12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Performance of rapid SOFIA Influenza A+B test compared to Luminex x-TAG respiratory viral panel assay in the diagnosis of influenza A, B, and subtype H3

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Influenza is an acute respiratory illness caused by influenza A or B viruses that occur in outbreaks, mainly during the winter season. Rapid laboratory diagnosis of influenza can help guide the clinical management of suspected patients effectively. Clinical sensitivities and specificities of the rapid influenza diagnostic tests have varied considerably in the literature. Most of these studies are evaluated using previously frozen or stored specimens that had previously tested positive. This study compares the performance of the rapid SOFIA Influenza A+B test to nucleic acid multiplex test x-TAG respiratory viral panel (RVP) assay in freshly collected nasal aspirates and measured simultaneously by both assays. Retrospective data from 1649 nasal aspirates (September 2014 to May 2015) collected from adults as well as from children tested simultaneously by both rapid SOFIA Influenza A+B FIA immunofluorescence (Quidel, San Diego, CA) and qualitative nucleic acid multiplex RVP assay X-TAG Luminex technology (Luminex, Austin, Texas, USA) were analyzed. Concordance, and analytical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for influenza A, subtypes H1 and H3, and influenza B. Prevalence for influenza A by RVP was 15%, for subtype H3 it was 11.2%, and for influenza B, 2.9%. None of the aspirates were positive for influenza A subtype H1. SOFIA Influenza rapid test demonstrated good specificity and low sensitivity compared with a nucleic acid test for influenza A, subtype H3, and for influenza B. SOFIA Influenza A + B test performed well in providing a rapid diagnosis, however, confirmatory molecular testing is recommended for negative test results. Re-evaluation of test performance should be periodically carried out during outbreaks with the emergence and circulation of new influenza strains.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Viral Shedding and Clinical Illness in Naturally Acquired Influenza Virus Infections

          Abstract Background . Volunteer challenge studies have provided detailed data on viral shedding from the respiratory tract before and through the course of experimental influenza virus infection. There are no comparable quantitative data to our knowledge on naturally acquired infections. Methods . In a community-based study in Hong Kong in 2008, we followed up initially healthy individuals to quantify trends in viral shedding on the basis of cultures and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) through the course of illness associated with seasonal influenza A and B virus infection. Results . Trends in symptom scores more closely matched changes in molecular viral loads measured with RT-PCR for influenza A than for influenza B. For influenza A virus infections, the replicating viral loads determined with cultures decreased to undetectable levels earlier after illness onset than did molecular viral loads. Most viral shedding occurred during the first 2–3 days after illness onset, and we estimated that 1%–8% of infectiousness occurs prior to illness onset. Only 14% of infections with detectable shedding at RT-PCR were asymptomatic, and viral shedding was low in these cases. Conclusions . Our results suggest that “silent spreaders” (ie, individuals who are infectious while asymptomatic or presymptomatic) may be less important in the spread of influenza epidemics than previously thought.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of the rapid diagnosis of influenza on physician decision-making and patient management in the pediatric emergency department: results of a randomized, prospective, controlled trial.

            To determine the impact of the rapid diagnosis of influenza on physician decision-making and patient management, including laboratory tests and radiographs ordered, patient charges associated with these tests, antibiotics/antivirals prescribed, and length of time to patient discharge from the emergency department. Patients aged 2 months to 21 years presenting to an urban children's teaching hospital emergency department were screened for fever and cough, coryza, myalgias, headache, and/or malaise. After obtaining informed consent, patients were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: 1) physician receives (physician aware of) the rapid influenza test result; or 2) physician does not receive (physician unaware of) the result. For patients in the physician aware group, nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained, immediately tested with the FluOIA test for influenza A and B, and the result was placed on the chart before patient evaluation by the attending physician. For the physician unaware group, nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained, stored according to manufacturer's directions, and tested within 24 hours. Results for the physician unaware group were not disclosed to the treating physicians at any time. The 2 resultant influenza-positive groups (aware and unaware) were compared for laboratory and radiograph studies and their associated patient charges, antibiotic/antiviral prescriptions, and length of stay in the emergency department. A total of 418 patients were enrolled, and 391 completed the study. Of these, 202 tested positive for influenza. Comparison of the 96 influenza-positive patients whose physician was aware of the result with the 106 influenza-positive patients whose physician was unaware of the result revealed significant reductions among the former group in: 1) numbers of complete blood counts, blood cultures, urinalyses, urine cultures, and chest radiographs performed; 2) charges associated with these tests; 3) antibiotics prescribed; and 4) length of stay in the emergency department. The number of influenza-positive patients who received prescriptions for antiviral drugs was significantly higher among those whose physician was aware of the result. Physician awareness of a rapid diagnosis of influenza in the pediatric emergency department significantly reduced the number of laboratory tests and radiographs ordered and their associated charges, decreased antibiotic use, increased antiviral use, and decreased length of time to discharge.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A National Study of the Impact of Rapid Influenza Testing on Clinical Care in the Emergency Department.

              Rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDT) may influence physician decision-making. Single-center studies suggest that influenza diagnosed in association with RIDT reduces ancillary testing and antibiotic prescribing. The extent of RIDT use in US emergency departments (EDs) and their impact on patient management are unknown. We examined the use of RIDT and its effect on influenza management, using a national sample of ED visits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Investig Med
                J. Investig. Med
                jim
                jim
                Journal of Investigative Medicine
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                1081-5589
                1708-8267
                April 2016
                16 February 2016
                : 64
                : 4
                : 905-907
                Affiliations
                Department of Pathology, UMass Memorial Medical Center , Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr L V Rao, Department of Hospital Labs/Pathology, Biotech-1, 365 Plantation Street, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01605, USA; Lokinendi.Rao@ 123456Umassmemorial.org
                Article
                jim-2016-000055
                10.1136/jim-2016-000055
                4819670
                26911275
                3611f105-5f78-4f17-b4dd-d1c9cfbed9ac
                Copyright © 2016 American Federation for Medical Research
                History
                : 27 January 2016
                Categories
                Brief Report
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                biological markers,clinical research,disease management,immunologic tests,respiratory tract diseases

                Comments

                Comment on this article