberrations such as limits outside [0,1] or zero width intervals; and ease of use, whether by tables, software or formulae. Seven methods for the single proportion are evaluated on 96,000 parameter space points. Intervals based on tail areas and the simpler score methods are recommended for use. In each case, methods are available that aim to align either the minimum or the mean coverage with the nominal 1 -alpha.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                p.hay@westernsydney.edu.au
                deborah.mitchison@mq.edu.au
                aberlo@ozemail.com.au
                david.gonzalez@adelaide.edu.au
                nigel.stocks@adelaide.edu.au
                stephen.touyz@sydney.edu.au
                Journal
                J Eat Disord
                J Eat Disord
                Journal of Eating Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-2974
                3 July 2017
                3 July 2017
                2017
                : 5
                : 21
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, , Western Sydney University, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2158 5405, GRID grid.1004.5, Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, , Macquarie University, ; Sydney, Australia
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, School of Medicine, , Western Sydney University, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, , Western Sydney University, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7304, GRID grid.1010.0, Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence to Reduce Inequality in Heart Disease, , The University of Adelaide, ; Adelaide, SA Australia
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, , The University of Sydney, ; Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-6856
                Article
                149
                10.1186/s40337-017-0149-z
                5494787
                28680630
                34fb3be3-2737-4f7f-98bf-602f1a0b6360
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 20 February 2017
                : 24 April 2017
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                binge eating disorder,anorexia nervosa,bulimia nervosa,prevalence

                Comments

                Comment on this article