3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measuring next of kin’s experience of participation in the care of older people in nursing homes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Lack of conceptual clarity and measurement methods have led to underdeveloped efforts to measure experience of participation in care by next of kin to older people in nursing homes.

          Objective

          We sought to assess the measurement properties of items aimed at operationalizing participation in care by next of kin, applied in nursing homes.

          Methods

          A total of 37 items operationalizing participation were administered via a questionnaire to 364 next of kin of older people in nursing homes. Measurement properties were tested with factor analysis and Rasch model analysis.

          Results

          The response rate to the questionnaire was 81% (n = 260). Missing responses per item varied between <0.5% and 10%. The 37 items were found to be two-dimensional, and 19 were deleted based on conceptual reasoning and Rasch model analysis. One dimension measured communication and trust (nine items, reliability 0.87) while the other measured collaboration in care (nine items, reliability 0.91). Items successfully operationalized a quantitative continuum from lower to higher degrees of participation, and were found to generally fit well with the Rasch model requirements, without disordered thresholds or differential item functioning. Total scores could be calculated based on the bifactor subscale structure (reliability 0.92). Older people (≥ 65 years) reported a higher degree of communication and trust and bifactor total scores than younger people (p < 0.05 in both cases). People with a specific contact person experienced a higher degree of participation in the two subscales and the bifactor total score (p < 0.05 in all three instances).

          Conclusion

          Psychometric properties revealed satisfactory support for use, in nursing home settings, of the self-reported Next of Kin Participation in Care questionnaire, with a bifactor structure. Additional research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the scales’ abilities to identify changes after intervention.

          Trial registration

          The KUPA project has Clinical Trials number NCT02708498.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Critical Values for Yen’s Q3: Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations

          The assumption of local independence is central to all item response theory (IRT) models. Violations can lead to inflated estimates of reliability and problems with construct validity. For the most widely used fit statistic Q3, there are currently no well-documented suggestions of the critical values which should be used to indicate local dependence (LD), and for this reason, a variety of arbitrary rules of thumb are used. In this study, an empirical data example and Monte Carlo simulation were used to investigate the different factors that can influence the null distribution of residual correlations, with the objective of proposing guidelines that researchers and practitioners can follow when making decisions about LD during scale development and validation. A parametric bootstrapping procedure should be implemented in each separate situation to obtain the critical value of LD applicable to the data set, and provide example critical values for a number of data structure situations. The results show that for the Q3 fit statistic, no single critical value is appropriate for all situations, as the percentiles in the empirical null distribution are influenced by the number of items, the sample size, and the number of response categories. Furthermore, the results show that LD should be considered relative to the average observed residual correlation, rather than to a uniform value, as this results in more stable percentiles for the null distribution of an adjusted fit statistic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people.

            To determine the minimum detectable change at 95% confidence for the Berg Balance Scale in a group of elderly people, undergoing physiotherapy rehabilitation. Multi-centre, test-retest design. Cross-sectional sample of convenience of people over 65 years (n = 118) without a previous history of stroke, Parkinson's disease or recent hip arthroplasty. RATERS: Physiotherapists working with elderly people, drawn from the Physiotherapy Research into Older People group, ranging in experience from newly qualified to 39 years qualified. Each participant was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale and again within 48 hours by the same physiotherapist. The minimum detectable change at 95% was established. A change of 4 points is needed to be 95% confident that true change has occurred if a patient scores within 45-56 initially, 5 points if they score within 35-44, 7 points if they score within 25-34 and, finally, 5 points if their initial score is within 0-24 on the Berg Balance Scale. A clinician with a working knowledge of these minimum detectable change values can be up to 95% confident that a true change or not a true change in a patients' functional balance has occurred and can therefore alter their interventions accordingly to ensure quality, focused rehabilitation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Mandatory TB notification in Mysore city, India: Have we heard the private practitioner’s plea?

              Background The Government of India, made TB notification by private healthcare providers mandatory from May 2012 onwards. The National TB Programme developed a case based web based online reporting mechanism called NIKSHAY. However, the notification by private providers has been very low. We conducted the present study to determine the awareness, practice and anticipated enablers related to TB notification among private practitioners in Mysore city during 2014. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among private practitioners of Mysore city in south India. The private practitioners in the city were identified and 258 representative practitioners using probability proportional to size were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaire. Results Among the 258 study participants, only 155 (60%) respondents agreed to a detailed interview. Among those interviewed, 141 (91%) were aware that TB is a notifiable disease; however 127 (82%) of them were not aware of process of notification and NIKSHAY. Only one in six practitioners was registered in NIKSHAY, while one in three practitioners are notifying without registration. The practitioners expected certain enablers from the programme like free drugs, training to notify in NIKSHAY and timely feedback. 74 (47%) opined that notification should be backed by legal punitive measures. Conclusion The programme should develop innovative strategies that provide enablers, address concerns of practitioners while having simple mechanisms for TB notification. The programme should strengthen its inherent capacity to monitor TB notification. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1943-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Project administrationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                31 January 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 1
                : e0228379
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
                [2 ] Research Platform for Collaboration for Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden
                [3 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
                University of Copenhagen, DENMARK
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4820-6203
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1062-2789
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6230-7583
                Article
                PONE-D-19-14214
                10.1371/journal.pone.0228379
                6994140
                32004352
                3556e91c-49d6-459b-81a3-47c3ae46fdfb
                © 2020 Westergren et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 May 2019
                : 14 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 4, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: the Swedish Research Council
                Award ID: grant number 2014-2759
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Vårdal Foundation
                Award ID: grant number 2014-0071
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: the Foundation of Hedda Andersson
                Award ID: (no number)
                Award Recipient :
                This study is part of the KUPA project and is funded by the Swedish Research Council (grant number 2014-2759); Vårdal Foundation (grant number 2014-0071); Medical Faculty, Lund University; The Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University; The City of Lund. An additional grant from the Foundation of Hedda Andersson, Lund University, made this study possible. The authors declare no conflict of interest and that the grant sponsors had no role in the study design; data collection, analyses, or interpretation; writing of the manuscript; or decision to publish the results.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Facilities
                Nursing Homes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Palliative Care
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Questionnaires
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Allied Health Care Professionals
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Factor Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics
                Statistical Methods
                Factor Analysis
                Engineering and Technology
                Equipment
                Measurement Equipment
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Quality of Care
                Custom metadata
                Data are available from the Swedish National Data Service ( https://snd.gu.se/en/catalogue/study/snd1135), and upon request from the first author.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article