16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Weed interference period and economic threshold level of ryegrass in wheat

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ABSTRACT The study of weed interference periods and the economic threshold level (ETL) of weeds on crops allows the adoption of management methods and the rationalized use of herbicides. The objective of this study was to determine the periods of interference and to test mathematical models to determine the economic threshold level of ryegrass in the wheat crop. Two experiments were carried out in a randomized block design with four replications. The first experiment was conducted in the 2014/2015 agricultural season. The periods of interference and control of ryegrass were studied in wheat. The periods of interference and/or control were: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 120 days after emergence (DAE). The second experiment was conducted in the 2016/2017 agricultural season. The ETLs were studied, being the treatments composed of wheat cultivars and 12 populations of ryegrass, in competition with the respective cultivars. The results allowed concluding that the management methods of weed ryegrass must be adopted in the period between 11 and 21 days after crop emergence, which is described as a critical period of control of this weed. The wheat grain yield loss competing with ryegrass reached 59% when grown with ryegrass. For ETL, the linear regression model of the rectangular hyperbola adequately estimates grain yield losses in the presence of ryegrass. The cultivar presenting the lowest values of ETL, that is, less capacity to live with the weed, was TBIO Alvorada. The other cultivars presented similar ETL values.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Aspects of the Design and Interpretation of Competition (Interference) Experiments

          The design and analysis of competition experiments should be based on an unambiguous objective. Recent criticisms of particular designs have been made without reference to objectives and may be misleading. Three common designs are discussed: additive, replacement series, and response surface. Additive designs are well suited to agronomic objectives; replacement series are useful for comparing pairs of species; response surface designs can be used for most objectives but may be unnecessarily complex. The published criticisms of additive and replacement series designs are argued to be acceptable limitations within the bounds of the objectives for which they are used. Concerns about these designs confounding density and proportion are irrelevant to the objectives for which they are most suited. The continued use of multiple comparison tests is argued to be illogical. Regression approaches to analysis are more relevant, many non-linear equations are now easy to fit to data and these can be used without the need for linearization. However, there are various pitfalls not adequately reported to date. In particular, error structures need to be checked carefully and over-elaborate equations should be avoided.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models

            R Cousens (1985)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Experimental Methods for Crop–Weed Competition Studies

              The annual global economic loss caused by weeds has been estimated at more than $100 billion U.S. dollars (Appleby et al. 2000). Additionally, worldwide annual herbicide sales are in the range of U.S. $25 billion (Agrow 2003). In light of these large dollar figures, it becomes clear that a greater understanding of crop—weed interactions is essential in order to develop cost-effective and sustainable weed management practices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                brag
                Bragantia
                Bragantia
                Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (Campinas, SP, Brazil )
                0006-8705
                1678-4499
                September 2019
                : 78
                : 3
                : 409-422
                Affiliations
                [03] Santa Maria Rio Grande do Sul orgnameUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria orgdiv1Departamento de Fitotecnia Brazil
                [01] Erechim Santa Catarina orgnameUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sul orgdiv1Departamento de Fitotecnia Brazil
                [02] Chapecó Santa Catarina orgnameUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sul orgdiv1Departamento de Fitotecnia Brazil
                Article
                S0006-87052019000300409
                10.1590/1678-4499.20180426
                3598538e-5347-4887-81e4-ef8dd8ac0b2b

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 12 November 2018
                : 22 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 45, Pages: 14
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Plant Protection

                Triticum aestivum,Lolium multiflorum,competition
                Triticum aestivum, Lolium multiflorum, competition

                Comments

                Comment on this article