9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      3D printed PLA Army-Navy retractors when used as linear retractors yield clinically acceptable tolerances

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Modern low-cost 3D printing technologies offer the promise of access to surgical tools in resource scarce areas, however optimal designs for manufacturing have not yet been established. We explore how the optimization of 3D printing parameters when manufacturing polylactic acid filament based Army-Navy retractors vastly increases the strength of retractors, and investigate sources of variability in retractor strength, material cost, printing time, and parameter limitations.

          Methods

          Standard retractors were printed from various polylactic acid filament spools intra-manufacturer and inter-manufacturer to measure variability in retractor strength. Printing parameters were systematically varied to determine optimum printing parameters. These parameters include retractor width, thickness, infill percentage, infill geometry, perimeter number, and a reinforced joint design. Estimated retractor mass from computer models allows us to estimate material cost.

          Results

          We found statistically significant differences in retractor strength between spools of the same manufacturer and between manufacturers. We determined the true strength optimized retractor to have 30% infill, 3 perimeters, 0.25 in. thickness, 0.75 in. width, and has “Triangle” infill geometry and reinforced joints, failing at more than 15X the threshold for clinically excessive retraction and costs $1.25 USD.

          Conclusions

          The optimization of 3D printed Army-Navy retractors greatly improve the efficacy of this instrument and expedite the adoption of 3D printing technology in many diverse fields in medicine not necessarily limited to resource poor settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review

          Background Three-dimensional (3D) printing has numerous applications and has gained much interest in the medical world. The constantly improving quality of 3D-printing applications has contributed to their increased use on patients. This paper summarizes the literature on surgical 3D-printing applications used on patients, with a focus on reported clinical and economic outcomes. Methods Three major literature databases were screened for case series (more than three cases described in the same study) and trials of surgical applications of 3D printing in humans. Results 227 surgical papers were analyzed and summarized using an evidence table. The papers described the use of 3D printing for surgical guides, anatomical models, and custom implants. 3D printing is used in multiple surgical domains, such as orthopedics, maxillofacial surgery, cranial surgery, and spinal surgery. In general, the advantages of 3D-printed parts are said to include reduced surgical time, improved medical outcome, and decreased radiation exposure. The costs of printing and additional scans generally increase the overall cost of the procedure. Conclusion 3D printing is well integrated in surgical practice and research. Applications vary from anatomical models mainly intended for surgical planning to surgical guides and implants. Our research suggests that there are several advantages to 3D-printed applications, but that further research is needed to determine whether the increased intervention costs can be balanced with the observable advantages of this new technology. There is a need for a formal cost–effectiveness analysis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Three-dimensional printing surgical instruments: are we there yet?

              The applications for rapid prototyping have expanded dramatically over the last 20 y. In recent years, additive manufacturing has been intensely investigated for surgical implants, tissue scaffolds, and organs. There is, however, scant literature to date that has investigated the viability of three-dimensional (3D) printing of surgical instruments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Joshuavchen@berkeley.edu
                Alexis.Dang@ucsf.edu
                carlinseanlee@gmail.com
                Alan.dang@ucsf.edu
                Journal
                3D Print Med
                3D Print Med
                3D Printing in Medicine
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2365-6271
                21 November 2019
                21 November 2019
                December 2019
                : 5
                : 16
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, GRID grid.266102.1, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , University of California, ; San Francisco, CA USA
                [2 ]Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Section, San Francisco VA Health Center, San Francisco, CA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1949-2917
                Article
                53
                10.1186/s41205-019-0053-z
                6873412
                31754879
                356f5fa5-dbc9-4de3-98d4-551783c5f45c
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 17 July 2019
                : 24 October 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008070, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco;
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                3d printing,additive manufacturing,medical devices,surgical instruments,optimization,polylactic acid

                Comments

                Comment on this article