32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hypofractionated electron-beam radiation therapy for keloids: retrospective study of 568 cases with 834 lesions

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We aimed to analyze the outcomes of hypofractionated high-energy electron beam radiotherapy for the treatment of keloids. From February 1998 to January 2012, 568 patients with a total of 834 keloids underwent radiotherapy: 826 lesions with postoperative radiotherapy, and 36 with skin-grafting. Lesion size was >5 cm in 335 keloids. An electron-beam of 6 or 7 MeV was used, with a total dose of 18 Gy (two fractions with a 1-week interval) covering the lesion with a 1-cm margin. The time between surgery and radiotherapy was 24–48 h. Skin-grafted patients underwent radiotherapy 10–15 days after the operation. The median follow-up was 40 months (range: 12–160 months). The local control rate was 88.25% (736/834). The relapse rate was 9.59% (80/834), and the time to relapse was 6–28 months (median: 12 months). Univariate analyses showed that gender, age, keloid size, keloid site, skin grafting, and operation-to-irradiation interval influenced the local control rate. Multivariate analysis showed that the relapse rate was correlated with gender ( P = 0.048), age ( P < 0.01), operation-to-irradiation interval ( P < 0.01), keloid site ( P < 0.01), surgical method ( P = 0.04) and keloid size ( P < 0.02). Adverse effects were observed in 9.83% (82/834). No radiation-induced cancers were observed. Hypofractionated high-energy electron beam radiotherapy for keloids yielded excellent outcomes, especially in cases without skin grafting. Early postoperative radiotherapy with limited hypofractionation could be a good choice for keloid treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hypertrophic scars and keloids--a review of their pathophysiology, risk factors, and therapeutic management.

          Hypertrophic scars and keloids result from an abnormal fibrous wound healing process in which tissue repair and regeneration-regulating mechanism control is lost. These abnormal fibrous growths present a major therapeutic dilemma and challenge to the plastic surgeon because they are disfiguring and frequently recur. To provide updated clinical and experimental information on hypertrophic scars and keloids so that physicians can better understand and properly treat such lesions. A Medline literature search was performed for relevant publications and for diverse strategies for management of hypertrophic scars and keloids. The growing understanding of the molecular processes of normal and abnormal wound healing is promising for discovery of novel approaches for the management of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Although optimal treatment of these lesions remains undefined, successful healing can be achieved only with combined multidisciplinary therapeutic regimens.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Up-to-date approach to manage keloids and hypertrophic scars: a useful guide.

            Keloids and hypertrophic scars occur anywhere from 30 to 90% of patients, and are characterized by pathologically excessive dermal fibrosis and aberrant wound healing. Both entities have different clinical and histochemical characteristics, and unfortunately still represent a great challenge for clinicians due to lack of efficacious treatments. Current advances in molecular biology and genetics reveal new preventive and therapeutical options which represent a hope to manage this highly prevalent, chronic and disabling problem, with long-term beneficial outcomes and improvement of quality of life. While we wait for these translational clinical products to be marketed, however, it is imperative to know the basics of the currently existing wide array of strategies to deal with excessive scars: from the classical corticotherapy, to the most recent botulinum toxin and lasers. The main aim of this review paper is to offer a useful up-to-date guideline to prevent and treat keloids and hypertrophic scars.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The most current algorithms for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

              Rei Ogawa (2010)
              Previous reports on the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids have not described clear algorithms for multimodal therapies. This article presents an evidence-based review of previous articles and proposes algorithms for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids. The methodologic quality of the clinical trials was evaluated, and the baseline characteristics of the patients and the interventions that were applied and their outcomes were extracted. Important factors that promote hypertrophic scar/keloid development include mechanical forces on the wound, wound infection, and foreign body reactions. For keloids, the treatment method that should be used depends on whether scar contractures (especially joint contractures) are present and whether the keloids are small and single, or large and multiple. Small and single keloids can be treated radically by surgery with adjuvant therapy (which includes radiation or corticosteroid injections) or by nonsurgical monotherapy (which includes corticosteroid injections, cryotherapy, laser, and antitumor/immunosuppressive agents such as 5-fluorouracil). Large and multiple keloids are difficult to treat radically and are currently only treatable by multimodal therapies that aim to relieve symptoms. After a sequence of treatments, long-term follow-up is recommended. Conservative therapies, which include gel sheeting, taping fixation, compression therapy, external and internal agents, and makeup (camouflage) therapy, should be administered on a case-by-case basis. The increase in the number of randomized controlled trials over the past decade has greatly improved scar management, although these studies suffer from various limitations. The hypertrophic scar/keloid treatment algorithms that are currently available are likely to be significantly improved by future high-quality clinical trials.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Radiat Res
                J. Radiat. Res
                jrr
                jrr
                Journal of Radiation Research
                Oxford University Press
                0449-3060
                1349-9157
                September 2015
                28 July 2015
                28 July 2015
                : 56
                : 5
                : 811-817
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital , Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College , Bei Jing, 100000, China
                [2 ]Department of Orthopedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital , Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College , Bei Jing, 100000, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100000, China. Tel: +86-135-2103-9164; Email: zhangfuquan3@ 123456sina.com
                Article
                rrv031
                10.1093/jrr/rrv031
                4577000
                26224888
                350378c4-b03e-4089-95fd-25d17ea5c00f
                © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 17 November 2014
                : 8 March 2015
                : 1 April 2015
                Categories
                Oncology

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                keloids,radiotherapy,electron beam,prognosis,assessment
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                keloids, radiotherapy, electron beam, prognosis, assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article