25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Efficacy of opioid rotation to continuous parenteral hydromorphone in advanced cancer patients failing on other opioids

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The effectiveness of an opioid rotation to parenteral hydromorphone in advanced cancer patients has never been investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy and side effects of parenteral hydromorphone on serious cancer-related pain.

          Methods

          We included 104 consecutive advanced cancer patients who were extensively pretreated with opioids. They were rotated to parenteral hydromorphone because they failed to achieve adequate pain relief on other opioids. Pain intensity and side effects were daily assessed. The moment of adequate pain control was defined as the first of at least 2 consecutive days when the mean pain intensity at rest was ≤4 (on a 0–10 numeric rating scale) and side effects were tolerable.

          Results

          The reasons for rotation to parenteral hydromorphone were inadequate pain control with/without expected delivery problems due to high opioid dosages ( n = 61) and intolerable side effects with persistent pain ( n = 43). Adequate pain control was achieved in 86 patients (83%) within a mean of 5 days. Eight of 86 patients still had side effects, but these were scored as acceptable. The mean pain intensity at rest decreased from 5.4 [standard deviation (sd) = 2.1] to 2.4 (sd = 1.5; p < 0.001). The median failure-free treatment period was 57 days and covered a substantial part of the median survival of 78 days in the responding patients.

          Conclusions

          In advanced cancer patients with serious unstable cancer-related pain refractory to other opioids, continuous parenteral administration of hydromorphone often results in long-lasting adequate pain control and should be considered even after extensive pretreatment with opioids.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Validation of World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study.

          This paper reports on the experience gained using World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief over a 10-year period in an anaesthesiology-based pain service associated with a palliative care programme. The course of treatment of 2118 patients was assessed prospectively over a period of 140,478 treatment days. Non-opioid analgesics (WHO step I) were used on 11%, weak opioids (WHO step II) on 31% and strong opioids (WHO step III) on 49% of treatment days. Administration was via the enteral route on 82% and parenterally on 9% of treatment days. On the remaining days, either spinally applied opioids (2%) or other treatments (6%) were utilised. Fifty-six percent of the patients were treated with morphine. Morphine dose escalation was observed in about one-half of the patients being cared for until death, whereas the other half had stable or decreasing doses over the course of treatment. Co-analgesics were administered on 37% of days, most often antidepressants (15%), anticonvulsants (13%) and corticosteroids (13%). Adjuvants to treat symptoms other than pain were prescribed on 79% of days, most commonly laxatives (42%), histamine-2-receptor antagonists (39%) and antiemetics (35%). In addition, palliative antineoplastic treatment was performed in 42%, nerve blocks in 8%, physiotherapy in 5%, psychotherapy in 3% and TENS in 3% of patients. A highly significant pain reduction was achieved within the 1st week of treatment (P < 0.001). Over the whole treatment period, good pain relief was reported in 76%, satisfactory efficacy in 12% and inadequate efficacy in 12% of patients. In the final days of life, 84% rated their pain as moderate or less, while 10% were unable to give a rating. Analgesics remained constantly effective in all 3 steps of the WHO ladder. Other clinical symptoms were likewise significantly reduced at 1 week after initial assessment, with the exception of neuropsychiatric symptoms. During the course of treatment, the latter were the major symptoms on 23% of days, followed by nausea (23%), constipation (23%) and anorexia (20%). Our results emphasise once again the marked efficacy and low rate of complications associated with oral and parenteral analgesic therapy as the mainstay of pain treatment in the palliative care of patients with advanced cancer. Wide dissemination of WHO guidelines among doctors and healthcare workers is thus necessary to effect a clear improvement in the treatment of the many patients suffering from cancer pain in the clinical and home setting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations

            An expert working group of the European Association for Palliative Care has revised and updated its guidelines on the use of morphine in the management of cancer pain. The revised recommendations presented here give guidance on the use of morphine and the alternative strong opioid analgesics which have been introduced in many parts of the world in recent years. Practical strategies for dealing with difficult situations are described presenting a consensus view where supporting evidence is lacking. The strength of the evidence on which each recommendation is based is indicated. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of cancer pain.

              Patients with cancer have diverse symptoms, impairments in physical and psychological functioning, and other difficulties that can undermine their quality of life. If inadequately controlled, pain can have a profoundly adverse impact on the patient and his or her family. The critical importance of pain management as part of routine cancer care has been forcefully advanced by WHO, international and national professional organisations, and governmental agencies. The prevalence of chronic pain is about 30-50% among patients with cancer who are undergoing active treatment for a solid tumour and 70-90% among those with advanced disease. Prospective surveys indicate that as many as 90% of patients could attain adequate relief with simple drug therapies, but this success rate is not achieved in routine practice. Inadequate management of pain is the result of various issues that include: undertreatment by clinicians with insufficient knowledge of pain assessment and therapy; inappropriate concerns about opioid side-effects and addiction; a tendency to give lower priority to symptom control than to disease management; patients under-reporting of pain and non-compliance with therapy; and impediments to optimum analgesic therapy in the healthcare system. To improve the management of cancer pain, every practitioner involved in the care of these patients must ensure that his or her medical information is current and that patients receive appropriate education.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-10-7041439 , +31-10-7041003 , w.h.oldenmenger@erasmusmc.nl
                Journal
                Support Care Cancer
                Support Care Cancer
                Supportive Care in Cancer
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0941-4355
                1433-7339
                23 August 2011
                23 August 2011
                August 2012
                : 20
                : 8
                : 1639-1647
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of Anaesthesiology, Erasmus MC Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Neuro-oncology, Erasmus MC Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                1254
                10.1007/s00520-011-1254-1
                3390689
                21861200
                351905df-ac6b-4fef-8926-64f2066451fb
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                : 25 May 2011
                : 9 August 2011
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2012

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                hydromorphone,analgesics,opioids,neoplasm,parenteral infusions,pain
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                hydromorphone, analgesics, opioids, neoplasm, parenteral infusions, pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article