2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Autonomic Modulation for Cardiovascular Disease

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, including congestive heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias. Despite advances in the medical and surgical management of these entities, progression of disease persists as does the risk for sudden cardiac death. With improved knowledge of the dynamic relationships between the nervous system and heart, neuromodulatory techniques such as cardiac sympathetic denervation and vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) have emerged as possible therapeutic approaches for the management of these disorders. In this review, we present the structure and function of the cardiac nervous system and the remodeling that occurs in disease states, emphasizing the concept of increased sympathoexcitation and reduced parasympathetic tone. We review preclinical evidence for vagal nerve stimulation, and early results of clinical trials in the setting of congestive heart failure. Vagal nerve stimulation, and other neuromodulatory techniques, may improve the management of cardiovascular disorders, and warrant further study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references185

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update

          Circulation
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

            Circulation, 139(10)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart Failure

              We compared the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 with enalapril in patients who had heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. In previous studies, enalapril improved survival in such patients. In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 8442 patients with class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less to receive either LCZ696 (at a dose of 200 mg twice daily) or enalapril (at a dose of 10 mg twice daily), in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure, but the trial was designed to detect a difference in the rates of death from cardiovascular causes. The trial was stopped early, according to prespecified rules, after a median follow-up of 27 months, because the boundary for an overwhelming benefit with LCZ696 had been crossed. At the time of study closure, the primary outcome had occurred in 914 patients (21.8%) in the LCZ696 group and 1117 patients (26.5%) in the enalapril group (hazard ratio in the LCZ696 group, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.87; P<0.001). A total of 711 patients (17.0%) receiving LCZ696 and 835 patients (19.8%) receiving enalapril died (hazard ratio for death from any cause, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93; P<0.001); of these patients, 558 (13.3%) and 693 (16.5%), respectively, died from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.89; P<0.001). As compared with enalapril, LCZ696 also reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure by 21% (P<0.001) and decreased the symptoms and physical limitations of heart failure (P=0.001). The LCZ696 group had higher proportions of patients with hypotension and nonserious angioedema but lower proportions with renal impairment, hyperkalemia, and cough than the enalapril group. LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of death and of hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by Novartis; PARADIGM-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01035255.).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Physiol
                Front Physiol
                Front. Physiol.
                Frontiers in Physiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-042X
                22 December 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 617459
                Affiliations
                [1] 1University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, David Geffen School of Medicine , Los Angeles, CA, United States
                [2] 2UCLA Neurocardiology Research Program of Excellence, UCLA , Los Angeles, CA, United States
                [3] 3Molecular, Cellular, and Integrative Physiology Program, UCLA , Los Angeles, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Eugene Nalivaiko, The University of Newcastle, Australia

                Reviewed by: Peter John Schwartz, Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IRCCS), Italy; David Mendelowitz, George Washington University, United States

                *Correspondence: Jeffrey L. Ardell, jardell@ 123456mednet.ucla.edu

                This article was submitted to Integrative Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

                Article
                10.3389/fphys.2020.617459
                7783451
                33414727
                361bfd47-2fca-4bc0-af5f-5c6e13d4e31e
                Copyright © 2020 Hadaya and Ardell.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 October 2020
                : 25 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 185, Pages: 19, Words: 14905
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: 3OT2OD023848
                Award ID: UO1EB025138
                Categories
                Physiology
                Review

                Anatomy & Physiology
                vagus nerve,neuromodulation,neurocardiology,autonomic nervous system,heart failure,myocardial infaraction,arrhythmia,sympathectomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article